Honeycomb Enterprise vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager comparison

Honeycomb.io and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Honeycomb.io is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #58. Honeycomb.io holds a 1.4% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Honeycomb.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Honeycomb Enterprise

Read 3 Honeycomb Enterprise reviews

2,551 Views
2,296 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews

645 Views
613 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Honeycomb Enterprise

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and Honeycomb Enterprise compete in application management and monitoring. Based on user feedback, while Tivoli is praised for its affordability and support, Honeycomb Enterprise has the edge with its innovative features and comprehensive capabilities.

Features: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers monitoring, diagnostics, and data collection and analysis. Honeycomb Enterprise provides advanced analytics, visualization tools, and precise forecasting insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager provides a straightforward deployment and strong support, minimizing operational disruptions. Honeycomb Enterprise offers a flexible deployment model, accommodating various environments with comprehensive customer service for a smoother experience.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is more cost-effective upfront, making it suitable for limited budgets and providing satisfactory ROI. Honeycomb Enterprise requires a higher initial investment but delivers significant ROI through enhanced functionality and long-term efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Honeycomb Enterprise vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Honeycomb Enterprise vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Honeycomb Enterprise

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (11th)

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

58th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Honeycomb Enterprise is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Honeycomb Enterprise	1.4%
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager	0.4%
Other	98.2%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Its pattern-matching and code transformation capabilities can be adapted for mass identification and remediation of vulnerable libraries

I asked very specific questions to Mr. Pell about consideration of code security scenarios in pattern design and rules, specifically that tuned with OWASP Top 10. I believe addition of code security focus can be a value-add, though the way Grit architecture is designed and how it works, it is and may not become an alternative choice of code security solutions. Rather, it must be treated as a powerful supplementary tool that augments the existing code security solutions (such as Snyk or Checkmarx) in a DevSecOps or Secure DevOps environment. Anyone interested in learning more on this front or have queries, can get in touch with me for a consulting.

Read full review

Christian Campos

Sales manager at Prodeo Innovation

Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features

Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team."

"The approach offers significant benefits in terms of efficiency, consistency, and proactive security management, particularly valuable for organizations with large, distributed development teams."

"The solution's most valuable features are the queries for the OpenTelemetry events and all the tracing."

"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."

"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."

Cons

"We can make alerts based on static numbers, which may block us from building alerts that could be generic enough or could be serviced."

"The way Grit architecture is designed and how it works, it is and may not become an alternative choice of code security solutions."

"The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team."

"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."

"The user interface was not good."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Government

11%

Healthcare Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Honeycomb.io?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Honeycomb.io?

Although Grit is a tool code code migration and management of technical debt for large chunks of work, we reviewed Grit from the use case of assisting in faster remediation of vulnerable libraries....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Honeycomb.io?

We set up Honeycomb.io on all the services so that we can have all the set traces of the communication between all the services inside the company. This helps us understand where it could be failin...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sentry vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Grafana vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Datadog vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

More Honeycomb Enterprise Competitors

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 28% of the time

IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 28% of the time

Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 22% of the time

IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 22% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2025

Download Honeycomb Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2025

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report

Also Known As

Grit

Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Overview

Honeycomb Enterprise is designed to optimize performance visibility, offering a robust platform for distributed system observability. It provides insights for complex data and aids in faster issue resolution, making it a valuable tool for IT professionals.

This tool is tailored for real-time data tracking and improving system performance efficiency. Enterprises benefit from its capacity to handle large-scale data, ensuring seamless operations and continuity. Honeycomb Enterprise helps teams to tackle data challenges head-on by delivering comprehensive analytics that enhance infrastructure reliability and performance metrics.

What Features Make Honeycomb Enterprise Stand Out?

High-Resolution Visibility: Enables detailed system monitoring to identify issues quickly.
Trace Analysis: Offers powerful tracing of distributed systems for in-depth insights.
Data Scalability: Manages extensive data sets effortlessly for better decision-making.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides instant alerts to preempt potential disruptions.
Collaboration Tools: Facilitates teamwork with integrated tools enhancing productivity.

What Benefits and ROI Can Users Expect?

Reduced Downtime: Faster detection and resolution of issues minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resources leading to lower operational costs.
Improved Decision Making: Enhanced data analytics lead to smarter business strategies.
Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined processes improve team efficiency and output quality.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and technology, Honeycomb Enterprise implementations demonstrate its utility in managing complex data flows and optimizing system reliability. Businesses in these sectors leverage its capabilities to maintain high service standards and operational efficiency.

Honeycomb.io

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.

IBM

Sample Customers

Clover Health, Eaze, Intercom, Fender

Michelin Tire Corp

Buyer's Guide

Honeycomb Enterprise vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

September 2025

Free Report: Honeycomb Enterprise vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Honeycomb Enterprise vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Honeycomb Enterprise vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.