IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Targetprocess comparison

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Targetprocess

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.1

IBM Engineering Workflow Management boosted productivity by 30%, improving task tracking and offering valuable insights for scrum teams.

Sentiment score

8.9

Targetprocess enhances ROI by boosting transparency, collaboration, and efficiency, aligning work with strategy, and reducing costs.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Engineering Workflow Management report

The ability for teams to see what other teams are working on is excellent, allowing for faster collaboration.

Senior Software Engineer at GE

I have seen a return on investment through faster PI planning and backlog grooming, unified views across teams and portfolios, improved capacity planning, and forecasting.

Technical Lead at Cardinal Health

I have seen a return on investment with Targetprocess, including improvement in cycle time from 97 to 45 days by understanding the bottlenecks and flow improvements through visualization and tracking functionality.

For more quotes and insights, download the Targetprocess report

Fleet Manager at UPS

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.3

IBM Engineering Workflow Management's support is generally good, but feedback varies and requires dedicated management for best results.

Sentiment score

9.0

Targetprocess customer support is praised for being responsive and proactive, with satisfaction ratings between seven and nine out of ten.

The technical support from IBM rates an eight out of ten.

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Engineering Workflow Management report

Technical Lead at Microgenesis Techsoft Private limited

They have been very responsive and proactive.

For more quotes and insights, download the Targetprocess report

Senior Software Engineer at GE

The customer support for Targetprocess is very responsive and proactive.

Lesley Noah

Software Engineer at Unilever

The customer support provided by Targetprocess is very responsive and proactive.

Johan Sven

Senior Data Specialist at Wells Fargo

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.6

IBM Engineering Workflow Management is scalable, handling small to large projects; updates promise better reporting, though containerization is missing.

Sentiment score

9.5

Targetprocess is praised for efficiently managing workload and adapting to organizational growth without sacrificing speed or reliability.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Engineering Workflow Management report

Targetprocess is scalable because it handles even huge data sets easily while maintaining its performance, being fast and reliable.

Technical Lead at Cardinal Health

It is very highly scalable because it can handle all my organization's growth easily.

For more quotes and insights, download the Targetprocess report

Fleet Manager at UPS

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.4

IBM Engineering Workflow Management is generally stable, but performance issues and customization challenges affect user experience and stability ratings.

Sentiment score

9.1

Targetprocess is praised for stability and minimal downtime, though slight lag occurs with large data sets.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Engineering Workflow Management report

Targetprocess is very stable, although when dealing with huge data sets, the dashboard seems to lag.

For more quotes and insights, download the Targetprocess report

Technical Lead at Cardinal Health

Room For Improvement

IBM Engineering Workflow Management needs UI modernization, better tool integration, improved permissions, and streamlined upgrades to enhance adoption.

Targetprocess requires AI, integration, cost efficiency, self-service, support, RBAC, and performance improvements for enhanced functionality.

Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.

Jarvis Bellamy

Sr. Project Scheduler at a government with 10,001+ employees

IBM Engineering Workflow Management can be improved by enhancing its pricing structure.

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Engineering Workflow Management report

Technical Lead at Microgenesis Techsoft Private limited

I would like to see improvements in Targetprocess, particularly in AI, as it is needed to allow users to better understand and interpret data.

Fleet Manager at UPS

The cost is somewhat high, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget.

Jiratip Patel

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Dashboards with large data sets can cause performance lags or time-outs, and introducing more flexible, template-based RBAC configuration would be beneficial.

For more quotes and insights, download the Targetprocess report

Technical Lead at Cardinal Health

Setup Cost

IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers complex, costly licensing, yet its effectiveness and ROI justify the investment for many organizations.

Targetprocess is cost-effective for large teams, affordable compared to competitors, but pricier for smaller organizations despite smooth setup.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Engineering Workflow Management report

the cost is not very effective, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget

Jiratip Patel

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Targetprocess were cost-effective and relatively affordable.

Technical Lead at Cardinal Health

The licensing cost is very affordable.

For more quotes and insights, download the Targetprocess report

Fleet Manager at UPS

Valuable Features

IBM Engineering Workflow Management enhances task management with robust traceability, customizable dashboards, and seamless integration for agile adoption.

Targetprocess enhances project management with customization, integration, and visibility, supporting business alignment and efficient team communication and planning.

The capability of IBM Engineering Workflow Management in managing end-to-end workflows is quite robust, especially with the built-in change management capabilities.

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Engineering Workflow Management report

Technical Lead at Microgenesis Techsoft Private limited

It provides more efficiencies for our scrum team, ensures everyone is on the same page, and offers leadership insight into progress.

Jarvis Bellamy

Sr. Project Scheduler at a government with 10,001+ employees

Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization by integrating seamlessly with AWS billing data for improved cost transparency.

