GitLab vs Octopus Deploy comparison

GitLab and Octopus Deploy are both solutions in the Release Automation category. GitLab is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Octopus Deploy is ranked #13. GitLab holds a 32.1% mindshare in RA, compared to Octopus Deploy’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Octopus Deploy users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 82 GitLab reviews

10,944 Views
8,958 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Octopus Deploy

Read 3 Octopus Deploy reviews

987 Views
611 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

Octopus Deploy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

GitLab and Octopus Deploy are focused on different stages in the DevOps lifecycle, with GitLab emphasizing collaborative development and Octopus Deploy targeting deployment automation. GitLab often has the advantage due to its comprehensive collaboration features and integration capabilities, while Octopus Deploy is favored for its specialized deployment management.

Features: GitLab offers version control, CI/CD integration, and project management tools, making it versatile for developers in search of an all-encompassing platform. Octopus Deploy provides deployment automation, advanced release management, and seamless environment configurations, essential for intricate deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab provides a user-friendly deployment model with integrated customer support, ensuring a simple user experience. Octopus Deploy addresses the needs of enterprises with complex environments through robust deployment tools and responsive support, enhancing the deployment phase.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab has a competitive pricing structure, making it a cost-effective choice given its expansive features. Octopus Deploy's pricing matches its specialization in deployment, offering valuable returns on investment where advanced release management is prioritized.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Octopus Deploy Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Octopus Deploy

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Release Automation

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (9th), Build Automation (1st), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (12th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)

Octopus Deploy

Ranking in Release Automation

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of GitLab is 32.1%, down from 34.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Octopus Deploy is 2.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

Boosted productivity with automated pipelines and seamless collaboration

There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files. Improvements could be made regarding size management and file partitioning. Also, the UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.

Read full review

AbhishekSingh11

Infrastructure Solutions Architect at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Easy to set up with intuitive UI and good reliability

I haven't used support. Since it is on-prem, our tech support would manage to troubleshoot. There might have been instances where there have been some issues with the on-prem version that I don't know of. Our tech support may have touched base with the. However, I don't have that level of visibility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The merging feature makes it easy later on for the deployment."

"The CI/CD pipeline with Helm has significantly improved deployment speed and efficiency."

"GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable."

"Of all available products, it was the easiest to use and easy to install."

"As a developer, this solution is useful as a repository holder because most of the POC projects that we have are on GitLab."

"It scales well."

"I like GitLab from the CI/CD perspective. It is much easier to set up CI/CD and then integrate with other tools."

"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."

More GitLab pros

"The rollback feature has been most valuable. We can write scripts from scratch. Octopus maintains an independent package for every deployment."

"Deployment is valuable. It deploys well."

"The UI is very intuitive."

Cons

"There is a need to improve or adopt AI into the ecosystem like a co-pilot, which Microsoft has done with GitHub."

"The solution does not have many built-in functions or variables so scripting is required."

"For as long as I have used GitLab, I haven't encountered any major limitations. However, I think that perhaps the search functionality could be better."

"It is a little complex to set up the pipelines within the solution."

"GitLab could improve by having more plugins and better user-friendliness."

"GitLab doesn't have AWS integration. It would be better to have integration with other container management environments beyond Kubernetes. It has very good integration with Kubernetes, but it doesn't have good integration with, for example, AWS, ETS, etc."

"The solution could improve by providing more integration into the CI/CD pipeline, an autocomplete search tool, and more supporting documentation."

"Atlassian offers more products than GitLab. GitLab offers source control management, version control and collaboration between developers. Atlassian offers features on top of this as well as more integration points for developers."

More GitLab cons

"There could be scope for more integration with other platforms."

"This solution could be improved by making it easier to divide variables in YAML file or JSON files."

"You've got to jump through a few hoops to get some things configured, but if set up, you can do so many different things in it. So, there is complexity."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"We are using the open-source version."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"My company uses the free version of GitLab, which is GitLab Community Edition. There is a licensed version also available for GitLab."

"GitLab is comparatively expensive, but it provides value because it's feature-rich."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

"It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"I don't know the exact cost, but it's not exorbitant. It may be a couple of thousand dollars a year or something like that. I'm not sure, but it's reasonable. We get value for money out of it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

24%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

37%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Certain features in Jira are not available in GitLab, such as the functionality to have weights at the milestone and epic levels. Hopefully, these features will be resolved with work items in GitLa...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 26% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 14% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Spinnaker vs Octopus Deploy

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Octopus Deploy

Compared 21% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs Octopus Deploy

Compared 21% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Octopus Deploy

Compared 15% of the time

More Octopus Deploy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

April 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

April 2025

Download Octopus Deploy product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Octopus Deploy is the most popular deployment automation tool in the world. Our software is used by teams to deploy .NET, Java, Node, and database applications, to hundreds and thousands of servers in the cloud and on-premises.

Octopus Deploy

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Microsoft, NASA, Cisco, Domain, HP, Symantec, 3M, Philips

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Octopus Deploy

April 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Octopus Deploy

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Octopus Deploy and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Octopus Deploy report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.