We performed a comparison between IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security."Our ability to see when users are accessing sensitive data."
"I think IMB's technical support is good."
"The most valuable feature is the GUI, the interface. It also interfaces well with REST API, if you want to automate some of the commands."
"The platform provides data protection from internal and external threats."
"It protects sensitive data and blocks unauthorized access to the data."
"I rate Guardium 10 out of 10 for data activity monitoring and nine for vulnerability assessment. It's easy to implement and does its job. But I would rate it seven out of 10 in terms of advanced features."
"Compliance Quick Start – Quick, GUI, step-by-step guide to automate compliance and give the customer a quick ROI."
"Database logging and audit functions are the most valuable features."
"The support is very good. They are very quick to respond when we have issues."
"The feature I have found most valuable is activity monitoring."
"The technical support is good; they are knowledgeable."
More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] Pros →
"Using the data in native Guardium is difficult, at best."
"We've had some issues recently that we're working through, on the agent software that runs on the databases."
"I would like to see a lot of additional reporting and analytics features. They have basic outlier detection, but I would love to see that go further, and model it after analytics tools like Splunk."
"I'd like to them make sure that the data sources can be more easily managed, because some of them are tied to multiple things. You try to remove one and you have to go to all the different spots to remove the associations before you can get rid of it."
"I am struggling getting through to social."
"It needs an integration with Optum."
"I would like to see AI and machine learning added in the future."
"Performance and the ability to use resources could be improved."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"The UI needs to be improved."
"In the next feature, I'd like to see more integrations and updates overall, specifically bottom tech."
More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] Cons →
More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is ranked 1st in Database Security with 70 reviews while McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Database Security with 3 reviews. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is rated 8.2, while McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security Guardium Data Protection writes "Provides visibility, has a single console that shows all information, and collector-aggregator capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] writes "The solution's activity monitoring is valuable, but it should have more integrations and updates overall". IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, Oracle Audit Vault, Oracle Advanced Security, DataSunrise Database Security and Vormetric Application Crypto Suite, whereas McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security.
See our list of best Database Security vendors.
We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
