Hyland OnBase vs Mendix comparison

Read 62 Mendix reviews

6,802 Views
4,081 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and Mendix compete in enterprise content management and application development. Mendix often has the upper hand due to its versatility and value proposition.

Features: Hyland OnBase is known for document management capabilities, workflow automation, and secure storage. Mendix stands out for its flexibility, rapid application development, and integration capabilities. Users find Mendix adaptable to various business needs.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase users suggest better mobile compatibility, more intuitive admin tools, and improved user interface. Mendix users desire enhanced community support, fewer platform bugs, and better documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase provides a structured deployment model but requires significant initial configuration. Mendix offers a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer service. Mendix's ease of use in deployment and strong support are favorable.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase has a higher initial setup cost but offers solid ROI over time due to reliable performance. Mendix has a cost-effective setup and quicker ROI, driven by rapid development capabilities and flexibility. Users find Mendix offers better value for investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Mendix Report (Updated: March 2026).

Hyland OnBase vs. Mendix

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (14th), Enterprise Content Management (6th)

Mendix

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (5th), Agentic Automation (5th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (12th), AI Software Development (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 2.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mendix is 4.1%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mendix	4.1%
Hyland OnBase	2.5%
Other	93.4%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Arjurn Dakash

Project Manager at Deloitte

Workflow automation has transformed case management and reduced errors across our processes

Hyland OnBase is a great tool for document storage and retrieval, automating business processes using workflow, and building applications in WorkView. It saves a lot of time, reduces human errors, and is very cost-effective. Hyland OnBase has drastically improved our business processes and made everyone's jobs easier. Hyland OnBase is a fantastic system that does a lot for my organization. We use it for indexing and storing documents as the main reason we use Hyland OnBase, but it also has many features that we use every day. Workflows are the most common way that our employees interact with Hyland OnBase. We also ingest thousands of documents every day, and with our continued rate of growth, we do not see Hyland OnBase having any trouble handling the added traffic. It is very scalable. The best features Hyland OnBase offers include workflows, document retention and security, document ingesting and indexing, and document retrieval and storage. The user-friendly interface makes it very easy to use and provides a smooth learning curve for new users. Workflow is used to quickly and easily configure and improve business processes. We also have automation through workflow, which saves time and cost. Reporting dashboards allow us to create useful reports to keep personnel informed, making data-driven decisions easier. While we have grown a lot over the past five years, Hyland OnBase has allowed us to maintain our existing workflows rather than hiring additional employees, requiring fewer employees thanks to Hyland OnBase. Since Hyland OnBase is our central repository for all documents, our documents are more secure, allow greater work flexibility, especially for remote work, are more easily accessible, and are smarter. It has changed the way we as a company work. Through workflow automation, we have been able to save a lot of time, with forty to fifty-five percent of time being saved currently.

Read full review

Mitchel Mol BGS

CTO at Blue Green Solutions

Has improved development quality and speed but has introduced persistent IDE slowdowns

In recent years, the IDE has been more buggy and slower, and although there have been more features added, I would like to see more stability, as some areas that used to work for a fairly long time are now slower in my development, which feels like a step back. I choose a seven mainly due to the issues we've faced with slowdowns and bugs during development, while runtime has been very stable, and the overall output on Mendix platform is still good; there is definitely some room for improvement, and I would probably have given it an eight or even a nine if those issues weren't hurting my developer output for the past few years. Overall, Mendix platform is stable, but the IDE could be better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"Hyland OnBase has drastically improved our business processes and made everyone's jobs easier."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"The integrated security saves a lot of time, especially when it comes to setting up user-roles and security. Also, database updates work automatically. There is no need to write queries to update the database, once you make an update."

"The user experience is great."

"The development environment is model-driven. We can use the information from this for our business engineers to make the information models, and they can also execute the model."

"Excellent support is offered for Mendix"

"After implementing Mendix, they reduced by 98% the engineers' relocation, as 98% of the cases are now being done by video calls instead of in-person appointments, which says a lot, even though the company didn't provide any numbers on how much is saved."

"The domain model of Mendix is highly valuable as it allows quick setup and public deployment."

"The best features Mendix offers in my experience include its readiness to go to market, which reduces the effort and time consumed in developing an application end-to-end."

"You can scale the solution."

More Mendix pros

Cons

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"Hyland OnBase could be improved in terms of service support response time."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"Hyland OnBase can be improved by reducing the many different applications that need to be used when being an administrator for this product."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"Occasionally, there is downtime if an upgrade is happening in the application."

"The vendor should focus more on the opinion of the users and make improvements"

"Customization is limited compared to traditional coding, and UI adjustments can feel restrictive."

"Mendix can be improved in that, while it is good at pricing, it lacks a small business budget project for startups wanting to build their portfolio."

"Feature-wise and in terms of technical aspects, Mendix is excellent, but its pricing is steep."

"All software applications have their hiccups, including the Mendix Studio Pro developers program."

"The code refactoring tools could be better, especially for applications running for years. It's not bad, but it could be smoother. Also, writing new widgets can be trickier than it should be for some people, but not if you're familiar with Mendix."

"In the beginning, it is difficult to learn and work with."

More Mendix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"The tool's price is high."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"I would not recommend the solution to small and medium-sized businesses because it’s expensive. It’s great for big organizations. I rate the pricing as a three out of ten."

