GFI LanGuard vs Scalefusion comparison

GFI and Scalefusion are both solutions in the Patch Management category. GFI is ranked #16, while Scalefusion is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0. GFI holds a 2.4% mindshare in PM, compared to Scalefusion’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Scalefusion users who would recommend it.

GFI LanGuard

Read 11 GFI LanGuard reviews

1,158 Views
1,146 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Scalefusion

Read 3 Scalefusion reviews

1,347 Views
269 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GFI LanGuard

Scalefusion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

GFI LanGuard and Scalefusion offer robust solutions for network security and device management, respectively. Scalefusion seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive mobile device management capabilities.

Features: GFI LanGuard is praised for its network vulnerability scanning, automatic patch management, and integration capabilities. Scalefusion is commended for remote configurations, app management, and real-time device monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Users note that GFI LanGuard could improve its user-friendliness, update speeds, and reduce false positives in scans. For Scalefusion, reviews point out occasional performance lags, the need for more frequent updates, and enhanced customer support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GFI LanGuard is deemed straightforward to deploy but requires technical expertise for optimal use, and users praise its responsive customer service. Scalefusion is noted for its relatively easy setup process and user-friendly management console. However, Scalefusion's customer service receives mixed reviews.

Pricing and ROI: Reviews indicate that GFI LanGuard offers competitive pricing and delivers a solid return on investment. Scalefusion, while perceived as slightly more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to its extensive features and effective device management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. Scalefusion Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Scalefusion

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard

Ranking in Patch Management

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Scalefusion

Ranking in Patch Management

22nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Filtering (10th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (9th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (14th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 2.4%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Scalefusion is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GFI LanGuard	2.4%
Scalefusion	1.1%
Other	96.5%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Thanu Kishore

Technical Executive at Satcom Infotech

Effective patch management boosts network security and enhances compliance reporting

The product is currently on-premise, and I think the cloud option is still yet to come. If a customer has their own cloud, we can host it there, but the SaaS model is not available, and most companies are requesting the SaaS model for patch management. GFI LanGuard is a good competitor in the market and is popular in my region. We get many leads and numerous requirements for patch management, but most companies ask for the SaaS model, which creates challenges. Third-party app integration needs to be increased in GFI LanGuard. It shouldn't be limited to 30 or 40 applications because there are many applications being used. Instead of manually patching everything, if those patches are included in the product, it would be easier for automatic patching.

Read full review

Sipho Ngubonde

Admin at IEC (Electoral Commission of South Africa)

It has significantly increased the amount of work we can perform, but blocking devices could be easier.

It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button. Currently, we have to sift through different groups to block a device. It would be nice if Scalefusion allowed me to block without moving the device to a different profile. Another helpful feature they could add is the ability to migrate from one MDM to another. I'd also appreciate more extensive cloud storage. They give you 1 GB by default, but sometimes that's not enough.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that the solution can block users from unnecessarily putting devices on the network."

"This product is a great solution at a great price as long as it is only going to be used for a local area network."

"The solution is easy to use and integrates well with other operating systems."

"The initial setup was easy."

"The most valuable feature is that I am able to patch third-party solutions."

"The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others."

"It is helpful to patch and scan vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature."

More GFI LanGuard pros

"Its enhanced support for iOS and Windows devices has been particularly beneficial, expanding our service offerings to customers with diverse device environments."

"Scalefusion is easy to use, and they have a broad knowledge base, so you can quickly find answers if you're unsure how to do something. The articles on the knowledge base are well-written, with clear steps on what to do for a specific scenario. That part is well documented."

Cons

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding more modules, such as asset control or asset inventory."

"GFI LanGuard could improve the rollback feature. If we have installed the wrong we have had some issues with the rollback function. Additionally, more input from GFI LanGuard for the custom software push install."

"If GFI LanGuard had a cloud version it would be better for people that are working from home."

"The version we are using only allows one person to use it at a time and does not allow multi-users."

"When you want to uninstall software from an endpoint, sometimes it becomes very problematic."

"The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes."

"GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines."

"The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."

More GFI LanGuard cons

"It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button. Currently, we have to sift through different groups to block a device. It would be nice if Scalefusion allowed me to block without moving the device to a different profile. Another helpful feature they could add is the ability to migrate from one MDM to another. I'd also appreciate more extensive cloud storage. They give you 1 GB by default, but sometimes that's not enough."

"One area for improvement could be streamlining permissions during initial device setup, especially for corporate-owned devices, to reduce manual user interaction and expedite deployment."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."

"I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."

"GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."

"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."

"We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Photography Company

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GFI LanGuard?

I have not encountered the pricing aspect since I am from the technical side; only the sales team handles the pricing part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?

My experience with GFI LanGuard involves patch management where, whenever we visit customers, they request patches for both third-party applications and OS systems. When it is on-premise, we can pr...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Scalefusion?

One area for improvement could be streamlining permissions during initial device setup, especially for corporate-owned devices, to reduce manual user interaction and expedite deployment.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Scalefusion?

Our typical use cases for the product involve auto-enrollment, zero-touch deployment, location tracking, application deployment, auto-installation, and content deployment across various device type...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Scalefusion?

In terms of device management, the platform is particularly effective for managing Android devices, especially Samsung, which are predominant among our customers. Its enhanced support for iOS and W...

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 15% of the time

NinjaOne vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 15% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 13% of the time

More GFI LanGuard Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Scalefusion

Compared 20% of the time

JumpCloud vs Scalefusion

Compared 16% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Scalefusion

Compared 11% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Scalefusion

Compared 10% of the time

NinjaOne vs Scalefusion

Compared 9% of the time

More Scalefusion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard

December 2025

Download GFI LanGuard product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Device Management (MDM)

December 2025

Download Scalefusion product report

Also Known As

LanGuard

No data available

Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

GFI

Scalefusion is a leading Mobile Device & Endpoint Management software helping businesses globally to secure and manage their device fleet.

Ambitious companies around the world trust Scalefusion MDM to secure and manage endpoints including smartphones, tablets, laptops, rugged devices, POS, and digital signages. Our mission is to make Device Management simple and effortless along with providing world-class customer support.

Scalefusion

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross

Magna, Scania, Darya - Varia, Radisson Blu, Slice, Veezu

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard vs. Scalefusion

December 2025

Free Report: GFI LanGuard vs. Scalefusion

Find out what your peers are saying about GFI LanGuard vs. Scalefusion and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GFI LanGuard vs. Scalefusion report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.