GitGuardian Platform vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitGuardian Logo
2,404 views|386 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Trend Micro Logo
69 views|12 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitGuardian Platform and Trend Micro Cloud App Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"GitGuardian has pretty broad detection capabilities. It covers all of the types of secrets that we've been interested in... [Yet] The "detector" concept, which identifies particular categories or types of secrets, allows an organization to tweak and tailor the configuration for things that are specific to its environment. This is highly useful if you're particularly worried about a certain type of secret and it can help focus attention, as part of early remediation efforts.""The breadth of the solution detection capabilities is pretty good. They have good categories and a lot of different types of secrets... it gives us a great range when it comes to types of secrets, and that's good for us.""What is particularly helpful is that having GitGuardian show that the code failed a check enables us to automatically pass the resolution to the author. We don't have to rely on the reviewer to assign it back to him or her. Letting the authors solve their own problems before they get to the reviewer has significantly improved visibility and reduced the remediation time from multiple days to minutes or hours. Given how time-consuming code reviews can be, it saves some of our more scarce resources.""Presently, we find the pre-commit hooks more useful.""When they give you a description of what happened, it's really easy to follow and to retest. And the ability to retest is something that you don't have in other solutions. If a secret was detected, you can retest if it is still there. It will show you if it is in the history.""The most valuable feature is the alerts when secrets are leaked and we can look at particular repositories to see if there are any outstanding problems. In addition, the solution's detection capabilities seem very broad. We have no concerns there.""Some of our teams have hundreds of repositories, so filtering by team saves a lot of time and effort.""GitGuardian has also helped us develop a security-minded culture. We're serious about shift left and getting better about code security. I think a lot of people are getting more mindful about what a secret is."

More GitGuardian Platform Pros →

"It has more intelligence features than other vendors.""Dependable with ease of integration with other security products.""Trend Micro has DLP features in it, which separates it from other solutions.""The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is its stability across all platforms.""The solution is easy to integrate.""The initial setup is pretty straightforward.""Our business emails are very important and Trend Micro Cloud App Security has provided a high level of protection. Additionally, there are updating the solution frequently.""Trend Micro Cloud App is easy to use and easy to install."

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security Pros →

Cons
"An area for improvement is the front end for incidents. The user experience in this area could be much better.""It took us a while to get new patterns introduced into the pattern reporting process.""They could give a developer access to a dashboard for their team's repositories that just shows their repository secrets. I think more could be exposed to developers.""There are some features that are lacking in GitGuardian. The more we grow and the more engineers we have, the more it will become difficult to assign an incident because the assignment is not automatic. I know they are working on that and we are waiting for it.""We have been somewhat confused by the dashboard at times.""GitGuardian encompasses many secrets that companies might have, but we are a Microsoft-only organization, so there are some limitations there in terms of their honey tokens. I'd like for it to not be limited to Amazon-based tokens. It would be nice to see a broader set of providers that you could pick from.""There is room for improvement in its integration for bug-tracking. It should be more direct. They have invested a lot in user management, but they need to invest in integrations. That is a real lack.""There is room for improvement in GitGuardian on Azure DevOps. The implementation is a bit hard there. This is one of the things we requested help with. I would not say their support is not good, but they need them to improve in helping customers on that side."

More GitGuardian Platform Cons →

"In the next release, I would like to see the cost go down.""It would be great if Trend Mail Cloud App Security would be joined with a web security solution, making it a multiple-network solution.""The solution's technical support services could be better.""There is room for improvement in the DLP component of Trend Micro Cloud App Security.""The granulation of the policy setup needs to be better. Right now, it is too basic.""Documentation could be improved; product cost is quite high.""They should provide separate corporate-level licenses for two to three instances.""The price of the solution could improve by being lower."

