Gemalto Protiva [EOL] vs Symantec Advanced Authentication comparison

Thales and Broadcom are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Additionally, 100% of Thales users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Gemalto Protiva [EOL]

Read 2 Gemalto Protiva [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Advanced Authentic...

Read 9 Symantec Advanced Authentication reviews

695 Views
681 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Gemalto Protiva [EOL]

Symantec Advanced Authentic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2025

Gemalto Protiva EOL and Symantec Advanced Authentication are competing products in the authentication solutions market. Symantec Advanced Authentication appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and flexibility, making it worth its cost.

Features: Gemalto Protiva EOL includes basic authentication, straightforward integration, and simple management, providing essential security solutions for small-scale needs. Symantec Advanced Authentication offers multifactor authentication, adaptive risk scoring, and cloud support, providing advanced security measures suitable for varying business environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Gemalto Protiva EOL has a straightforward deployment model with basic customer service, which can be beneficial for smaller operations with limited scalability. Symantec Advanced Authentication features a flexible deployment approach and robust customer support, making it adaptable to diverse requirements and ensuring better service.

Pricing and ROI: Gemalto Protiva EOL offers a lower initial setup cost, making it attractive for businesses with budget constraints, though its value may diminish due to limited scalability. Symantec Advanced Authentication, while more expensive upfront, delivers a significant return on investment thanks to its extensive feature set and adaptability, benefiting long-term financial planning.

To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gemalto Protiva [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Advanced Authentic...

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (24th)

Featured Reviews

Paul Connaire

RAS Team Lead at Produban USA

A cost-effective solution, but the user interface lacks the ability to customize

In the UK, I think that we are one of the biggest utilizers of the service. With the restrictions that it has, I don't think it's got massive upscalability. For general users it is fine, but the scalability could be better. We started with approximately eight and a half thousand users, and we currently have about twelve-thousand people using it. This is used widely across a number of user groups, including administrators, end users, general users, and specific privileged users for two-factor authentication. We do plan to increase the usage of this solution. Our current capacity is fourteen thousand but we will probably grow beyond that.

Read full review

Umair (Abu Mohaymin) Akhlaque

Group CEO at Flexsolutions

Ensures robust security features and ease of deployment, although it may lack some of the more modern authentication options

There has been a need for aggressive development to modernize the product and align it with contemporary security requirements. While the rebranding has been a step forward, further enhancements are essential to meet the evolving demands of the market. It lacks features such as ActiveSync Exchange security, and it doesn't offer alternatives like password-less authentication via biometrics or patches. While Symantec mainly relies on traditional token-based or password-based methods, newer authentication methods are missing from its repertoire. Support services often lack promptness and depth of knowledge, leaving customers waiting for weeks to resolve issues. In the realm of multifactor authentication, swift resolution of problems is critical, as any slowdown or interruption can significantly impact operations. Urgent improvement is necessary to ensure that support responses are faster and more effective, aligning with the demands of MFA implementation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature for us is the ability to use Active Directory groups as virtual containers instead of domains because it means that we can control our access groups better."

"It tells us exactly what we want in terms of authentication to various applications and provides protection for users who access them."

"One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability."

"Rules on Risk Authentication are very good."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it's a strong authentication solution that's able to integrate with applications."

Cons

"The user interface needs improvement."

"Urgent improvement is necessary to ensure that support responses are faster and more effective, aligning with the demands of MFA implementation."

"This solution could be improved with risk-based authentication. I think that this product has everything that most customers are looking for, but modern technology has people looking for security tools with risk-based authentication, which they have a separate tool for. If they could integrate this, it would improve Symantec Advanced Authentication. They have to look at what's newly trending and how things are moving forward, and then adapt and adopt those features. Symantec's technical support should also be improved, in terms of response time."

"We have seen quite a few issues with bugginess. It is indeed pretty buggy and we have had to install some fixes."

"Advanced Authentication talks about the Device ID. But how the device ID is captured, I want to know more about that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a cost-effective solution compared to some other products out there."

"There are eventually going to be implementation costs. Sometimes you're required to have custom code developments there, so that has to be part of the implementation price."

"The price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Symantec Advanced Authentication?

One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Advanced Authentication?

The price is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Advanced Authentication?

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Identity Governance vs Gemalto Protiva [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More Gemalto Protiva [EOL] Competitors

RSA Adaptive Authentication vs Symantec Advanced Authentication

Compared 18% of the time

Thales Authenticators vs Symantec Advanced Authentication

Compared 15% of the time

CyberArk Certificate Manager vs Symantec Advanced Authentication

Compared 15% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Symantec Advanced Authentication

Compared 14% of the time

RSA Authentication Manager vs Symantec Advanced Authentication

Compared 13% of the time

More Symantec Advanced Authentication Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

January 2026

Download Gemalto Protiva [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Advanced Authentication

January 2026

Download Symantec Advanced Authentication product report

Also Known As

Protiva

CA Advanced Authentication, CA Strong Authentication, CA Risk Authentication, Arcot WebFort, Arcot RiskFort

Overview

Gemalto Protiva [EOL] offered strong identity and access management solutions tailored to enhance enterprise security. It provided authentication and digital protection critical for businesses relying on precise access to sensitive information.

Gemalto Protiva [EOL] was acclaimed for its robust security features, facilitating authentication processes and protecting digital assets from unauthorized access. Designed to cater to businesses seeking heightened security measures, it delivered multifactor authentication options and seamless integration with existing systems. Its use spanned across secure login and transaction services, ensuring that user data remained protected against breaches.

What were the key features offered by Gemalto Protiva [EOL]?

Multifactor Authentication: Provided layers of security for user validation.
Seamless Integration: Easily connected with existing IT infrastructures.
Versatile Deployment: Supported both on-premise and cloud environments.
Enhanced Security Tokens: Utilized smart cards and USB tokens for credential security.
Comprehensive Access Control: Centrally managed user access to sensitive information.

What benefits or ROI should you consider in reviewing Gemalto Protiva [EOL]?

Increased Security: Strengthens defenses against unauthorized data access.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces potential financial loss from data breaches.
Regulatory Compliance: Aids adherence to industry security standards.
User Productivity: Simplifies login processes, saving time and resources.

In healthcare, Gemalto Protiva [EOL] protected patient data and ensured compliance with health regulations. In finance, it secured transactions and user accounts, while in education, it safeguarded academic records and research data, highlighting its versatility across distinct sectors.

Thales

CA Advanced Authentication provides a secure, user-convenient and cost-effective way to protect online and mobile applications. The solution consists of two components: CA Risk Authentication allows the enterprise to silently and transparently collect data and assess risk based on device identification, location and user behavior, among other factors, and CA Strong Authentication provides a wide variety of software-based, two-factor authentication credentials and technology to make passwords more secure. Together they enable an intelligent, layered security approach to protect user identities and organizational data.

Take the assessment

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Exostar, Sunrise Health Region, Baker Tilly, Seattle Children's, SEW-Eurodrive

Global bank, Large Filipino Bank and SK Infosec

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.