GFI LanGuard vs NinjaOne comparison

Read 18 NinjaOne reviews

6,652 Views
2,661 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

GFI LanGuard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

GFI LanGuard and NinjaOne compete in network and endpoint security management. NinjaOne is perceived as superior in feature offerings and overall value despite higher pricing.

Features: GFI LanGuard offers network vulnerability scanning, patch management, and compliance reporting. NinjaOne provides extensive remote monitoring and management capabilities, automated patching, and unified endpoint management.

Room for Improvement: GFI LanGuard needs better reporting capabilities, user training enhancements, and updated user manuals. NinjaOne requires more advanced automation features, better integration options, and enhanced mobile functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GFI LanGuard users find deployment straightforward but time-consuming, with high customer service ratings. NinjaOne is praised for quick deployment and exceptional customer service.

Pricing and ROI: GFI LanGuard users favor its competitive pricing and good ROI. NinjaOne's higher cost is justified by its feature-rich environment, leading to higher ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed GFI LanGuard vs. NinjaOne Report (Updated: June 2025).

GFI LanGuard vs. NinjaOne

Download the complete report

Helped 860,825 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard

Ranking in Patch Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NinjaOne

Ranking in Patch Management

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (32nd), Server Monitoring (8th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (8th), Remote Access (20th), Vulnerability Management (26th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (6th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (11th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (2nd), MSP Backup (3rd), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 2.4%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NinjaOne is 9.5%, up from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Ted Mbugua

Security Manager at CRAG

Highly stable, quick support, and useful modules

My advice to others wanting to implement this solution is you do not have to be very technical to use it. When installing it, you only need to click next. Additionally, the support is helpful and knowledgeable. Their technical documentation is easily accessible. I rate GFI LanGuard an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Jörg Köhler

Owner at AvalisNT AG

Enhances remote access and integration with third-party tools

I use NinjaOne for managing smaller clients, specifically their devices and software, for small to medium businesses. I provide remote management services through NinjaOne. It allows clients to use NinjaOne for remote access to their computers for home office purposes. This feature is highly…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others."

"I like that the solution can block users from unnecessarily putting devices on the network."

"The initial setup was easy."

"The solution is easy to use and integrates well with other operating systems."

"The most valuable features in GFI LanGuard are patch management and vulnerability assessment."

"The most valuable feature is that I am able to patch third-party solutions."

"It is helpful to patch and scan vulnerabilities."

"The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature."

More GFI LanGuard pros

"NinjaOne has a feature where we can create custom scripts that we can run on devices remotely."

"The most relevant feature is the monitoring, which provides built-in tools for sending commands."

"The most important aspect of this tool is the security it provides our company."

"A significant feature of NinjaOne is its remote access capability, which is essential for my clients’ home office usage."

"It helps us to be able to have visibility into the overall performance of the servers, laptops, and desktops that we are managing currently."

"NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked."

"The installation is easy, it only took two minutes."

"The policies are probably the most valuable features. They're similar in function to Microsoft group policies where we can have it monitor certain things or push out software on a schedule. I would rate the policies eight out of 10. They're robust, I could monitor most of the things that Windows Performance Monitoring keeps tabs on."

More NinjaOne pros

Cons

"GFI LanGuard could improve the rollback feature. If we have installed the wrong we have had some issues with the rollback function. Additionally, more input from GFI LanGuard for the custom software push install."

"When you want to uninstall software from an endpoint, sometimes it becomes very problematic."

"This solution is limited to the local area network only and cannot manage remote devices."

"If GFI LanGuard had a cloud version it would be better for people that are working from home."

"The version we are using only allows one person to use it at a time and does not allow multi-users."

"The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding asset tracking."

"GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines."

More GFI LanGuard cons

"The network monitoring needs to be improved."

"I would like to see more scripts for PowerShell commands."

"NinjaOne's reporting module is cumbersome."

"The NinjaOne distribution server is highly dependent on an active directory."

"There was a lot of delay with NinjaOne's ticketing system. For example, when a user creates a ticket and raises an issue, it would take 30 to 40 minutes to appear on the IT side. So the time delay issue is the main point."

"The reporting is lackluster. NinjaOne is great for maintaining systems, but it's hard to use it to understand the state that systems are in without going in and mining the information myself. I rate the reporting two out of 10."

"The remote connectivity could be better. It works most of the time, but sometimes, there are issues."

"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."

More NinjaOne cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."

"I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."

"GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."

"GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."

"We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."

"The product's pricing depends on the number of PCs or devices."

"We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable."

"NinjaRMM uses a subscription model."

"We currently pay $1.20 per device on a monthly basis."

"It roughly costs $400 a month. It provides a good value because of the number of tools that you get in the solution. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing. There are no additional costs other than the standard licensing fees."

"NinjaOne is a little expensive but is still cheaper than competitors like Acronis or Veeam."

"NinjaOne's price is fine since my workplace is an educational institution, so we get the product at a really good price considering that we do not pay taxes, making the prices very fair and worth the product."

"I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."

More NinjaOne pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,825 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Photography Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GFI LanGuard?

The most valuable feature of GFI LanGuard is its email spam feature.

What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?

The only drawback with GFI LanGuard is that you cannot directly integrate it from the Outlook email; instead, you have to first log in to the site to make changes. Instead of directly white listing...

What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?

Internally, as a user, I use GFI LanGuard for email and web monitoring.

What do you like most about NinjaOne?

NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?

The price or licensing of NinjaOne is a little bit high.

What needs improvement with NinjaOne?

The network monitoring needs to be improved.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard

Comparisons

Compared 39% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 25% of the time

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 13% of the time

More GFI LanGuard Competitors

Kaseya VSA vs NinjaOne

Compared 10% of the time

N-able N-central vs NinjaOne

Compared 8% of the time

Atera vs NinjaOne

Compared 7% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs NinjaOne

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs NinjaOne

Compared 6% of the time

More NinjaOne Competitors

Product Reports

GFI LanGuard

Download GFI LanGuard product report

Download NinjaOne product report

Also Known As

LanGuard

No data available

Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

GFI

NinjaOne automates the hardest parts of IT, delivering visibility, security, and control over all endpoints for more than 20,000 customers.The NinjaOne automated endpoint management platform is proven to increase productivity, reduce security risk, and lower costs for IT teams and managed service providers. The company seamlessly integrates with a wide range of IT and security technologies. NinjaOne is obsessed with customer success and provides free and unlimited onboarding, training, and support. - Learn more here: https://www.ninjaone.com/

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company

GFI LanGuard vs. NinjaOne