Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Jira comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.1
IBM Engineering Workflow Management boosted productivity by 30%, improving task tracking and offering valuable insights for scrum teams.
Sentiment score
7.0
Jira offers cost savings and efficiency with initial setup costs, yielding qualitative benefits despite varying feedback on plugin support.
It's always hard to measure ROI precisely, but overall, the development time usually pays off within a year through efficiency gains.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
IBM Engineering Workflow Management's support is generally good, but feedback varies and requires dedicated management for best results.
Sentiment score
6.7
Jira's customer service is well-regarded for online resources, though some desire faster email responses and phone support.
The technical support from IBM rates an eight out of ten.
Jira's customer support is one of the best I have ever dealt with because they respond quickly.
I did not face any issues with stability or upgrades.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is scalable, handling small to large projects; updates promise better reporting, though containerization is missing.
Sentiment score
7.3
Jira effectively supports large teams and user bases with customization options, despite some challenges like hardware needs and costs.
Scalability for Jira is great, and it handles growth easily from 100 to thousands.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.4
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is generally stable, but performance issues and customization challenges affect user experience and stability ratings.
Sentiment score
7.6
Users praise Jira's reliability and smooth operation, noting occasional issues are often linked to server constraints or customization.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Engineering Workflow Management needs UI modernization, better tool integration, improved permissions, and streamlined upgrades to enhance adoption.
Jira users cite difficulties with customization, usability, performance, integrations, native features, scalability, and desire improved reporting and administration.
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management can be improved by enhancing its pricing structure.
Focus more on improving API integration and automation tools, not just the design.
To improve Jira, maybe some AI features could be added.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers complex, costly licensing, yet its effectiveness and ROI justify the investment for many organizations.
Jira's pricing is affordable for small teams but escalates significantly with increased users and plugin needs for enterprises.
Even if only five people from your team use a financial plugin, you still pay for all 100 seats.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Engineering Workflow Management enhances task management with robust traceability, customizable dashboards, and seamless integration for agile adoption.
Jira excels in customization, agile support, and integration, offering flexible workflows, robust reporting, and comprehensive project management features.
The capability of IBM Engineering Workflow Management in managing end-to-end workflows is quite robust, especially with the built-in change management capabilities.
It provides more efficiencies for our scrum team, ensures everyone is on the same page, and offers leadership insight into progress.
You can build your own workflows and make it work exactly the way your team needs and integrate it with almost every third-party software.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (4th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (11th)
Jira
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
276
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (1st), Project Management Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Lifecycle Management solutions, they serve different purposes. IBM Engineering Workflow Management is designed for Enterprise Agile Planning Tools and holds a mindshare of 1.6%, up 0.8% compared to last year.
Jira, on the other hand, focuses on Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites, holds 17.4% mindshare, down 23.2% since last year.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Engineering Workflow Management1.6%
Microsoft Azure DevOps38.1%
GitLab28.6%
Other31.69999999999999%
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Jira17.4%
Microsoft Azure DevOps12.9%
Codebeamer8.8%
Other60.900000000000006%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Suvajit Chakraborty - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use. Anybody can learn it right quickly and start with it. But IBM ELM is something where somebody has to have good knowledge, training, and understanding and then only start using it. But there's a big known knowledge curve for IBM ELM. But once that is there, it's normally; organizations do have their own internal team to basically manage it IBM ELM portfolio, the tool chain. So if they have internal teams who are doing it for quite some time, not something new, then it is definitely better. But if there's if somebody is starting new, definitely there is a knowledge curve time it can take at least a year or maybe a couple of years before they can start realizing the benefits.
Nathan Akimoff - PeerSpot reviewer
Has customized workflows to fit internal processes and improved overall team organization
I don't have a particular customization or integration that's been especially valuable for my team, but I experienced integrating Jira and QuickBooks, which was very challenging, but it really impacted the efficiency of the whole company. I have been working with Jira for over 12 years, and I've seen it grow every year. It's a powerful product, but lately, I think Atlassian has been adding too many simplified features that look nice but don't offer the same level of flexibility, and made some fields not available through the API, which is kind of frustrating. If I could make one suggestion, it would be to focus more on improving API integration and automation tools, not just the design.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Government
16%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business104
Midsize Enterprise56
Large Enterprise149
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
IBM Engineering Workflow Management can be improved by enhancing its pricing structure, specifically the cost and licensing of this solution.
Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?
We operate under a nonlimited license with Jira, allowing a number of users to access it with a single enterprise license.
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
Jira Software
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Jira and other solutions. Updated: March 2023.
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.