Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series vs HPE EVA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fujitsu Logo
254 views|219 comparisons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
383 views|317 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series and HPE EVA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series?
VladimirKaploun
Ranking
Views
254
Comparisons
219
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
383
Comparisons
317
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Eternus DX400 series
EVA P6000 series, HP EVA
Learn More
Overview

The Fujitsu Storage ETERNUS DX series aligns storage resources with business priorities, thus enabling higher system utilization and delivering increased system consolidation capabilities and a faster ROI. ETERNUS SF provides enterprise-class functionalities in the entry and midrange class and allows flexible disaster recovery and business continuity concepts for the different model sizes, thus decreasing investment costs.

Lean IT budgets require more efficient ways of managing data. Driving business growth and agility requires simple yet flexible storage that reduces costs while maintaining application availability. With an installed base of over 100,000, mid-sized organizations count on HP EVA Storage. This fifth-generation, virtualized storage array provides availability while increasing productivity and capacity utilization.
Sample Customers
DDOR Novi Sad
Bank Simpanan Nasional, EDF, Saint Mary's University, Thomson Reuters
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company12%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company10%
University10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise56%
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is ranked 11th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while HPE EVA is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is rated 0.0, while HPE EVA is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE EVA writes "There is reliable support for HDD replacement". Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is most compared with HPE StorageWorks MSA and NetApp FAS Series, whereas HPE EVA is most compared with HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE StorageWorks MSA.

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.