We performed a comparison between IBM OpenPages and OneTrust GRC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The content, reporting, and workflow features stand out as the most valuable aspects."
"The product’s interface is very intuitive."
"The ability to keep a record of internal incidents in the company, and also the monitoring of Key Indicators."
"OneTrust GRC is stable."
"The product helps us streamline audit and incident management processes."
"We receive notifications or cases and prioritize them accordingly, which helps us address issues promptly."
"Vendors can be assessed and rated out of the tool, and assessments can be scheduled for updates at certain intervals."
"It does help in the automation of our privacy impact assessments."
"One of the valuable features of this solution is it has the ability to review fourth and fifth parties to the nth degree."
"As a solution for IT risks, it is a very good product."
"IBM OpenPages needs improvement in its UI. Currently, it is difficult to see the relationships (associations/parents) between all items unless you click on the item itself."
"The solution must allow customization in reporting."
"I believe there's room for improvement in establishing connections with external information."
"They could improve by offering free help. A solution, a lot of times, is not just the use of the solution. For example, it is the overall engagement, how well do they support the system, what is their SLA, and how long their response time is to an issue. It would be beneficial if they had some type of professional services where they offer the first five hours of professional services a year for free. That would be a substantial benefit rather than having to buy professional services or professional services packages."
"There are limitations to customized workflow automation, and they need to increase both the available automation and the customized workflow."
"I haven't seen any return on investment using the solution. If I had the opportunity, I would use a different solution."
"We encounter difficulties creating multiple platforms or interfaces and manual processes for changing certain settings."
"OneTrust GRC's workflows aren't automated and need to be manually driven."
"The Vendor Risk dashboard is quite basic today and not interactive, but improvements are in coming the next releases."
"The product is not that easy to set up."
IBM OpenPages is ranked 8th in GRC with 5 reviews while OneTrust GRC is ranked 5th in GRC with 7 reviews. IBM OpenPages is rated 6.6, while OneTrust GRC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM OpenPages writes "Enables us to manage global workflow and users' relationships with the links". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneTrust GRC writes "Costly solution that may not guarantee ROI, but remains effective in IT risk management ". IBM OpenPages is most compared with RSA Archer, MetricStream, SAP BusinessObjects GRC, AuditBoard and SAS Enterprise GRC, whereas OneTrust GRC is most compared with RSA Archer, ProcessUnity, AuditBoard, Workiva Wdesk and Aravo. See our IBM OpenPages vs. OneTrust GRC report.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
