Hitachi NAS Platform vs IBM FlashSystem comparison

Hitachi Vantara and IBM are both solutions in the NAS category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Hitachi Vantara holds a 2.5% mindshare in N, compared to IBM’s 10.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Hitachi NAS Platform

Read 12 Hitachi NAS Platform reviews

792 Views
792 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM FlashSystem

Read 112 IBM FlashSystem reviews

7,642 Views
2,980 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Hitachi NAS Platform

IBM FlashSystem

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Hitachi NAS Platform and IBM FlashSystem compete in the storage solutions market. Hitachi NAS Platform has the upper hand in competitive pricing and customer support, while IBM FlashSystem leads in advanced features and performance.

Features: Hitachi NAS Platform offers robust scalability, integrated data protection, and the ability to handle a high number of users. IBM FlashSystem is valued for high-speed performance, advanced analytics, and comprehensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Hitachi NAS Platform could enhance advanced analytics and integration capabilities, improve data migration processes, and offer more features for demanding environments. IBM FlashSystem could improve setup processes, better address user feedback during complex configurations, and enhance initial cost-effectiveness to appeal to a broader market.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hitachi NAS Platform provides simplified deployment and reliable customer service, supporting quick setup and ease of management. IBM FlashSystem involves a more complex deployment but offers dedicated customer service to manage intricate configurations and support.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi NAS Platform is known for its lower setup cost, attracting budget-conscious buyers with a quicker ROI. IBM FlashSystem commands a higher upfront investment, justified by superior performance and long-term benefits, appealing to those prioritizing technological superiority and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,085 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi NAS Platform

Ranking in NAS

12th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM FlashSystem

Ranking in NAS

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (3rd), All-Flash Storage (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of Hitachi NAS Platform is 2.5%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FlashSystem is 10.3%, down from 13.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM FlashSystem	10.3%
Hitachi NAS Platform	2.5%
Other	87.2%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Mir Gulzar Ahmed

IT Manager at Synergy Computers

Needs standalone functionality but provides a robust NAS solution for existing SAN environments

I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity. The current solution only suits customers who already have a Hitachi SAN environment and want to add NAS protocols like NFS and CIFS. It's not suitable for customers without an existing SAN, as they would first need to acquire the SAN infrastructure before adding NAS functionality.

Read full review

OmarIsmail1

Infrastructure Technical Specialist II at Clicks Group

Offers high performance and dependable support for fast storage needs

The most valuable feature of IBM FlashSystem is its robust back code. When integrated properly into the environment and configured according to the guidelines, it provides a very solid infrastructure that does the job on demand. Additionally, IBM FlashSystem offers competitive pricing and reliable performance. The hardware is dependable, ensuring that it functions effectively when the setup is done correctly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Simple and extremely reliable."

"Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly."

"The Hitachi storage platform is highly scalable and highly available."

"The pricing of this solution is good, which is an advantage that positions this product well."

"Hitachi is reliable with high availability and solid performance. It performs well regardless of the workload."

"There are no other NAS in the current market that can compete with Hitachi in terms of performance."

"The product has valuable features for data migration."

"Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly."

More Hitachi NAS Platform pros

"IBM FlashSystem has been stable in our operations."

"The most valuable features are deduplication and compression, which together, enable you to have more space."

"The most crucial feature of IBM FlashSystem is compression."

"The ability to create LUNs and modify them are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The valuable feature is autoscalling."

"The initial setup is straightforward and can be done in an hour and a half by one person."

"I like most of the features. Its speed, performance, and availability are valuable. We are implementing the data reduction technology the most."

"They have a virtualization feature and, even if you do not want to buy that feature, you can have it as a trial for two to three months. If you have another brand of storage from another company, you can use this tool to transfer all your data from the old system to the new Storwize system, which really shortens the migration time."

More IBM FlashSystem pros

Cons

"Hitachi NAS Platform needs to improve by offering a unified storage solution. Due to budget constraints in regions like Southeast Asia, customers prefer a single machine that can handle all problems, which the current platform does not provide."

"I do not like Hitachi NAS because it's an old-school NAS solution, compared to the other, newer-type solutions such as Isilon from Dell or Qumulo."

