Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs SS&amp;C Blue Prism comparison

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. SS&C Blue Prism

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in Business Process Design

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SS&C Blue Prism

Ranking in Business Process Design

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (34th), Process Automation (26th), Medical Insurance Claims Software (3rd), Insurance Claims Processing (5th), Document Management Software (15th), Low-Code Development Platforms (25th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (16th), Loan Management Software (2nd), Document Automation Software (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SS&C Blue Prism is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Gavin Beckett

Intelligent Automation Solution Architect at Digiblu

Design studio enables effective automation while licensing needs improvement

I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors. Having this capability could accelerate the process. The delivery methodology felt somewhat waterfall in style and not sufficiently agile. Additionally, the licensing model was somewhat prohibitive. It was not developed in a consumption-based manner, however, rather in a fixed-price licensing model that did not account for volumes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

"Some important features include the language capabilities, which are crucial since RPA has to read the documents provided by the customer."

"The key feature of SS&C that I find valuable is the general workflow visibility."

"I find the design studio, where I can build the automation, and the control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, to be the most useful."

Cons

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

"I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors."

"Blue Prism is more costly than UiPath in terms of robotic licenses and orchestrators."

"There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

17%

Insurance Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...

What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...

What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SS&C Blue Prism?

The pricing was not particularly competitive. It wasn't flexible for different geographies. For instance, in Africa, they didn't have a different pricing model to account for affordability. The pri...

What needs improvement with SS&C Blue Prism?

There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C. Currently, integration is limited to web services and K scripts for connecting to third-party systems, which I believe ca...

What is your primary use case for SS&C Blue Prism?

My primary use case for SS&C is managing migration projects. We are currently working on migrating from ViewStation's 3.5 version using K scripts to the new version in SS&C and rebuilding t...

Camunda vs SS&C Blue Prism

Comparisons

No data available

Compared 40% of the time

Appian vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 22% of the time

IBM BPM vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 19% of the time

FIS Commercial Lending Suite vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 19% of the time

More SS&C Blue Prism Competitors

Product Reports

Business Process Design

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Business Process Design

Download SS&C Blue Prism product report

Also Known As

Enterprise Process Center

SS&C AWD

Overview

The Enterprise Process Center, A BPM software, helps companies gain a 360 degree blueprint of the organization in support of complex improvement, compliance and transformation initiatives. The EPC goes beyond process mapping & analysis, it covers the full spectrum of lifecycle governance and collaboration, enterprise architecture (EA), strategy-to-execution and workflow automation needs. The EPC offers a single repository to manage all complex business entity relationships and interdependencies, including: processes, procedures, roles, org units, resources, risks, controls, policies, rules, documents, strategic objectives, key performance indicators, systems, meta data & services. The EPC facilitates the alignment and visualization of strategic and operational performance and is often leveraged for quality, improvement, risk & audit management initiatives such as ISO, Lean, Basel III, SOX, and ITIL, amongst others.

Interfacing Technologies

SS&C Blue Prism provides scalable, intelligent automation for dynamic business environments. Its technology enhances process efficiency and delivers significant operational benefits. Users leverage its capabilities in task automation and broader digital transformation strategies.

SS&C Blue Prism incorporates advanced robotic process automation aimed at optimizing workflows and enabling end-to-end automation. It allows businesses to automate repetitive tasks, integrate systems, and improve process accuracy. With a focus on enterprise-grade security and compliance, it helps organizations achieve digital transformation milestones while maintaining robust control frameworks.

What are the critical features of SS&C Blue Prism?

Robust Automation: Enables complex process automation with scalability.
Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with many systems and applications.
Security and Compliance: Ensures data protection and regulatory adherence.

What benefits or ROI should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Significant time savings and resource optimization.
Cost Reduction: Decreased operational costs through task automation.
Accuracy: Enhanced precision in process execution and data handling.

SS&C Blue Prism finds implementation across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, where automation is harnessed to optimize high-volume transactional tasks. In finance, it automates reconciliation processes, while in healthcare, it aids in patient data management, showcasing its versatility.

SS&C Technologies

Sample Customers

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., EFFORTS, Stuart Wright

AWS, EY, Deloitte, ABBYY, Microsoft, GLYNT.AI, Pfizer, Invesco, Western Union

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. SS&C Blue Prism