"Mendix seems a bit expensive. But in terms of wanting to have less developers and higher velocity, the total cost of ownership is fine. It's not cheap, though."

"Mendix is not open source, but its license cost is cheap, particularly when compared to the Appian license. The license model would depend on how many users you have and how many applications you are creating. If you are creating a single app, you just need to have a single app license, so it's free. If you want a multiple app license to cover two thousand or three thousand users, for example, internal users or external users, then you need to pay for the license. There's also a license model for above three thousand or four thousand, or five thousand internal and external users."

"Its cost is higher than competitors. The cost mostly includes licensing. It is charged per user. The cost model could be better. When you have a big company, what does per user mean? If I have a company where I have 40,000 people who will go to access it but only 200 do, how do you license it and who do you pay for? If they hit it once, do you pay for it? The licensing is complex for a big company. It is easy for us to buy all we can eat, get an enterprise license agreement, and call it good."

"There is a license required to use Mendix. The solution's price is high, but it is best suited for enterprise companies that have the budget. It is not for small or medium-sized businesses."

"From a commercial point of view, we would like them to change that they currently sell it as a platform, but as a customer you have to decide upfront the usage of the platform. We would like to have Mendix sell it as a pay as you go model: You pay for what you use, and you don't pay for what you don't use."

"Pricing used to be complex, but Mendix has improved that quite a bit."

"Initially, we started with a year for approximately $25,000, and if we need to expand the number of seats then we will increase it."

More Mendix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

Hyland OnBase could be improved in terms of service support response time. More timely updates to solution software support documentation also should be improved.

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

Hyland OnBase is used across the entirety of the organization in a variety of different ways, and its primary use is as a document storage solution that is used in conjunction with other systems su...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mendix?

I do not have much experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing because the sales or business team usually handles that, and as a developer, I don't have a clear idea.

What needs improvement with Mendix?

I think Mendix can be improved by supporting automated tests more easily. For example, Mendix can add some IDs for each component to build the automation tests more easily.

What is your primary use case for Mendix?

I use Mendix to build a system about the consultation of APIs. We are using Mendix to build a system to check SAP, which is another system, and we use APIs to bring information from SAP to this pro...

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

OutSystems vs Mendix

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Mendix

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Mendix

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow vs Mendix

Compared 4% of the time

Lovable vs Mendix

Compared 4% of the time

More Mendix Competitors

Product Reports

Hyland OnBase

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Download Mendix product report

Also Known As

OnBase

No data available

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Mendix is a low-code application development platform that helps your organization accelerate its application development lifecycle. The solution is designed to enable you to create software faster by abstracting and automating the development process for better business outcomes at speed and scale. Mendix has many key capabilities, including a tailored IDE for every developer, built-in collaboration tools for team development, feedback management, agile project management, the ability to build a truly responsive design across devices, and much more.

Mendix Features

Mendix has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

App development
Multi-experience
Artificial intelligence
Intelligent automation
Data integration
Atlas UI framework
Cloud-native scaling
Single-click deployment
User-based security
Version control
Automated testing
Comprehensive admin suite

Mendix Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Mendix. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Efficient and easy to learn: Mendix allows business users and developers to build and deploy sophisticated multi-channel apps with a model-driven development platform that is much more efficient and easier to learn than traditional technologies.

Simple and responsive UI: Mendix allows business engineers to create an optimal user experience through predefined layouts for smartphone, tablet, and desktop user interfaces.

Native device functions: Mendix offers out-of-the-box widgets for native device functions. Mendix developers who are building a hybrid app can easily drag and drop a widget as a building block into an app without any further coding.

End-to-end mobile app dev flow: Mendix supports the end-to-end mobile app development flow, which makes it simple and intuitive for any developer to build mobile apps that can be part of larger multi-channel applications integrated with back-end apps and services.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Mendix solution.

PeerSpot user Somnath G., Solution Architect and LowCode Practice Lead at a tech services company, says, "What I found most valuable in Mendix is that it's very much suitable for mobile apps such as native Android or IOS supported mobile apps. The multiple features of the platform are very, very attractive and very popular. Mendix has technical features such as microflows and nanoflows. You can also access data models in the platform. These are the features that are very, very strong in Mendix. I got my hands dirty on other low-code platforms, but I have not seen such strong features in them compared to the microflows, nanoflows, and data model access that are in Mendix, including creating and integration. The platform has out-of-the-box adapters or out-of-the-box-connectors that you can integrate with different interface applications such as SAP, Salesforce, Oracle EBS, etc."

Sameer V., Consulting Manager at Deloitte, mentions, “Their native mobile capability is very good. In general, the way they launch the product has been great. Their product launching strategy is far better than any other platform. I work in OutSystems and Mendix. They tend to be more on the legacy side, OutSystems. With this solution, the product launching strategy is very, very agile. I really like when they roll out their updates, which are very, very frequent.”

Robert B., Solutions Architect at a computer software company, explains, The solution is just very quick and responsive. The initial setup is very straightforward, and those implementing the product do not have to be very technologically advanced in order to manage the process.”

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Genzyme, TNT, Yahoo, Capgemini, Roche, D&B, Aegon, kpn, AZL, Sky, Arch, Penn State Univeristy, BancABC

Hyland OnBase vs. Mendix