We performed a comparison between Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Trellix DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is very robust."
"The product is very stable."
"The features I like most about this solution is the endpoint modules because it gives us the protection we need."
"The synchronize application detection policies have been very good."
"I like how I have the possibility to check different channels with the same policy set."
"We can integrate with some other tools such as Splunk, which is very useful."
"DLP's most valuable feature is compliance."
"They have a feature on the management side called the document indexer. Let's say you have a unique document with many near identical versions, which have one or several values that change, while the rest of the content stays the same. You can collect 50 of those documents and put them into this feature of the Symantec DLP system. It will compress them and create a profile specifically for that document."
"It prevents enterprises from installing external software and devices and can block specific network pathways."
"The tool has prebuilt templates for data classification. It is easier for customers to get started."
"Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature."
"Scalability is feasible since it's on-premises. It's easy to scale there."
"What could be improved in Symantec Data Loss Prevention is its security. It should be more secure."
"I would like for the administrator management interface to improve. It's kind of old and slow. Updating it would make this solution better."
"Symantec Data Loss Prevention could improve by having better system resource management, cloud option, and more features."
"The product must improve its interface."
"They could improve the predefined reports because they don't have much information. We would like detailed reports."
"Symantec could be better with infrastructure."
"The console is not the best one. There is room for improvement in the management console."
"The policies need to be improved."
"In future releases, I would like to see like to see encryption available on the cloud-based version."
"Trellix needs to improve customer support."
"The whole UI of the server console installed on the standalone computers is hefty."
"Trellix is incompatible with Linux, and its DLP part is incompatible with Mac. Sometimes, it does not work on Windows, either."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Symantec Data Loss Prevention is ranked 3rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 53 reviews while Trellix DLP is ranked 21st in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews. Symantec Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Trellix DLP is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Symantec Data Loss Prevention writes "Consitent, accurate, and simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix DLP writes "Comes in a single console: Emission, endpoint security, everything in one product, one agent". Symantec Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Zscaler DLP and Amazon Macie, whereas Trellix DLP is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP). See our Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
