Octopus Deploy vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Octopus Deploy and Red Hat are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Octopus Deploy is ranked #11, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Octopus Deploy holds a 2.0% mindshare in RA, compared to Red Hat’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Octopus Deploy users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Octopus Deploy

Read 3 Octopus Deploy reviews

657 Views
657 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Read 71 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews

9,486 Views
1,328 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Octopus Deploy

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 28, 2025

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Octopus Deploy are products in the automation and deployment space. Octopus Deploy has the upper hand in features, whereas Red Hat excels in pricing and support.

Features:Red Hat Ansible provides comprehensive automation capabilities, integrates with multiple systems, and effectively manages tasks. Octopus Deploy focuses on deployment processes, intricate release management, and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Octopus Deploy is known for straightforward deployment and robust customer service. Red Hat Ansible faces a steeper learning curve but has extensive support documentation.

Pricing and ROI:Red Hat Ansible offers competitive pricing with long-term cost-effectiveness due to scalable automation. Octopus Deploy may have higher setup costs but delivers quicker ROI with streamlined deployment efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Octopus Deploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Octopus Deploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Octopus Deploy

Ranking in Release Automation

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Ranking in Release Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st), AWS Pro Service Providers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of Octopus Deploy is 2.0%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 4.2%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform	4.2%
Octopus Deploy	2.0%
Other	93.8%

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

AbhishekSingh11

Infrastructure Solutions Architect at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Easy to set up with intuitive UI and good reliability

I haven't used support. Since it is on-prem, our tech support would manage to troubleshoot. There might have been instances where there have been some issues with the on-prem version that I don't know of. Our tech support may have touched base with the. However, I don't have that level of visibility.

Read full review

Sudhir Kumar Tiwari

DevOps Engineer at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Have managed thousands of servers with streamlined configuration processes

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is very helpful due to passwordless integration and the ability to interact with multiple servers at once, which is especially advantageous when dealing with thousands of servers. The integration aspect of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has optimized my IT ecosystem significantly by consolidating multiple tools, such as a CI/CD pipeline with Jenkins, where we validate everything, including testing and SonarQube code quality. The agentless architecture of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, using the SSH key, makes it passwordless and allows us to push configurations with one click, creating a major advantage. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's main benefit is that it allows us to push configurations to multiple servers without manually visiting each one, maintaining efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The UI is very intuitive."

"Deployment is valuable. It deploys well."

"The rollback feature has been most valuable. We can write scripts from scratch. Octopus maintains an independent package for every deployment."

"I like the agentless feature. This means we don't install any agent in worker nodes."

"The playbooks and the code the solution uses are quite useful."

"It has improved our organization through provisioning and security hardening. When we do get a new VM, we have been able to bring on a provisioned machine in less than a day. This morning alone, I provisioned two machines within an hour. I am talking about hardening, installing antivirus software on it, and creating user accounts because the Playbooks were predesigned. From the time we got the servers to the actual hand-off, it takes less than an hour. We are talking about having the servers actually authenticate Red Hat Satellites and run the yum updates. All of that can be done within an hour."

"The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching."

"The biggest thing I liked about Ansible is the check mode so that we can verify, after we've pushed, that the config there is actually what we intended."

"The automation capabilities streamline deployment processes, providing reliability and reducing manual intervention and errors."

"The initial setup is easy and takes a few hours to complete."

"The automation manager is very good."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

Cons

"There could be scope for more integration with other platforms."

"This solution could be improved by making it easier to divide variables in YAML file or JSON files."

"You've got to jump through a few hoops to get some things configured, but if set up, you can do so many different things in it. So, there is complexity."

"In Community, there's a lot of effort towards testing, standardizing, and testing for module development to role development, which is why Molecule is now becoming real. Same thing with Zuul, which we are starting to implement. Zulu tests out modules from third-party sources, like ourselves, and verifies that the modules work before they are committed to the code. Currently, Ansible can't do this with all the modules out there."

"Performance has been an issue on larger environments, but it has gotten a lot better over the past two years."

"What I would like to see is a refined Dashboard to see, when I log in: Here are all my jobs, here are how many times they've executed; some kind graphical stitching-together of the workflows and jobs, and how they're connected. Also, those "failed hosts," what does that mean? We have a problem, a failed host can be anything. Is SSH the reason it failed? Is the job template why it failed? It doesn't really distinguish that."

"The area which I feel can be improved is the custom modules. For example, there are something like 106 official modules available in the Ansible library. A year ago, that number was somewhere around 58. While Ansible is improving day by day, this can be improved more. For instance, when you need to configure in the cloud, you need to write up a module for that."

"The support could be better."

"It needs better documentation."

"Some of the modules in Ansible could be a bit more mature. There is still a little room for further development. Some performance aspects could be improved, perhaps in the form of parallelism within Ansible."

"The SSM connection access needs improvement"

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't know the exact cost, but it's not exorbitant. It may be a couple of thousand dollars a year or something like that. I'm not sure, but it's reasonable. We get value for money out of it."

"We use the open-source version of the solution."

"It’s an open-source tool."

"We have to be mindful of how we use Ansible because of the licensing model. I am not saying that it is unfair or we do not find value in it. Because we are trying to automate so many different things, we have to be mindful of what we are doing and how we are doing it because we are trying to stay in compliance with it."

"We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat."

"Users have to pay a per-node cost of around $ 100 per node."

"If you only need to use Ansible, it's free for any end-user, but when you require Ansible Tower, you need to pay per Ansible Tower server."

"Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right now."

"Everything is generally fair. No one ever likes to pay a lot of money, but we are getting the value. We also get support with it. It has been fair and worthwhile."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.

See all answers

Comparisons

Spinnaker vs Octopus Deploy

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Octopus Deploy

Compared 19% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs Octopus Deploy

Compared 17% of the time

AWS CodeDeploy vs Octopus Deploy

Compared 16% of the time

GitLab vs Octopus Deploy

Compared 11% of the time

More Octopus Deploy Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

December 2025

Download Octopus Deploy product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

January 2026

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS

Overview

Octopus Deploy is the most popular deployment automation tool in the world. Our software is used by teams to deploy .NET, Java, Node, and database applications, to hundreds and thousands of servers in the cloud and on-premises.

Octopus Deploy

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.

What benefits and ROI should one consider?

Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Microsoft, NASA, Cisco, Domain, HP, Symantec, 3M, Philips

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

Buyer's Guide

Octopus Deploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Octopus Deploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Octopus Deploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Octopus Deploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.