Guardz vs Trellix DLP comparison

Guardz and Trellix are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Guardz is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0, while Trellix is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Guardz holds a 0.5% mindshare in DLP, compared to Trellix’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Guardz users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Guardz

Read 1 Guardz review

195 Views
29 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix DLP

Read 15 Trellix DLP reviews

1,699 Views
1,186 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Guardz

Trellix DLP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Guardz and Trellix DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Zscaler, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,687 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Guardz

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

32nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (33rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (46th), Ransomware Protection (14th)

Trellix DLP

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Guardz is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix DLP is 5.2%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Steve Bowtell

Managing Director at Cyber Active

Exceptionally easy to integrate and covers a multitude of cybersecurity issues

The solution's interface appears very simple, but it is very complicated in the back end. So, it removes all the complications that an MSP or an MSSP would normally have. The solution's maintenance depends on whether you run it like an MDR platform where you provide the detection response part for the customer. That would normally be the MSP part. Sometimes, you have customers who are just happy to get an email and tell them what the problem is, and they fix it themselves. If there's no in-house expertise, the MSP or the MSSP can do the maintenance. If there's in-house expertise, it's just a matter of advising them. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

GANESAN K

Senior Technical Engineer at Safezone Secure Solutions Private Limited

Distributors highly benefit from advanced data monitoring and seamless integration features

The Machine Learning capability could be improved, particularly in data discovery. When given sensitive data expressions, the system retrieves files that are not always related. The system should adhere strictly to the given expression rather than just focusing on keywords within the expression. In endpoint features, while the detection rate is good, there could be improvements in remediation and rollback solutions during attacks. Other solutions now include such options since providing 100% security is impossible. The flexibility varies across environments. Enterprise customers find the product performs well without affecting their data, with scans running as scheduled. However, SMB customers experience some performance issues during scanning. Since EDR is integrated, users must access the EDR console to check endpoint detections. It would be beneficial if this functionality were incorporated within the EPO console, as the current threat graphs link doesn't display endpoint threat graphs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is exceptionally easy to integrate and covers a multitude of cybersecurity issues."

"Trellix's technical support deserves a perfect rating, and I would rate it ten out of ten compared to other solutions."

"The most effective aspect of Trellix DLP is that it does what it's supposed to do. It is fairly simple to use compared to Proofpoint."

"It prevents enterprises from installing external software and devices and can block specific network pathways."

"Scalability is feasible since it's on-premises. It's easy to scale there."

"The support from both the vendor and Trellix is excellent."

"The solution involves implementing the confidentiality, utility, and availability principles."

"Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature."

"I rate the product an eight out of ten."

More Trellix DLP pros

Cons

"The solution's security awareness training and phishing are very United States-focused and don't work very well in Australia."

"During the initial setup of Trellix DLP, we faced challenges where the Trellix console buffers multiple times, taking time to reload when clicking on features, which needs improvement."

"Trellix DLP can improve by addressing the lack of features such as deep drive DLP and email notifications present in other solutions like Forcepoint."

"I would rate the solution seven out of ten based on my last experience within the last six months. It's a bit of a fallback, and I know they are working on improving scalability."

"Coverage for Mac OS is lacking as features like clipboard and print protection don't function as expected."

"Having someone within a region who understands the countries and how they approach data and information security is sometimes where the problem lies."

"The bugs need improvement."

"Trellix is incompatible with Linux, and its DLP part is incompatible with Mac. Sometimes, it does not work on Windows, either."

"The main challenge we face is with our on-premises Trellix DLP implementation. While we can push the agent, we cannot apply the policy on Azure systems."

More Trellix DLP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like Guardz's pricing model because it's very cost-effective and has no long-term commitments."

"The pricing depends on the number of users in a company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Security Firm

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Guardz?

The solution is exceptionally easy to integrate and covers a multitude of cybersecurity issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Guardz?

I like Guardz's pricing model because it's very cost-effective and has no long-term commitments. You could run it monthly if you want to and then leave.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Guardz?

The solution's security awareness training and phishing are very United States-focused and don't work very well in Australia.

See all answers

What do you like most about Trellix?

Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Trellix?

Technical support for Trellix DLP could be better as we are using multiple types of DLP solutions, such as Forcepoint, Proofpoint, and Trellix. Currently, we don't have any knowledge of the advance...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Trellix?

I have no knowledge about what improvements could be made in Trellix DLP. There is nothing connected with AI at this time. I rate this product as ten points.

See all answers

Comparisons

Coro vs Guardz

Compared 42% of the time

Cynet vs Guardz

Compared 30% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Guardz

Compared 17% of the time

Huntress Managed ITDR vs Guardz

Compared 11% of the time

More Guardz Competitors

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Trellix DLP

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Trellix DLP

Compared 23% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Trellix DLP

Compared 10% of the time

Safetica ONE vs Trellix DLP

Compared 7% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Trellix DLP

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix DLP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Email Security

June 2025

Download Guardz product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix DLP

June 2025

Download Trellix DLP product report

Overview

Guardz enhances cybersecurity measures, focusing on malware protection, phishing prevention, and securing sensitive data. It excels in real-time threat identification and mitigation, featuring an intuitive dashboard and seamless integration without performance compromise.

Guardz provides robust protection, aiding businesses in comprehensive threat detection and industry compliance. It integrates smoothly with existing systems and offers automated responses, customizable alerts, and continuous updates to stay ahead of emerging threats. However, it experiences slow load times, laggy performance, and occasional crashes. Users note the customer support is not always effective, and some features present a learning curve, along with issues integrating certain third-party applications.

What are the key features of Guardz?

Robust Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates cyber threats efficiently.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides ongoing surveillance to catch threats as they emerge.
Ease of Integration: Blends seamlessly with existing systems for smooth operation.
Automated Responses: Handles incidents automatically to minimize damage.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed reports for in-depth analysis.
Customizable Alerts: Allows tailoring of alerts to fit specific needs.
Continuous Updates: Ensures protection against the latest threats.

What are the benefits and ROI users should consider?

Increased Security: Enhanced protection against diverse cyber threats.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines threat detection and response processes.
Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to industry standards.
Performance Stability: Integrates without slowing down systems.
Proactive Threat Management: Stays ahead of emerging threats.

Guardz proves beneficial in industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, where cybersecurity is paramount. Its ability to integrate with existing systems without compromising performance is crucial. Continuous updates and real-time monitoring are critical for sectors dealing with sensitive data, ensuring compliance and robust protection against cyber threats.

Guardz

Trellix DLP is the ultimate data loss prevention (DLP) solution, safeguarding organizations' sensitive data from unauthorized access, disclosure, or alteration. This robust system monitors and regulates data flows across networks, emails, and the web, identifying and shielding various data types such as financial, personal, intellectual property, and regulated data. Employing encryption, access control, DLP policies, and monitoring, it secures data both at rest and in transit, ensuring compliance with data security regulations and industry standards. With customizable deployment options, including on-premises, cloud-based, and hybrid, Trellix DLP offers comprehensive protection and rapid response to data loss incidents.

Trellix

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Zscaler, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.