GitLab vs Venn Software comparison

GitLab and Venn Software are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while Venn Software is ranked #59. GitLab holds a 2.7% mindshare in AS, compared to Venn Software’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Venn Software users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

3,135 Views
2,310 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Venn Software

Read 3 Venn Software reviews

136 Views
33 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

Venn Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

GitLab and Venn Software compete in the tech industry, particularly in software development tools and enterprise solutions. GitLab holds an edge in pricing and support, while Venn Software leads in superior features, with some users finding the investment worthwhile.

Features: GitLab is recognized for its comprehensive integration capabilities, robust collaboration tools, and flexibility. It facilitates seamless teamwork and supports a variety of third-party tools. Venn Software stands out in advanced security features, user-friendly navigation, and specialized functionalities, which are particularly valuable for niche applications.

Room for Improvement: GitLab users note the need for enhancements in performance speed, clearer documentation, and more intuitive UI. On the other hand, Venn Software users seek more customization options, improved scalability, and a more streamlined user interface. GitLab’s need for speed upgrades contrasts with Venn’s demand for adaptability and feature enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab is favored for its simple deployment model and responsive customer service, simplifying the implementation process. Venn Software requires a more complex setup but provides dedicated support to aid deployment, ensuring users are supported throughout the setup process. GitLab’s straightforward initial deployment is counterbalanced by Venn Software’s comprehensive setup guidance.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab is found to offer competitive setup costs and satisfactory ROI, providing a cost-effective solution for baseline needs. Venn Software demands a higher initial investment yet delivers significant ROI, with users often justifying the cost by the long-term benefits of premium features. GitLab suits users focused on cost-effectiveness, while Venn Software attracts those ready to invest in advanced features and future gains.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Venn Software Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Venn Software

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Venn Software

Ranking in Application Security Tools

59th

Average Rating

9.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (31st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.7%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Venn Software is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

reviewer2110356

Growth Specialist at Digitrends Soultions

Great for hybrid workers, minimizes latency and delivers great performance

We haven't encountered major issues with the solution. We are really happy that we decided to purchase Venn Software, although they are quite new. The initial setup is seamless. It's not overly complex. In our experience, for the most part, the solution is reliable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches. That said, the performance could be a bit better. We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities. The solution needs to offer better local or regional support to cater to offshore users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In our software development lifecycle, GitLab is used as a component for code repository management. We use GitLab for several projects to handle code repositories. For other software projects, we use Bitbucket, but the use case for both is very similar."

"The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good."

"I like GitLab from the CI/CD perspective. It is much easier to set up CI/CD and then integrate with other tools."

"It is very flexible and easy because you can store data on cloud."

"The CI/CD pipeline with Helm has significantly improved deployment speed and efficiency."

"The most valuable aspects of GitLab are the ability to create branches, merge branches, and compare branches to resolve code conflicts."

"I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software."

"The most valuable feature of GitLab is the automatic merging of code."

More GitLab pros

"We don't need to go to the physical office, and it only requires minimal supervision or assistance from our IT Team."

"Since the software is launched directly from the computer, not remotely delivered, it has minimized latency and response time."

"It allows us to improve our security and prevent company files and data leaks."

Cons

"The licensing model could be improved to be more accommodating in terms of user numbers and costs."

"It has fewer options, and its UI is not so user-friendly."

"While GitLab is a great tool for developers, it lacks project planner features. Roadmaps and Gantt charts in GitLab are not as advanced as in Jira, and changing start and end dates is more laborious in GitLab."

"GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker."

"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain."

"The solution should again offer an on-premises deployment option."

"The documentation is confusing."

"I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira."

More GitLab cons

"We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities."

"It would be better to have the back end more efficient."

"Currently, Venn only uses two platforms/applications: Windows and Mac. It would be great if they could also add more platforms since some BYOD employees might be using an application other than Windows or Mac - for example, Linux."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"GitLab is highly priced for smaller teams, but it's okay if considering a user base of thousands."

"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"There are different licensing options available, including a free limited-user license."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

12%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 16% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 6% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Venn Software

Compared 67% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Venn Software

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Venn Software

Compared 13% of the time

More Venn Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

June 2025

Download Venn Software product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Venn Software is a powerful platform lauded for its robust features, intuitive UI, and responsive customer support. Users appreciate its scalability, customization options, and seamless integration capabilities. However, a few reviews mention occasional performance issues and a steep learning curve, making it challenging for beginners. Based on user reviews, Venn Software provides a reliable solution for businesses seeking advanced functionality, but newcomers may require additional time and support to fully utilize its potential.

Venn Software

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Venn is currently being used by 700+ organizations. The newest version of our secure workspace is selling not only to our existing customer base but to new companies like Voya, ModSquad, TTech and many others.

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Venn Software

June 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Venn Software

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Venn Software and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Venn Software report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.