Arcserve UDP vs IBM Tivoli CDP for Files comparison

Arcserve and IBM are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Arcserve is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.3, while IBM is ranked #78. Arcserve holds a 1.2% mindshare in BRS, compared to IBM’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Arcserve users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Arcserve UDP

Read 44 Arcserve UDP reviews

3,318 Views
2,787 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files

Read 1 IBM Tivoli CDP for Files review

784 Views
776 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arcserve UDP

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Arcserve UDP and IBM Tivoli CDP for Files based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,328 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve UDP

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (22nd)

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

78th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Arcserve UDP is 1.2%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Arcserve UDP	1.2%
IBM Tivoli CDP for Files	0.5%
Other	98.3%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Sergio Itikawa

Software Solutions Architect at SPEData

Has supported hybrid IT environments effectively and offers strong data protection

With Arcserve UDP, the most valuable feature is to improve persistent data, which I consider important. I use other products too, not only Arcserve UDP, as we use TrueNAS as well. Arcserve UDP improves the precision of data. I have utilized Arcserve UDP's data deduplication feature, and the data deduplication feature helps my storage efficiency significantly. I have used Arcserve UDP's continuous data protection. It is beneficial for operational continuity because we use it constantly and have no objections to Arcserve UDP technology; I think it is very good. Arcserve UDP's integration with multiple operating systems is very good and very efficient. This brings value for me since many of my clients have different operating systems like Windows and Linux; there is no problem. Regarding the deduplication and compression with Arcserve UDP, I think Arcserve UDP is still a solid solution that we primarily use.

Read full review

reviewer1035033

Sr. Aix Admin at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Restoration and infrastructure are extremely reliable

We are currently using Tivoli to backup 15 terabytes within our Oracle Database using a RMAN backup script. The RMAN's utility and restoration has been perfect, we have yet to experience any issues. It's very reliable The restoration and infrastructure are extremely reliable. We would like to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are that it is able to restore quickly and that it is able to virtually restore on Hyper-V."

"Arcserve has a feature called virtual standby (VSB), which has been very helpful because I already have a hot standby copy of my critical infrastructure. If something breaks, I can spin up that virtual standby copy in less than five minutes and ensure that my data is available to everyone and that business continuity is maintained."

"It allows us to back up all the servers and centrally manage them."

"The most valuable feature is the duplication."

"The ability to switch between different hardware platforms and utilization tools are some of this solution's most valuable features."

"One of the things that I do like about it is that it has a very good deduplication feature."

"Arcserve UDP has a good configuration and user interface. It makes the job of an administrator easy."

"Global deduplication is the best feature of this solution."

More Arcserve UDP pros

"The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable."

Cons

"Licensing can be quite difficult."

"The solution can improve by allowing older versions to support the latest version of the OS."

"The tool doesn't provide cloud integration in India."

"Backups are very slow and time consuming."

"A lot of their new technologies are not very good."

"Every time I change the disc, I have to do a full backup."

"One area for improvement in Arcserve UDP is its capability to interact with other cloud servers."

"In the most recent version of premium plus the replication has been removed, and it should re-added to the solution."

More Arcserve UDP cons

"We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each disk rather than allowing us to select what data we want backed."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In comparison to other vendors, it is a low-cost solution."

"I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization."

"The price of StorageCraft ShadowProtect is competitive in the market."

"As an MSP partner, I believe that the prices are fair."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"Pricing is most likely comparable."

"Its price seems reasonable. Its price is average as compared to the other products I've looked at. We have a three-year license right now. There are no other costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The solution is priced well compared to other solutions."

More Arcserve UDP pricing and cost advice

"It's expensive, but it's worth for it due to the volume of critical information within our database. We are currently paying about $22,000 per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,328 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?

Comparing the features of the four is not the right approach. You need to develop a list of requirements for backup and DR that are specific to your organization and then compare each of the four ...

See all answers

What do you like most about StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

The interface is very refined, works fine, and is very intuitive most of the time. Scalability is nice. The multi-tenancy feature is very welcome. The integration with Linux works fine too.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

Regarding the setup cost for Arcserve UDP, it is significantly important, but the price is similar to all our options where clients need to have backup on-premises and replication in the cloud.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 8% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 4% of the time

Rubrik vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 3% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 3% of the time

More Arcserve UDP Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs IBM Tivoli CDP for Files

Compared 24% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs IBM Tivoli CDP for Files

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Storage Protect vs IBM Tivoli CDP for Files

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText Data Protector vs IBM Tivoli CDP for Files

Compared 15% of the time

More IBM Tivoli CDP for Files Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP

March 2026

Download Arcserve UDP product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

February 2026

Download IBM Tivoli CDP for Files product report

Also Known As

StorageCraft ShadowProtect, StorageCraft Backup Analyzer

Tivoli CDP for Files

Overview

Arcserve UDP is a comprehensive solution that empowers even a one-person IT department to protect virtual and physical environments with a high degree of simplicity. It allows you to design and manage your entire data protection strategy with a unified management console, and enables you to scale your data backup coverage as your organization grows with the push of a button.

Arcserve

IBM Tivoli Continuous Data Protection for Files is a continuous backup software that protects your most important files. This real-time, continuous data protection solution for file servers and user endpoints automatically backs up your most critical files the moment they are saved.

IBM

Sample Customers

ITPS, North Hertfordshire Homes, SEMIKRON, Kajaani University of Applied Sciences, Test Valley Borough Council, EK Services

Cyberian Data Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,328 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.