

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Transparency has increased within and across our teams.
I have seen a return on investment with Targetprocess, including improvement in cycle time from 97 to 45 days by understanding the bottlenecks and flow improvements through visualization and tracking functionality.
I have seen a return on investment through faster PI planning and backlog grooming, unified views across teams and portfolios, improved capacity planning, and forecasting.
The technical support from IBM rates an eight out of ten.
The customer support for Targetprocess is very responsive and proactive.
Targetprocess customer support is great and responsive.
The customer support for Targetprocess is one of the best
It is very highly scalable because it can handle all my organization's growth easily.
Targetprocess is scalable because it handles even huge data sets easily while maintaining its performance, being fast and reliable.
It is very scalable, handling my organization's needs in a perfect manner.
Targetprocess is very stable, although when dealing with huge data sets, the dashboard seems to lag.
Targetprocess is very stable.
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management can be improved by enhancing its pricing structure.
I would like to see improvements in Targetprocess, particularly in AI, as it is needed to allow users to better understand and interpret data.
Dashboards with large data sets can cause performance lags or time-outs, and introducing more flexible, template-based RBAC configuration would be beneficial.
It should allow users to navigate easily.
The licensing cost is low and very straightforward.
The licensing cost is very affordable.
the cost is not very effective, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget
The capability of IBM Engineering Workflow Management in managing end-to-end workflows is quite robust, especially with the built-in change management capabilities.
It provides more efficiencies for our scrum team, ensures everyone is on the same page, and offers leadership insight into progress.
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization by integrating seamlessly with AWS billing data for improved cost transparency.
Targetprocess has positively impacted our organization by reducing waste through maximizing integrations, allowing us to move away from manual rate management and tracking, enabling greater visibility to portfolio change management, and enabling us to become more data-driven.
The best features Targetprocess offers include web-based administrators of this application that allow me to do field level mapping in a significant way.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Targetprocess | 1.5% |
| IBM Engineering Workflow Management | 2.8% |
| Other | 95.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers change and task management with seamless integration into development processes. It supports compliance and progress tracking and provides collaborative tools, configuration management integration, and isolated sandboxes.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management aids Agile software development by facilitating project and sprint planning, load distribution, task tracking, and more. It offers comprehensive reporting, traceability, and sophisticated resource management. Users face challenges with loading speed, permissions, complex integrations, and have critiqued customization and pricing. There's a tendency for the system to have a steep learning curve, making plan management cumbersome and upgrades labor-intensive.
What are its key features?In industries like finance and healthcare, IBM Engineering Workflow Management supports Agile methodologies by managing agile projects, development stories, defect tracking, and use cases. It helps integrate custom processes, GRC structures, and supports API and RTP activities, ensuring traceability and compliance in complex environments.
Targetprocess provides seamless Jira integration for enhanced collaboration and planning. It aids in managing workforces and portfolios efficiently, offering clear visualization across teams, and supports AI-enhanced integration with third-party tools to streamline planning processes.
Targetprocess is designed to improve cost and time management with customizable dashboards and intuitive UI. It offers effective report generation and fosters agility, reducing tool redundancy. Users find value in its comprehensive capabilities to consolidate data, perform impact assessments, and manage software backlogs efficiently. It promotes clear visualization and transparency across departments while centralizing intake and workflow management. However, some aspects like user-friendliness in its interface and better single sign-on functionality require improvements. Challenges include the need for enhanced AI capabilities, improved notification options, and more intuitive search features.
What important features define Targetprocess?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
Targetprocess is implemented across sectors to manage portfolio demand and streamline workflows. It is especially useful for IT management, enabling devices and infrastructure monitoring, aligning projects with strategic objectives, and facilitating Agile, ITSM, and traditional frameworks adaptation. It significantly boosts productivity and collaboration by organizing backlogs and managing resources effectively, offering robust features for centralized intake and workflow management.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.