Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager comparison

Google and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Google is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #61. Google holds a 1.1% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud's operations s...

Read 10 Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) reviews

2,327 Views
1,462 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews

538 Views
276 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Google Cloud's operations s...

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Both IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and Google Cloud's operations suite compete in application performance management. Google Cloud's operations suite seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and user satisfaction.

What features are offered by IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers detailed monitoring, issue resolution capabilities, and an extensive analytics and alerting system. Google Cloud's operations suite provides seamless integration with Google services, strong logging, monitoring, and debugging features, and advanced diagnostics.

What areas of improvement can be found in IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager needs improvements in interface responsiveness, mobile accessibility, and usability aspects. Google Cloud's operations suite requires better error messaging, deeper integration with third-party platforms, and enhancements in functionality.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has mixed reviews for deployment complexity but strong customer support. Google Cloud's operations suite is noted for straightforward deployment and self-help resources, though its customer service could be more responsive.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is cost-effective with good ROI. Google Cloud's operations suite has higher setup costs, but its advanced features justify the expense by enhancing operational efficiencies, leading to a significant ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,585 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud's operations s...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (31st), Cloud Monitoring Software (21st)

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

61st

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 1.1%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Anand_Patel

Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations

As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or BigQuery can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings.

Read full review

Christian Campos

Sales manager at Prodeo Innovation

Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features

Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Google's technical support is very good."

"I like the monitoring feature."

"The features that I have found most valuable are its graphs - if I need any statistics, in Kubernetes or Kong level or VPN level, I can quickly get the reports."

"The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS."

"It's easy to use."

"Provides visibility into the performance uptime."

"Our company has a corporate account for Google Cloud and so our systems and clusters integrate really well."

"We find the solution to be stable."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) pros

"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."

"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."

Cons

"It could be even more automated."

"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver."

"The product provides minimal metrics that are insufficient."

"It could be more stable."

"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."

"The process of logging analytics can be improved"

"It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) cons

"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."

"The user interface was not good."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost could be lower."

"We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

37%

Government

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Stackdriver?

If the errors are caught early in the interface, it would be easier for users to manage. The process of logging analytics can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Stackdriver?

I use the solution for logging, defining alerts, and monitoring. Our company's Java and Python logging teams mainly use it.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Stackdriver?

The Ops Agent and logging transport feature of the solution have had a major impact on improving application performance. The solution also allows the transport of logs into log buckets, which is h...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 29% of the time

Datadog vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 20% of the time

New Relic vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 6% of the time

Prometheus Group vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Competitors

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 36% of the time

IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 24% of the time

Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 21% of the time

IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 19% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2025

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report

Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2025

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report

Also Known As

Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring

Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Overview

Real-time log management and analysis

Cloud Logging is a fully managed service that performs at scale and can ingest application and platform log data, as well as custom log data from GKE environments, VMs, and other services inside and outside of Google Cloud. Get advanced performance, troubleshooting, security, and business insights with Log Analytics, integrating the power of BigQuery into Cloud Logging.

Built-in metrics observability at scale

Cloud Monitoring provides visibility into the performance, uptime, and overall health of cloud-powered applications. Collect metrics, events, and metadata from Google Cloud services, hosted uptime probes, application instrumentation, and a variety of common application components. Visualize this data on charts and dashboards and create alerts so you are notified when metrics are outside of expected ranges.

Stand-alone managed service for running and scaling Prometheus

Managed Service for Prometheus is a fully managed Prometheus-compatible monitoring solution, built on top of the same globally scalable data store as Cloud Monitoring. Keep your existing visualization, analysis, and alerting services, as this data can be queried with PromQL or Cloud Monitoring.

Monitor and improve your application's performance

Application Performance Management (APM) combines the monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities of Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring with Cloud Trace and Cloud Profiler to help you reduce latency and cost so you can run more efficient applications.

Google

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.

IBM

Sample Customers

Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games

Michelin Tire Corp

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

June 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.