Arcserve UDP vs IBM Tivoli CDP for Files comparison

"Easy restoration and the solution works quickly."

"The backup is the most valuable feature. It also makes storage very easy."

"The ability to switch between different hardware platforms and utilization tools are some of this solution's most valuable features."

"The most valuable features are that it is able to restore quickly and that it is able to virtually restore on Hyper-V."

"This product is extremely user-friendly and it is capable of performing large-scale archive/backup (five+ years worth). It is easy to store, maintain, and check backups."

"The most valuable feature of Arcserve UDP is its decompression capability."

"The product provides instant and virtual standbys."

"The most valuable feature of Arcserve UDP is the initiative UI and the logs are clear and detailed that are generated when there has been an issue or failure on the user's system. We only have to log onto the client's system to retrieve the information. It is possible to precisely identify the problem's location. The system categorizes and logs every step in a structured manner, selectively displaying only the essential logs. However, to view a comprehensive log, one must access the line machine log and examine the actual client for detailed logging."

"The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable."

"Licensing is an area that needs improvement."

"The technical support of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The speed of restores should be improved. We have found the speed of large restores rather slow."

"We cannot restore each user's mailbox. Each user's mailbox should be independently restorable. Also, this solution is very slow. If you select all of the servers, it runs for a long time... It needs to be faster. Finally, If anything happens to one server we should be able to switch to another server."

"The time to backup servers that sit in DMZ must be improved."

"They could work on their marketing approach. I don't see many people leveraging it."

"We have to use a Microsoft hypervisor for installation which is expensive."

"It should be easier to switch between backup locations. We have multiple data storage locations and sometimes one of those storages need to be replaced. It would be nice if they made it easier to reconfigure the backup configuration."

"We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each disk rather than allowing us to select what data we want backed."

"There is an annual license required for this solution and it is priced well."

"Its price seems reasonable. Its price is average as compared to the other products I've looked at. We have a three-year license right now. There are no other costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The price of StorageCraft ShadowProtect is competitive in the market."

"It is approximately $400 to purchase a virtual service outright."

"The price of this product is high and it should be lower."

"As an MSP partner, I believe that the prices are fair."

"I feel that the product is fairly priced."

"The pricing of the product can be considered to be reasonable enough for the Asian region."

"It's expensive, but it's worth for it due to the volume of critical information within our database. We are currently paying about $22,000 per year."