"I would like to see the inclusion of support for cloud-connectivity to providers like AWS."

"The monitoring tool is not well developed."

"Hitachi could be more flexible and have a simpler management interface."

"There are insufficient improvements in certain areas."

"I rated Hitachi NAS a seven out of ten, primarily due to the interface or insufficient improvements in certain areas."

"I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity."

More Hitachi NAS Platform cons

"The interface of this solution could be improved."

"One area for improvement is in the GUI, where host clusters are not properly dealt with. With Hypervisor host clusters, all hosts must see the same volumes in the same order. Using the concept of a “host-group” has been around (even with IBM) for many years, so why not with the V7000?"

"This solution needs a management console where we are alerted to issues and can report them, or escalate them through email or another method."

"The only issue my team faced was transferring the data from the old system to IBM FlashSystem, which is an area for improvement in the solution."

"The solution has a low number of NVME host attachments at 16 per IO group over the fiber channel."

"AHV is Acropolis Hypervisor – A relatively new Hypervisor, robust and stable as VMware vSphere, has built-in advanced analytics and powerful operations, Self Service Portal and components for DevOps included, managed by a single pane of glass (Prism) via HTML5 and it is free of charge – That is why Nutanix is so advanced and revolutionary."

"This solution could be improved by offering greater amounts of storage."

"The solution should improve its pricing and the mechanism in the reduction pool."

More IBM FlashSystem cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount."

"It is a highly-priced product."

"I would rate the solution's pricing six to seven out of ten."

"This solution is priced well and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Hitachi NAS Platform’s price is high and depends on SCSI disc capacity."

"Our customers would like IMB FlashSystem to be less expensive."

"The pricing may be a bit higher than other brands. If you compare the IBM FlashSystems in midrange with Dell EMC in midrange, IBM costs a bit more, but I prefer IBM because it has more specs that I can benefit from."

"The pricing is competitive in our country."

"The pricing has been very competitive for the last few years. IBM got to the point where they changed the pricing model and we feel very comfortable with the pricing. It's very competitive. Over the last two years, IBM has been coming up with all kinds of interesting promos, especially for the SMB systems. That makes it very competitive price-wise and in terms of performance..."

"I find the pricing of the solution to be very reasonable."

"This is an expensive product and if the price were reduced it would be better."

"The total storage capacity vs price is still quite high for the IBM Flash Array."

"My customers got the IBM FlashSystem bundle offer. It was a one-time purchase for three years of service. The price would depend on the storage size and could reach between $25,000 to $55,000."

More IBM FlashSystem pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	57

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hiachi NAS Platform?

The pricing for the Hitachi NAS is higher compared to other NAS solutions since the NAS protocol is provided on top of the existing SAN environment, requiring an additional device for NAS functiona...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hiachi NAS Platform?

For the Hitachi NAS Platform, the tools are basic and don't provide much insight. They can continue to improve the interface to keep it up-to-date, and maybe add some new features or better ways of...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hiachi NAS Platform?

We sell the Hitachi NAS Platform, and it is the best product for our customers. I sell it to banks, telecom companies, and other enterprises at the enterprise level. We have a cluster with Hitachi ...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM FlashSystem?

It is simple to make an update.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem?

The pricing is reasonable for IBM FlashSystem.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem?

Some improvements are required in IBM regarding response time and resolution time, though not about competence. Product-wise, it performs well. We have not used AI features yet, and I believe havin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 37% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 16% of the time

NetApp Private Storage vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 12% of the time

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More Hitachi NAS Platform Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 20% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 9% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

NetApp AFF vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM FlashSystem Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

October 2025

Download Hitachi NAS Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM FlashSystem

October 2025

Download IBM FlashSystem product report

Also Known As

Hitachi NAS

IBM Storwize

Overview

Hitachi NAS Platforms help you with file sharing, file server consolidation and application storage for Oracle, Microsoft and virtual environments. Deploy the highest performance per node in the industry. Apply capacity efficiencies that let you actually do more, but with a lot less. Realize significant cost savings for your organization.

Hitachi Vantara

IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.

IBM

Sample Customers

Intersect Australia

Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

November 2025

Free Report: Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.