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."
  • "It's a little bit expensive."
  • "You get what you pay for. It's one of the more expensive solutions, but it is very good, and the low false positive rate is a really appealing factor."
  • "The pricing and licensing are fair. It isn't very expensive and it's good value."
  • "The internal side is cheap per user. It is annual pricing based on the number of users."
  • "We have seen a return on investment. The amount of time that we would have spent manually doing this definitely outpaces the cost of GitGuardian. It is saving us about $35,000 a year, so I would say the ROI is about $20,000 a year."
  • "It could be cheaper. When GitHub secrets monitoring solution goes to general access and general availability, GitGuardian might be in a little bit of trouble from the competition, and maybe then they might lower their prices. The GitGuardian solution is great. I'm just concerned that they're not GitHub."
  • "It's not cheap, but it's not crazy expensive either."
  • More GitGuardian Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of the license is on the high side. It's a yearly subscription."
  • "The price of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is expensive for regular users. There are not any hidden fees. First-time users of the solution should purchase implementation packages or professional services."
  • "The solution's price is mid-ranged."
  • "The product's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors."
  • "The pricing of the solution could be better."
  • More Trend Micro Cloud App Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smaller… more »
    Top Answer:The purchasing process is convoluted compared to Snyk, the other tool we use. It's like night and day because you only need to punch in your credit card, and you're set. With GitGuardian, getting a… more »
    Top Answer:GitGuardian had a really nice feature that allowed you to compare all the public GitHub repositories against your code base and see if your code leaked. They discontinued it for some reason about… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is its stability across all platforms.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in the DLP component of Trend Micro Cloud App Security. It currently feels very American-centric, and I would like to see better integration with Microsoft's traditional… more »
    Top Answer:We use Trend Micro Cloud App Security to enhance the security of our cloud systems, including Microsoft 365, SharePoint, Teams, and email clients. While our primary focus is on malware and ransomware… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,404
    Comparisons
    386
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    1,332
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    69
    Comparisons
    12
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    395
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    GitGuardian Internal Monitoring
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitGuardian helps organizations detect and fix vulnerabilities in source code at every step of the software development lifecycle. With GitGuardian’s policy engine, security teams can monitor and enforce rules across their VCS, DevOps tools, and infrastructure-as-code configurations.

    Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by more than 500,000 developers and is the #1 app in the security category on the GitHub Marketplace. GitGuardian is also trusted by leading companies, including Instacart, Genesys, Orange, Iress, Beyond Identity, NOW: Pensions, and Stedi.

    GitGuardian Platform includes automated secrets detection and remediation. By reducing the risks of secrets exposure across the SDLC, GitGuardian helps software-driven organizations strengthen their security posture and comply with frameworks and standards.

    Its detection engine is trained against more than a billion public GitHub commits every year, and it covers 350+ types of secrets such as API keys, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, and more.

    GitGuardian brings security and development teams together with automated remediation playbooks and collaboration features to resolve incidents fast and in full. By pulling developers closer to the remediation process, organizations can achieve higher incident closing rates and shorter fix times.

    The platform integrates across the DevOps toolchain, including native support for continuously scanning VCS platforms like GitHub, Gitlab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket or CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, Travis CI, GitLab pipelines, and many more. It also integrates with ticketing and messaging systems like Splunk, PagerDuty, Jira and Slack to support teams with their incident remediation workflows. GitGuardian is offered as a SaaS platform but can also be hosted on-premise for organizations operating in highly regulated industries or with strict data privacy requirements.

    Advanced threat and data protection for Microsoft Office 365, Google G Suite, and cloud file-sharing services

    Sample Customers
    Automox, 66degrees (ex Cloudbakers), Iress, Now:Pensions, Payfit, Orange, BouyguesTelecom, Seequent, Stedi, Talend, Snowflake... 
    MedImpact Healthcare Systems, ClubCorp USA, Copa Airlines, Aava, Azra Solutions, BSN INET Co, Ltd, Carhartt
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Insurance Company11%
    Wholesaler/Distributor11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Media Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization63%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Government3%
    Real Estate/Law Firm3%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise71%
    Large Enterprise19%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitGuardian Platform vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Platform vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitGuardian Platform is ranked 8th in Application Security Tools with 23 reviews while Trend Micro Cloud App Security is ranked 25th in Application Security Tools with 8 reviews. GitGuardian Platform is rated 9.0, while Trend Micro Cloud App Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GitGuardian Platform writes "It dramatically improved our ability to detect secrets, saved us time, and reduced our mean time to remediation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Cloud App Security writes "A straightforward setup and good reliability with useful security capabilities". GitGuardian Platform is most compared with SonarQube, Cycode, GitHub Advanced Security, Snyk and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, whereas Trend Micro Cloud App Security is most compared with Forcepoint ZT CDR (Zero Trust Content Disarm & Reconstruction), Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), WithSecure Cloud Protection for Salesforce, Joe Sandbox Ultimate and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. See our GitGuardian Platform vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.