Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Infor LN vs Microsoft Dynamics AX comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
Infor LN offers higher returns than SAP through automation, improving efficiency, productivity, and operational cost savings for businesses.
Sentiment score
7.3
Microsoft Dynamics AX enhances efficiency, reduces costs, and offers rapid ROI, benefiting organizations of all sizes with centralized management.
Infor has saved us time by bringing a large division into one language and has saved us money.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.0
Infor LN offers reliable global customer service, but customization challenges and quality improvements are needed in ticket resolutions.
Sentiment score
4.2
Dynamics AX support is praised for responsiveness and resources, though customization challenges and partner reliance pose issues.
They respond quickly and are helpful overall.
My overall experience contacting Infor technical support is good.
Microsoft has really good documentation, and they are known for that.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Infor LN offers scalable, seamless operations with regular updates, supporting diverse enterprise needs for both cloud and on-premise environments.
Sentiment score
7.1
Microsoft Dynamics AX excels in scalability and adaptability for varied industries, though larger deployments may face hardware and compatibility challenges.
Infor is a 100% scalable solution that supports our needs.
The system is scalable.
It struggles with scalability when you need to manage financial reporting or setup for multiple companies.
There are these things called AOS nodes where if you have more users and performance decreases, you can add more servers to the cluster.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Infor LN is stable and reliable, requiring some training; support effectively resolves performance issues and minor challenges.
Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Dynamics AX's stability varies, influenced by hardware, customization, maintenance, VPN issues, and user-specific setups.
I have not had any major issues with stability.
If you do the maintenance and have your own people, it could be stable, but it means a lot of work.
 

Room For Improvement

Infor LN needs UI enhancements, improved reporting, efficient integration, better HR, expanded AI, and faster service support.
Microsoft Dynamics AX faces performance issues and lacks support; users are encouraged to transition to Dynamics 365 for improvements.
Improvements in AI features for the UI could enhance the overall experience.
We have problems with the database, not with Infor - with the Oracle database.
The user interface of Infor LN could be more intuitive for common users.
Another drawback is the absence of features like purchase order accruals, critical accounting concepts, and a robust fixed assets module.
It is no longer supported from a security perspective, so it is not getting updated.
 

Setup Cost

Infor LN offers competitive pricing with typical user fees of $1,500, though additional costs and flexible cloud options exist.
Microsoft Dynamics AX is pricey, with costs adding up from licenses and implementation, making thorough enterprise assessment essential.
Infor LN is cost-effective when compared to solutions like SAP.
The price is seven on a scale of one to ten, with SAP being more expensive than Infor LN.
Acquiring a developer license for customization is expensive, costing over one hundred thousand Hong Kong dollars.
 

Valuable Features

Infor LN is a versatile ERP solution appreciated for customization, automation, industry compatibility, and cost-effectiveness.
Microsoft Dynamics AX offers flexible, user-friendly integration with strong modules, customization, and cloud-based accessibility for diverse business operations.
It simplifies tracking by following every transaction in the system, allowing finance to see online each finance transaction from production orders, purchase orders, inventory, and project-wise.
Infor LN is compatible with our company size and is cost-effective compared to other ERP solutions like SAP.
The most valuable feature of Infor LN is the support and educational tools it provides.
I have not had any major issue with stability.
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is its full integration with Excel, allowing for cut and paste functionality between Excel and the system.
 

Categories and Ranking

Infor LN
Ranking in ERP
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Dynamics AX
Ranking in ERP
6th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
Activity Based Costing Software (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor LN is 5.7%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics AX is 6.0%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
ERP
 

Featured Reviews

Jarod Dwi - PeerSpot reviewer
ERP integration transforms automation and financial reporting with good support
I use the solution for the manufacturing process, finance, supply chains, and quality It integrates with robotic processing and automation, enhancing our process automation. It also integrates with the PLC system using Mitsubishi and with the MIS software. The solution covers all modules,…
SherifAnter - PeerSpot reviewer
The sales and distribution modules are robust, and reliable, and seldom encounter issues
In GP, there are certain features like financial reporting that aren't part of the core GP package. Users might need to install additional components for these features. For example, there's a reseller product called Management Reporter, but many users would prefer to have the reporting capabilities integrated within GP itself, rather than relying on external tools. The manufacturing module in GP is quite basic, and those who require more advanced manufacturing capabilities often turn to third-party modules or tools. Additionally, you might be aware that in 2028, GP is expected to reach its end of life. Microsoft has already ceased selling GP to new customers. It's essentially the same product, but this marks the final year for GP's availability.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
863,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
Retailer
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Infor LN?
Most of them who use Infor LN have add-ons connected to ERP. It's either a supplier exchange, or they've got sales problems that are integrated with it.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor LN?
Infor LN is cost-effective when compared to solutions like SAP.
What needs improvement with Infor LN?
The user interface of Infor LN could be more intuitive for common users. Sometimes, it is necessary to have an expert for connections.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics AX?
Microsoft Dynamics AX has several areas that need improvement, particularly when compared to larger systems. It lacks the concept of month-end closing, which is essential for tight control over fin...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics AX?
I primarily use Microsoft Dynamics AX ( /products/microsoft-dynamics-ax-reviews ) for the financial module, which includes the general ledger, account payable, account receivable, inventory, and pu...
 

Also Known As

Infor ERP LN
Dynamics AX, Axapta, MS Dynamics AX
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LTH Castings, Gloucester Engineering, Gorman-Rupp, Computer Designs, Instrument Technology, GWA Group Limited, PRIDE Industries, CAV Aerospace, New Scale Technologies Inc.
ConQuaestor, D & H Distributing, Sunny Queen, Mesa Associates, Britax Childcare, Ibema, Arafa, Sabo S.p.A.
Find out what your peers are saying about Infor LN vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
863,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.