We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Video and Verizon EdgeCast based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Microsoft, Akamai and others in CDN."I like the user interface. There aren't too many buttons that the audience will have to fiddle with."
"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."
"It's super easy to use and integrate with."
"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."
"They should improve the registration gateway. Currently, you can't do a pre-event registration that's straightforward. You have to do an API to integrate. It would be a lot easier if they had that."
"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."
"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."
"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."
Earn 20 points
IBM Cloud Video is ranked 29th in CDN while Verizon EdgeCast is ranked 12th in CDN with 3 reviews. IBM Cloud Video is rated 8.0, while Verizon EdgeCast is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Video writes "Great user interface and easy to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verizon EdgeCast writes "The product is easy to use and easy to implement, but we have to raise new feature requests frequently because the product is new". IBM Cloud Video is most compared with , whereas Verizon EdgeCast is most compared with Akamai, Edgio Global CDN, Windows Azure CDN, Cloudflare and Azure Front Door.
See our list of best CDN vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
