Fusion Framework vs IBM OpenPages comparison

Fusion Risk Management and IBM are both solutions in the GRC category. Fusion Risk Management is ranked #34, while IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Fusion Risk Management holds a 0.9% mindshare in G, compared to IBM’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution.

Fusion Framework

373 Views
287 Comparison Views

IBM OpenPages

Read 9 IBM OpenPages reviews

1,421 Views
1,322 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Fusion Framework

IBM OpenPages

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fusion Framework and IBM OpenPages based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, Diligent and others in GRC.

To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GRC

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fusion Framework

Ranking in GRC

34th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (25th)

IBM OpenPages

Ranking in GRC

6th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Governance (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the GRC category, the mindshare of Fusion Framework is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM OpenPages is 3.6%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM OpenPages	3.6%
Fusion Framework	0.9%
Other	95.5%

GRC

Featured Reviews

Use Fusion Framework?

Leave a review

Gabriele Meneguzzi

GRC Practice Leader at Stratos Analytics

Have improved operational control and simplified internal workflows through a clear user interface

The most useful features in IBM OpenPages are the workflow features and front-end. The workflow feature in IBM OpenPages is very flexible, easy to configure, and can help design every kind of process, while the front-end is very useful, clear, simple, and dynamic. The benefit of a centralized platform in risk management, such as IBM OpenPages, is that it allows sharing information and guarantees a central framework of risk and control. The dashboards in IBM OpenPages help with monitoring processes for different users and profiles, and we use the dashboard extensively to show the state of different processes to control them. IBM OpenPages integrates effectively with other tools and existing infrastructure for my customers as we integrate other tools, using APIs to match different information, though some other tools may better support integration. IBM offers Connect, an add-on for integration, but we do not use it, relying solely on API. The reporting tools in IBM OpenPages have very strong potential because they are linked with Cognos IBM, a business intelligence tool, allowing for very good and complex reports, though creating these reports requires skills in business intelligence to get the most out of IBM OpenPages.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Insurance Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about IBM OpenPages?

The product’s interface is very intuitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM OpenPages?

There is nothing in particular that needs improvement in IBM OpenPages, although reporting could be improved to make it easier to create reports.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM OpenPages?

My customers' main use cases for IBM OpenPages include ICT risk, operational risk management, and regulatory and compliance management.

See all answers

Comparisons

RSA Archer vs Fusion Framework

Compared 61% of the time

ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management vs Fusion Framework

Compared 39% of the time

More Fusion Framework Competitors

RSA Archer vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 35% of the time

MetricStream vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 24% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 11% of the time

SAS Enterprise GRC vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 6% of the time

AuditBoard vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM OpenPages Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GRC

November 2025

Download Fusion Framework product report

Buyer's Guide

GRC

November 2025

Download IBM OpenPages product report

Also Known As

No data available

OpenPages

Overview

Fusion Framework is a comprehensive tool designed to streamline risk management and business continuity planning for organizations. It integrates key features that support decision-making, enhance resilience, and optimize outcomes.

Fusion Framework caters to organizations looking to strengthen their risk management and business continuity strategies. It offers real-time risk assessments, enabling users to respond promptly to incidents. With analytics and reporting capabilities, it provides valuable insights for strategic planning. Users can customize workflows to align with their operational needs, fostering efficiency and control across processes.

What are the core features of Fusion Framework?

Risk Assessment: Delivers real-time, data-driven risk analysis to minimize impacts.
Incident Management: Helps track and resolve incidents swiftly to minimize disruption.
Customizable Workflows: Allows personalization to suit specific operational methods.
Analytics and Reporting: Offers in-depth insights for informed decision-making.
Scalable Integration: Easily integrates with existing systems for improved workflow.

What benefits should organizations expect in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines processes through automation and customization.
Enhanced Resilience: Strengthens business continuity with robust risk management.
Cost Effectiveness: Reduces expenses associated with downtime and risks.
Improved Decision-Making: Provides precise data analysis for strategic advantages.
Scalability: Adapts to organizational growth and changing demands.

Industries such as healthcare, finance, and logistics utilize Fusion Framework to enhance operational resilience and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. Its flexibility allows it to be tailored to specific sector challenges, making it a versatile choice for enhancing continuity and risk management strategies.

Fusion Risk Management

Enables customers to manage risk and compliance initiatives across the enterprise, helping businesses to reduce loss, improve decision-making about resource allocation, and optimize business performance.

IBM

Sample Customers

Aureon, ETS, Discount Tire, Box,

Nationwide, Process Innovation AG, OSRAM Licht AG, Dep‹sito Central de Valores (DCV), Delta Lloyd Group, Unum

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, Diligent and others in GRC. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.