GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager comparison

GFI and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. GFI is ranked #16, while Ivanti is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0. GFI holds a 2.5% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

GFI LanGuard

Read 11 GFI LanGuard reviews

1,330 Views
1,317 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Read 4 Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager reviews

838 Views
838 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GFI LanGuard

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

GFI LanGuard and Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager are prominent solutions in network security and endpoint management. GFI LanGuard seems to have the upper hand in pricing and customer support.

Features: GFI LanGuard is known for its vulnerability scanning, network discovery, and patch management. Users value Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager for its comprehensive update management, automated patching, and detailed reporting. Ivanti's extensive feature set presents a more powerful solution for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: GFI LanGuard users note the need for improved reporting and more seamless integration with other tools. Key areas for improvement for Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager include enhanced user-friendliness and reducing resource consumption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GFI LanGuard is often praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager, while slightly more complex to deploy, is supported by detailed documentation and reliable customer assistance.

Pricing and ROI: GFI LanGuard is highlighted for its cost-effectiveness and favorable return on investment, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious organizations. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager, despite being more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to its comprehensive feature set and thorough protection capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard

Ranking in Patch Management

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Ranking in Patch Management

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 2.5%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is 2.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GFI LanGuard	2.5%
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager	2.4%
Other	95.1%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Thanu Kishore

Technical Executive at Satcom Infotech

Effective patch management boosts network security and enhances compliance reporting

The product is currently on-premise, and I think the cloud option is still yet to come. If a customer has their own cloud, we can host it there, but the SaaS model is not available, and most companies are requesting the SaaS model for patch management. GFI LanGuard is a good competitor in the market and is popular in my region. We get many leads and numerous requirements for patch management, but most companies ask for the SaaS model, which creates challenges. Third-party app integration needs to be increased in GFI LanGuard. It shouldn't be limited to 30 or 40 applications because there are many applications being used. Instead of manually patching everything, if those patches are included in the product, it would be easier for automatic patching.

Read full review

Muhammad Baber

System Administrator at Alghanim Industries

Enables organizations to install patches easily, but the UI must be more user-friendly

We can push many things from a centralized endpoint system. If we want to install software on multiple servers, we can do it from the centralized system. We can also run commands and push packages from a centralized location. We can automate things. Images are deployed on our laptops through Ivanti. Whenever a new laptop comes, we connect to the network, and the system gets installed with predefined applications. It happens automatically.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to use and integrates well with other operating systems."

"It is helpful to patch and scan vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature."

"I like that the solution can block users from unnecessarily putting devices on the network."

"The most useful features of GFI LanGuard are vulnerability assessment and patching solutions."

"This product is a great solution at a great price as long as it is only going to be used for a local area network."

"The most valuable feature is that I am able to patch third-party solutions."

"The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others."

More GFI LanGuard pros

"The product is easy to use, easy to implement, and easy to manage."

"It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."

"When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."

"Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."

Cons

"GFI LanGuard could improve the rollback feature. If we have installed the wrong we have had some issues with the rollback function. Additionally, more input from GFI LanGuard for the custom software push install."

"The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding more modules, such as asset control or asset inventory."

"This solution is limited to the local area network only and cannot manage remote devices."

"The version we are using only allows one person to use it at a time and does not allow multi-users."

"If GFI LanGuard had a cloud version it would be better for people that are working from home."

"GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines."

"The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes."

More GFI LanGuard cons

"The UI must be more user-friendly."

"Inability to configure a rule-based management."

"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."

"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."

"GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."

"I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."

"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."

"GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."

"In terms of pricing, it is on the expensive side."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Photography Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GFI LanGuard?

I have not encountered the pricing aspect since I am from the technical side; only the sales team handles the pricing part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?

My experience with GFI LanGuard involves patch management where, whenever we visit customers, they request patches for both third-party applications and OS systems. When it is on-premise, we can pr...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

The UI must be more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

We use the solution to patch Windows and Linux machines. We download the patches and implement them. We get vulnerability reports after patching.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

We have one technical person. My team handles the patches for Windows and Linux. The product is good for endpoints. I do not recommend the tool for servers. Microsoft's predefined patching solution...

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 13% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 11% of the time

BigFix vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 6% of the time

More GFI LanGuard Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Patch My PC vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 10% of the time

NinjaOne vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 9% of the time

More Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard

February 2026

Download GFI LanGuard product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

February 2026

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager report

Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager product report

Also Known As

LanGuard

Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, Patch for Endpoints, Shavlik Patch for Endpoints

Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

GFI

Patch for Endpoint Manager can swiftly detect vulnerabilities in Windows, Mac OS, Linux, and hundreds of third-party apps (Acrobat Flash/Reader, Java, Web browsers, and more) and deploy expertly pre-tested patches everywhere you need them.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross

InfoPro Digital, Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

February 2026

Free Report: GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.