

IBM Engineering Workflow Management and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management compete in workflow and portfolio management solutions. IBM Engineering Workflow Management holds the edge due to its comprehensive traceability and agile support.
Features: IBM Engineering Workflow Management excels in end-to-end traceability from requirements to change management, offering strong integrations and agile support. It also integrates configuration management with change management activities and provides customizable dashboards. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management supports strategic alignment with real-time analytics, facilitating resource management. It enables integration with ITSM solutions and offers project portfolio management capabilities.
Room for Improvement: IBM Engineering Workflow Management needs better alignment across tools, improved customization, and easier interfaces. It also faces complex maintenance and integration tasks. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is challenged by high pricing and complexity, requiring enhancements in financial management features and user interface intuitiveness. It faces a steep learning curve and extensive setup requirements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Engineering Workflow Management is deployable on-premises and in public cloud environments but requires specialized IT teams for customization. Its customer service varies in effectiveness. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management offers broad deployment options, including private cloud, and integrates well with ITSM systems. It is praised for good customer support but requires a well-coordinated framework due to configuration needs.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Engineering Workflow Management features complex licensing models like floating or token-based licenses, offering competitive ROI via process efficiencies despite perceived high costs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is costly, especially for medium-sized enterprises, though it generally provides reasonable ROI due to its comprehensive features. Both products face scrutiny over pricing structures, with value for money dependent on organizational scale and integration depth.
For organizations that haven't invested in people and processes, the product is underutilized and seen as overpriced.
The technical support from IBM rates an eight out of ten.
They should improve vendor compliance to align with ServiceNow's strategy.
They have knowledgeable teams across all levels.
Technical support from ServiceNow is good, as the HI ticket system is available for any module, including SPM.
Scalability is critical for our clients as they deal with numerous projects and changes.
Based on my experience, while I am unsure about how scalable ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is, it is very adaptable, and I would rate that an 8.5.
I have not faced any outages or downtime with ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management.
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management can be improved by enhancing its pricing structure.
The integration of artificial intelligence is something my customer is considering for future upgrades.
The recommended export and import functionality could be developed into a real-time scenario to allow seamless data synchronization without manual interventions.
Making the product more cost-beneficial would help more organizations consider investing in it.
If a company is prepared to get a return on the investment, the price is worth it.
A pricing model adjustment is needed for better alignment with customer usage.
It's a bit costly currently.
The capability of IBM Engineering Workflow Management in managing end-to-end workflows is quite robust, especially with the built-in change management capabilities.
It provides more efficiencies for our scrum team, ensures everyone is on the same page, and offers leadership insight into progress.
The platform consolidates multiple offerings into one module, eliminating the need to invest in siloed applications.
Aligning the portfolio with overall strategy and goals is essential for success.
The most valuable features include managing our portfolio, getting a grip on demand in the environment, and making informed decisions about which projects would provide the greatest return.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management | 3.4% |
| IBM Engineering Workflow Management | 2.7% |
| Other | 93.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 26 |
IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers change and task management with seamless integration into development processes. It supports compliance and progress tracking and provides collaborative tools, configuration management integration, and isolated sandboxes.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management aids Agile software development by facilitating project and sprint planning, load distribution, task tracking, and more. It offers comprehensive reporting, traceability, and sophisticated resource management. Users face challenges with loading speed, permissions, complex integrations, and have critiqued customization and pricing. There's a tendency for the system to have a steep learning curve, making plan management cumbersome and upgrades labor-intensive.
What are its key features?In industries like finance and healthcare, IBM Engineering Workflow Management supports Agile methodologies by managing agile projects, development stories, defect tracking, and use cases. It helps integrate custom processes, GRC structures, and supports API and RTP activities, ensuring traceability and compliance in complex environments.
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management offers streamlined project alignment, resource and incident management, and supports ITSM integration with a flexible interface for seamless organizational operation. Providing real-time analytics and hybrid capabilities, it centrally manages portfolios and risks.
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management focuses on integrating diverse methodologies and centralized management, enabling organizations to align projects with strategic goals. It facilitates integrated workflows and seamless integration with platforms such as Microsoft Azure. While delivering powerful reporting features and centralized demand and risk management, it requires some interface enhancements and more robust financial integration. The initial setup can be complex with many features needing customization. Users desire improved real-time reporting and dashboard capabilities, while the pricing can be challenging for smaller entities. Enhanced real-time export-import functionality, advanced resource management, and additional ready-to-use templates are anticipated for better usability.
What are the key features of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is implemented across industries to support project management, resource allocation, and incident and demand management. It aids in aligning project initiatives with corporate objectives, supports integrated workflows with ServiceNow modules, and facilitates contract and vendor management in technology, healthcare, and finance sectors. Users engage with it for Agile development and financial management, benefiting from streamlined operations and enhanced productivity.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.