GFI LanGuard vs NinjaOne comparison

Read 21 NinjaOne reviews

7,114 Views
2,276 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GFI LanGuard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

GFI LanGuard and NinjaOne compete in network and endpoint security management. NinjaOne is perceived as superior in feature offerings and overall value despite higher pricing.

Features: GFI LanGuard offers network vulnerability scanning, patch management, and compliance reporting. NinjaOne provides extensive remote monitoring and management capabilities, automated patching, and unified endpoint management.

Room for Improvement: GFI LanGuard needs better reporting capabilities, user training enhancements, and updated user manuals. NinjaOne requires more advanced automation features, better integration options, and enhanced mobile functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GFI LanGuard users find deployment straightforward but time-consuming, with high customer service ratings. NinjaOne is praised for quick deployment and exceptional customer service.

Pricing and ROI: GFI LanGuard users favor its competitive pricing and good ROI. NinjaOne's higher cost is justified by its feature-rich environment, leading to higher ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. NinjaOne Report (Updated: December 2025).

GFI LanGuard vs. NinjaOne

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

1.0

GFI LanGuard enhances security, compliance, and ROI by streamlining patch management, identifying vulnerabilities, and providing actionable insights.

Sentiment score

6.0

NinjaOne boosts productivity, saves time and costs, with ROI in six months, enhancing efficiency and quick problem resolution.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

NinjaOne enables significant time savings, reducing my workload by 40% to 50%, primarily due to remote management capabilities.

For more quotes and insights, download the NinjaOne report

Owner at AvalisNT AG

I have seen a return on investment with NinjaOne, specifically with fewer employees and less time spent on troubleshooting.

Courtney Mcclellan

IT Support at Team Trinet

Customer Service

Sentiment score

4.0

GFI LanGuard's customer service is responsive and helpful, though some regions experience inconsistent technical support quality.

Sentiment score

7.3

NinjaOne's customer support is highly rated, with effective documentation minimizing needs; some cite slow response times.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

Customer support from NinjaOne is excellent.

Joseph Pearson

Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials

The customer support at NinjaOne is excellent, rated ten out of ten.

Owner at AvalisNT AG

Our experience with escalation supports, including auto escalation to third-level or engineering support, has been very positive.

For more quotes and insights, download the NinjaOne report

Cloud Consultant at i-Community AG

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.7

GFI LanGuard offers scalable flexibility for diverse setups, integrating seamlessly and effectively supporting environments up to 400 users.

Sentiment score

8.1

NinjaOne offers robust scalability, supporting diverse user needs and organizational growth while being praised for its adaptability.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

We easily install the agent on new servers and can create scripts to automate agent installation.

Afshaar Ahmed

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

I would rate the scalability of NinjaOne as ten out of ten.

Roy Levy

CEO AND CTO at DeserveIT

The scalability of NinjaOne is good; we can add more as we grow.

Courtney Mcclellan

IT Support at Team Trinet

For more quotes and insights, download the NinjaOne report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.3

GFI LanGuard is stable and insightful, though remote client challenges on MPLS networks can arise but are manageable.

Sentiment score

8.0

Users regard NinjaOne as highly stable, appreciating consistent updates despite occasional minor issues following updates.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

For more quotes and insights, download the NinjaOne report

Owner at AvalisNT AG

In the two years I have used it, I have never experienced any downtime or reliability issues.

Afshaar Ahmed

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Room For Improvement

GFI LanGuard needs improved network management, better Linux documentation, remote work support, cloud options, and enhanced third-party integrations.

Users seek improved antivirus integrations, mobile control, intuitive interface, flexible reporting, customization, and better platform support in NinjaOne.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

Security and reporting, including business intelligence tools, are adequate.

For more quotes and insights, download the NinjaOne report

Cloud Consultant at i-Community AG

The ability to not have a NinjaOne agent or multiple NinjaOne agents on a singular device is a big pain point for the device.

Joseph Pearson

Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials

NinjaOne should consider adding notifications about script executions to email, Teams, or Slack channels.

Afshaar Ahmed

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find GFI LanGuard pricing competitive, with annual costs between $1,000-$2,500 and initial licenses at $21,000.

NinjaOne offers affordable, subscription-based pricing with potential discounts, appealing to enterprises and educational institutions with tax exemptions.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

The pricing for NinjaOne is appropriate for small companies.

Cloud Consultant at i-Community AG

NinjaOne is reasonably priced, particularly with the inclusion of TeamViewer, SentinelOne, and Bitdefender.

For more quotes and insights, download the NinjaOne report

Owner at AvalisNT AG

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for NinjaOne is fairly cheap and easy.

Courtney Mcclellan

IT Support at Team Trinet

Valuable Features

GFI LanGuard provides comprehensive vulnerability assessment, patch management, and reporting, with user-friendly interface and resource efficiency, improving network security.

