Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL] vs MangoApps comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MangoApps
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Intranet (9th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL]?
Leave a review
JuniorSpfdac - PeerSpot reviewer
Junior Specialist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Group events allow everyone to see live updates
The ability to have a box storage feature supporting each community page is the most valuable feature, i.e., similar to what we already know. The allowance to get others to contribute to documents and make comments as all are being tracked is another important feature Group events are being…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

Lotus Quickr
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aibel AS, KDZ Wiesbaden, Ahlers AG, Integra Legal, Rheinmetall AG
Redpath and Company, See's Candies, United Way of Greater St. Louis, Lubrizol Corp., UC Hastings College of the Law, EBSGateway, Coughlin Porter Lundeen, Giffels Webster, VaperMate, Western Entertainment Management, Enaya Insurance, North York Community House, TC Media, European Electronique, Modern Technology Solutions Inc., American Chemical Society Publications, Marcaria.com, ReachGlobal, agile360, Palmer Holland, Wunderman, EPMG, Shorelight Education
Find out what your peers are saying about Slack, Microsoft, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: January 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.