ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and GFI LanGuard are two prominent patch management tools. Based on user reviews, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus holds an advantage in support and satisfaction, whereas GFI LanGuard is often preferred for its superior feature set, with users finding its cost justified.
Features: ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is praised for comprehensive patch management, automated updates, and ease of use. Users value its integration capabilities. GFI LanGuard is appreciated for offering detailed vulnerability assessments, robust security features, and extensive network-wide auditing. Users feel GFI LanGuard's features give it a competitive edge despite the higher price.
Room for Improvement: Reviewers suggest ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus could enhance its reporting tools and simplify navigation. For GFI LanGuard, users indicate a need for performance improvements and better customer support response times. Each tool has identified areas that require enhancements but differ in specific user demands.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Users find ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus straightforward to deploy with reliable customer service. Conversely, GFI LanGuard's deployment process is noted as more time-consuming, and its customer service receives mixed reviews. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus leads in deployment simplicity and support quality.
Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is appreciated for its competitive pricing and good ROI, which appeals to budget-sensitive users. GFI LanGuard, though more expensive, is seen as delivering a high ROI due to its expansive features. User reviews indicate that while GFI LanGuard is costlier, the investment is deemed worthwhile based on performance gains.
Compared to other products, ManageEngine provides good return on investment within five years.
Customer service and support are excellent, with a perfect score of ten out of ten.
The technical support from ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is helpful.
Scalability requires downtime for performance adjustments.
The solution is very stable.
When the patch testing works well, there is no need for patch management rollbacks.
Instead of separate technician licenses for each product, there should be a single bundled license to simplify licensing requirements.
There is a concern regarding the exchange rate as one dollar equals six reais today, making everything expensive in dollars for us.
ManageEngine's licensing model recently changed from being endpoint-based to server-based, which might affect costs during the next renewal.
The software covers platform security and application security, ensuring everything is updated at the endpoint level.
The vulnerability scanning highlights outdated PCs and users breaching policies.
It is valued for its role in addressing the vulnerabilities discovered by Insight VM.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus | 6.8% |
| GFI LanGuard | 2.2% |
| Other | 91.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.
Patch Manager Plus is a simple patch management tool that makes it easy to keep your network patched and secure. It is an endpoint patch management software that provides enterprises a single interface for automating all patch management tasks - from detecting missing patches to deploying patches - for Windows, Mac, Linux and 250+ third-party applications. Whether you have one computer or hundred, they can all be patched at the same time from a single point of console.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
