We performed a comparison between IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security."It protects sensitive data and blocks unauthorized access to the data."
"The tool helps detect invalid login attempts within a specific time frame."
"It provides a comprehensive security for databases, both on-prem and on the cloud. Among the advanced features we use automatic backups, DR."
"The tech support is very knowledgeable."
"Being an IBM product it really offers security integration capabilities and robust features. Over the years, it has satisfactory met the requirements of our customers which makes it a very reliable and versatile solution."
"Database logging and audit functions are the most valuable features."
"The possible number of databases and database servers which can be monitored by Guardium is high. For me, this is a differentiator of IBM."
"The reporting side is also very, very good, especially its flexibility which allows you to tailor the reports to whatever information you want."
"The technical support is good; they are knowledgeable."
"The support is very good. They are very quick to respond when we have issues."
"The feature I have found most valuable is activity monitoring."
More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] Pros →
"We've had some issues recently that we're working through, on the agent software that runs on the databases."
"I would like to see AI and machine learning added in the future."
"The solution lacks control over database security."
"The integration part of the present solution is very complex and tedious. Plus it gives a lot of false positives which need to be eradicated over time."
"Could be more user friendly; deployment is a little complex."
"It will not go as fast as you want. "
"An area for improvement would be the user interface - currently, it takes around two to three months to become comfortable using it."
"The deployment is complex and requires expertise to deploy."
"In the next feature, I'd like to see more integrations and updates overall, specifically bottom tech."
"The UI needs to be improved."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] Cons →
More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is ranked 1st in Database Security with 70 reviews while McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Database Security with 3 reviews. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is rated 8.2, while McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security Guardium Data Protection writes "Provides visibility, has a single console that shows all information, and collector-aggregator capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] writes "The solution's activity monitoring is valuable, but it should have more integrations and updates overall". IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, Oracle Audit Vault, Oracle Advanced Security, DataSunrise Database Security and Vormetric Application Crypto Suite, whereas McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases [EOL] is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security.
See our list of best Database Security vendors.
We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
