We performed a comparison between IdentityMind and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."They have a very wide variety of rules that allow you to integrate well."
"The automated checks are excellent."
"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms."
"The most valuable feature is automation which makes our transaction capture 40 percent easier."
"The most valuable feature is the designer, which allows us to connect to UI and build things directly, such as creating a platform with our synchronizing policy manager rules, without any additional requirements."
"I like the score generated on the Actimize platform for each customer transaction. Those are transactions per second, accommodating millions of transactions per second. That's the best feature of Actimize."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."
"It's a very good product for compliance and transaction monitoring for anti-money laundering."
"The case management tool is user friendly."
"The UI at first felt like it wasn't the easiest interface to interact with."
"Some of the language around rules and integration can certainly be improved."
"Sometimes when we move from one version to another, a few things don't work as expected."
"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex."
"Processes don't function when front end is down."
"Its user interface could be better."
"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."
"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."
"The patch section has room for improvement."
"One of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side."
More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IdentityMind is ranked 51st in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 17 reviews. IdentityMind is rated 8.6, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IdentityMind writes "Great third-party integrations, very stable and easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Highly intelligent and effective for detecting fraud in transactions". IdentityMind is most compared with , whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix and Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