Jiratip Patel

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Targetprocess has positively impacted our organization by reducing waste through maximizing integrations, allowing us to move away from manual rate management and tracking, enabling greater visibility to portfolio change management, and enabling us to become more data-driven.

Technical Lead at Cardinal Health

The reporting feature in Targetprocess provides a wide range of standard reports and has excellent ability to perform self-service reports for any needed scenario with slice and dice and filtering at all levels.

For more quotes and insights, download the Targetprocess report

Senior Software Engineer at GE

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

9th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (4th)

Targetprocess

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Value Stream Management Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Workflow Management is 2.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Targetprocess is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Targetprocess	1.1%
IBM Engineering Workflow Management	2.1%
Other	96.8%

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

Featured Reviews

Manages complex workflows effectively and offers valuable features

Technical Lead at Microgenesis Techsoft Private limited

My name is Sofia from PeerSpot regarding my experience with IBM Engineering Workflow Management. It is a leading review site. The solution is very easy to trace. My company name is MicroGenesis TechSoft Private Limited, and my title is Technical Lead. I am interested in being a reference for this vendor. PeerSpot will create an account and email login credentials. The review will be published in written and/or audio format on peerspot.com and made available to other users. PeerSpot will email a link to the written review for editing at any time. The review may be available to third parties on third-party websites. For anonymous reviews, names will not appear. Email notifications relevant to the review are optional and can be opted out at any time. The use of reviews is subject to PeerSpot's terms of use at peerspot.com/tos. On a scale of 1-10, I rate IBM Engineering Workflow Management a 10.

Read full review

Linking OKRs to financials has improved portfolio visibility and now drives faster agile delivery

Senior Software Engineer at GE

Targetprocess offers several valuable features, including easy customization when required and ease of use for getting started, making it suitable for beginners. The reporting feature in Targetprocess provides a wide range of standard reports and has excellent ability to perform self-service reports for any needed scenario with slice and dice and filtering at all levels. Targetprocess is very easy to use. For beginners, screens and views are well-represented and easy to understand. Project portfolio management is easy, including budgeting, capacity planning, forecasting, and dashboards that are excellent. Targetprocess has positively impacted the organization, as visibility was a crucial deliverable. Agility health measures have increased by 30%. Feature cycle time, which is clearly measured across the ART, has improved by 50% over the past three years. The clearer and more effective measurable PI planning events are excellent, with the PI objectives achieved rate now at 80 to 90% versus 55% when starting. Measuring agility health and feature cycle time has been a fantastic part of the journey and growth, helping achieve high levels of maturity after years. Targetprocess was implemented early in the Agile journey and within six months, growth occurred with the tool, fundamentally assisting in configuring portfolios, understanding Agile ways and methodology, and allowing the creation of measures and reports much faster, fully integrated with Jira in a bi-directional way.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

17%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?

I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.

What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?

IBM Engineering Workflow Management can be improved by enhancing its pricing structure, specifically the cost and licensing of this solution.

What is your primary use case for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?

The typical use case for IBM Engineering Workflow Management is to streamline project management and ensure efficient workflow.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Targetprocess?

Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, Targetprocess is a bit expensive if it can be used by all team members, but for now, the price is manageable and cost-effective.

What needs improvement with Targetprocess?

One area for improvement in Targetprocess is that costing can become substantial when wanting to use it across all teams. A needed improvement in Targetprocess would be to build deeper AI functiona...

What is your primary use case for Targetprocess?

Targetprocess is leveraged to streamline workflows, manage resources efficiently, and ensure alignment with strategic objectives. A key feature is the ability to link OKRs directly to project finan...

Jira vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Endevor vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compared 8% of the time

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compared 6% of the time

BMC AMI DevX vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compared 6% of the time

Rally Software vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Competitors

Jira Align vs Targetprocess

Compared 44% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Targetprocess

Compared 16% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Targetprocess

Compared 15% of the time

Rally Software vs Targetprocess

Compared 12% of the time

Digital.ai Agility vs Targetprocess

Compared 12% of the time

More Targetprocess Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Download IBM Engineering Workflow Management product report

IBM Engineering Workflow Management report

Targetprocess

Download Targetprocess product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC

No data available

Overview

IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

IBM

Targetprocess is a cloud-based enterprise Agile planning platform designed to accelerate business value delivery by bridging strategy and execution seamlessly. It offers a unified view of work spanning teams, departments, and projects, making it effortless to scale Agile practices swiftly. With features like work item management, Kanban and Scrum boards, roadmapping, and robust reporting and analytics, Targetprocess empowers organizations of all sizes to effectively manage their Agile planning needs.

Apptio

Sample Customers

Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT

Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Targetprocess