NinjaOne offers remote monitoring, automation, and integration with features like remote access and an efficient mobile app for management.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GFI LanGuard report

The software's automation tools have solved critical deployment problems for small businesses.

Cloud Consultant at i-Community AG

Every month, every quarter, I see new features, and it is always evolving.

Roy Levy

CEO AND CTO at DeserveIT

A significant feature of NinjaOne is its remote access capability, which is essential for my clients’ home office usage.

For more quotes and insights, download the NinjaOne report

Owner at AvalisNT AG

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard

Ranking in Patch Management

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NinjaOne

Ranking in Patch Management

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (24th), Server Monitoring (6th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (8th), Remote Access (14th), Vulnerability Management (26th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (5th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (9th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), MSP Backup (2nd), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 2.4%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NinjaOne is 7.7%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NinjaOne	7.7%
GFI LanGuard	2.4%
Other	89.9%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Thanu Kishore

Technical Executive at Satcom Infotech

Effective patch management boosts network security and enhances compliance reporting

The product is currently on-premise, and I think the cloud option is still yet to come. If a customer has their own cloud, we can host it there, but the SaaS model is not available, and most companies are requesting the SaaS model for patch management. GFI LanGuard is a good competitor in the market and is popular in my region. We get many leads and numerous requirements for patch management, but most companies ask for the SaaS model, which creates challenges. Third-party app integration needs to be increased in GFI LanGuard. It shouldn't be limited to 30 or 40 applications because there are many applications being used. Instead of manually patching everything, if those patches are included in the product, it would be easier for automatic patching.

Read full review

Joseph Pearson

Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials

Has simplified remote software delivery and script management but needs improved reporting flexibility and better Mac support

NinjaOne's best features include ease of use regarding enablement and deployment, a broad selection and ability of software enablement, and API deliveries. Using CrowdStrike, we are able to tie in NinjaOne's API to have these automatically deliver to endpoints upon addition of those devices to a group with that policy deployed to it. NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance. This easier delivery with NinjaOne gives us oversight on devices without having to be on the call or remoted in directly to a device.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Photography Company

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GFI LanGuard?

I have not encountered the pricing aspect since I am from the technical side; only the sales team handles the pricing part.

What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?

What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?

My experience with GFI LanGuard involves patch management where, whenever we visit customers, they request patches for both third-party applications and OS systems. When it is on-premise, we can pr...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for NinjaOne is fairly cheap and easy.

What needs improvement with NinjaOne?

One challenge I face with NinjaOne is that when remoting in, sometimes the end user has a resolution with very tiny text, making it necessary to zoom in to see what the other computer is displaying...

What is your primary use case for NinjaOne?

My main use case for NinjaOne is ticketing. I use NinjaOne for ticketing in my daily work to keep track of all the computers and their uptime, and to generate tickets if there are any alerts.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 15% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 13% of the time

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 9% of the time

More GFI LanGuard Competitors

Kaseya VSA vs NinjaOne

Compared 8% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs NinjaOne

Compared 7% of the time

N-able N-central vs NinjaOne

Compared 5% of the time

Tanium vs NinjaOne

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs NinjaOne

Compared 5% of the time

More NinjaOne Competitors

Product Reports

GFI LanGuard

Download GFI LanGuard product report

Download NinjaOne product report

Also Known As

LanGuard

No data available

Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

GFI

NinjaOne provides comprehensive remote monitoring, troubleshooting, and automation via a user-friendly web interface. With a robust mobile app and integration capabilities, it appeals to small businesses seeking cost-effective management solutions.

NinjaOne is designed to streamline IT operations through its remote monitoring, patch management, and automation capabilities. Its integration with Bitdefender and ongoing feature enhancements are valuable, although users express a desire for more third-party compatibility and smoother deployment processes. The platform's SLA system enhances performance tracking, while its continual development is a key attraction. Despite some calls for a more intuitive graphical interface and advanced reporting features, it remains an asset for managed service providers and businesses adapting to cloud-based environments.

What are the most important features?

Remote Monitoring: Essential for real-time insights into network and device performance.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks, increasing efficiency in IT management.
Patch Management: Timely updates for software and system security.
Mobile App: Ensures alerts and management capabilities on the go.
Third-Party Integrations: Enhances functionality by working with tools like Bitdefender.

What benefits can users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Appeals to small companies seeking budget-friendly IT solutions.
Performance Tracking: Improved SLA system aids in efficient performance monitoring.
Enhanced Management: Effective use of scripts and policies streamline operations.
Client Interaction: Better remote session management and asset control.

NinjaOne is widely employed across different sectors for server and workstation management, network infrastructure oversight, and client computer support. With its cloud-based framework, it supports managed service providers and businesses shifting to the cloud, ensuring seamless software deployment and improved asset management, making it integral to modern IT environments.

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company

GFI LanGuard vs. NinjaOne