GFI LanGuard vs NinjaOne comparison

Read 18 NinjaOne reviews

2,794 Views
1,529 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

GFI LanGuard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

GFI LanGuard and NinjaOne compete in network and endpoint security management. NinjaOne is perceived as superior in feature offerings and overall value despite higher pricing.

Features: GFI LanGuard offers network vulnerability scanning, patch management, and compliance reporting. NinjaOne provides extensive remote monitoring and management capabilities, automated patching, and unified endpoint management.

Room for Improvement: GFI LanGuard needs better reporting capabilities, user training enhancements, and updated user manuals. NinjaOne requires more advanced automation features, better integration options, and enhanced mobile functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GFI LanGuard users find deployment straightforward but time-consuming, with high customer service ratings. NinjaOne is praised for quick deployment and exceptional customer service.

Pricing and ROI: GFI LanGuard users favor its competitive pricing and good ROI. NinjaOne's higher cost is justified by its feature-rich environment, leading to higher ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. NinjaOne Report (Updated: April 2025).

GFI LanGuard vs. NinjaOne

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard

Ranking in Patch Management

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NinjaOne

Ranking in Patch Management

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (30th), Server Monitoring (11th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (6th), Remote Access (20th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (5th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (10th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), MSP Backup (4th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 3.0%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NinjaOne is 8.1%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Ted Mbugua

Security Manager at CRAG

Improves network visibility and keeps our products up to date with the latest patches

This is a solution that I recommend. In fact, those without it are at a disadvantage when it comes to managing their network. The biggest lesson that I have learned is in terms of visibility. GFI LanGuard has given me a wakeup call in terms of what is happening on endpoint machines. However, it is more than just having visibility. It is about having control in terms of what you want to block and what you're able to block. It keeps our network stable in that there are no running applications that you don't even know you have. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Jörg Köhler

Owner at AvalisNT AG

Enhances remote access and integration with third-party tools

I use NinjaOne for managing smaller clients, specifically their devices and software, for small to medium businesses. I provide remote management services through NinjaOne. It allows clients to use NinjaOne for remote access to their computers for home office purposes. This feature is highly…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that the solution can block users from unnecessarily putting devices on the network."

"It is helpful to patch and scan vulnerabilities."

"The solution is easy to use and integrates well with other operating systems."

"The most valuable feature is that I am able to patch third-party solutions."

"The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature."

"The most valuable features in GFI LanGuard are patch management and vulnerability assessment."

"The most useful features of GFI LanGuard are vulnerability assessment and patching solutions."

"The initial setup was easy."

More GFI LanGuard pros

"A significant feature of NinjaOne is its remote access capability, which is essential for my clients’ home office usage."

"The most important aspect of this tool is the security it provides our company."

"NinjaOne is a great product. It is working and it is always developing."

"The customer support at NinjaOne is excellent, rated ten out of ten."

"We can use it for remote monitoring, and it also works great as a troubleshooting tool. We are able to open up a command line or a PowerShell session remotely without having to disrupt the user. They have a limited network device monitoring capability, but for workstation servers, we have the event logs. We can do performance monitoring, system changes, software deployment, and patch management. We can also push scripts. It has a very simple web interface. There are no additional things to do there. Security is also pretty good. It does the same things that the other competitor's tools do. One of the advantages of Ninja is that they have a more capable mobile app, which allows you to see the alerts immediately. I get alerted to major critical issues."

"The policies are probably the most valuable features. They're similar in function to Microsoft group policies where we can have it monitor certain things or push out software on a schedule. I would rate the policies eight out of 10. They're robust, I could monitor most of the things that Windows Performance Monitoring keeps tabs on."

"The most relevant feature is the monitoring, which provides built-in tools for sending commands."

"NinjaOne has a feature where we can create custom scripts that we can run on devices remotely."

More NinjaOne pros

Cons

"When you want to uninstall software from an endpoint, sometimes it becomes very problematic."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding asset tracking."

"The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."

"GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines."

"The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes."

"This solution is limited to the local area network only and cannot manage remote devices."

"GFI LanGuard could improve the rollback feature. If we have installed the wrong we have had some issues with the rollback function. Additionally, more input from GFI LanGuard for the custom software push install."

"If GFI LanGuard had a cloud version it would be better for people that are working from home."

More GFI LanGuard cons

"Lacks sufficient integrations with other PSAs."

"Improvements could be made to reduce NinjaOne's functionalities to focus more on inventory or remote help tools."

"I would like to see more scripts for PowerShell commands."

"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."

"NinjaOne's pricing and user interface needs improvement."

"NinjaOne's dashboard could be easier to use."

"The network monitoring needs to be improved."

"The NinjaOne distribution server is highly dependent on an active directory."

More NinjaOne cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."

"We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."

"GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."

"GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."

"I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."

"Its pricing is great."

"I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."

"We currently pay $1.20 per device on a monthly basis."

"We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable."

"It roughly costs $400 a month. It provides a good value because of the number of tools that you get in the solution. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing. There are no additional costs other than the standard licensing fees."

"NinjaOne is a little expensive but is still cheaper than competitors like Acronis or Veeam."

"NinjaOne's price is fine since my workplace is an educational institution, so we get the product at a really good price considering that we do not pay taxes, making the prices very fair and worth the product."

"NinjaRMM uses a subscription model."

More NinjaOne pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Photography Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GFI LanGuard?

The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature.

What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?

The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes. Instead of directly white listing...

What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?

Internally, as a user, I use GFI LanGuard for email and web monitoring.

What do you like most about NinjaOne?

NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?

The price or licensing of NinjaOne is a little bit high.

What needs improvement with NinjaOne?

The network monitoring needs to be improved.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard

Comparisons

Compared 35% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 24% of the time

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 15% of the time

More GFI LanGuard Competitors

N-able N-central vs NinjaOne

Compared 10% of the time

Atera vs NinjaOne

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs NinjaOne

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs NinjaOne

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium XEM vs NinjaOne

Compared 5% of the time

More NinjaOne Competitors

Product Reports

GFI LanGuard

Download GFI LanGuard product report

Download NinjaOne product report

Also Known As

LanGuard

No data available

Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

GFI

NinjaOne automates the hardest parts of IT, delivering visibility, security, and control over all endpoints for more than 20,000 customers.The NinjaOne automated endpoint management platform is proven to increase productivity, reduce security risk, and lower costs for IT teams and managed service providers. The company seamlessly integrates with a wide range of IT and security technologies. NinjaOne is obsessed with customer success and provides free and unlimited onboarding, training, and support. - Learn more here: https://www.ninjaone.com/

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company

GFI LanGuard vs. NinjaOne