No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs HPE EVA [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE EVA [EOL] are both solutions in the Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) category. Additionally, 94% of HPE 3PAR StoreServ users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 60% of HPE EVA [EOL] users who would recommend it.
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews
  • 18,803 Views
  • 5,077 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
HPE EVA [EOL]
Read 4 HPE EVA [EOL] reviews
    60% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 28, 2025

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE EVA compete in enterprise storage solutions. HPE 3PAR StoreServ is favored for its advanced technology and scalability.

    Features: HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers dynamic tiering, thin provisioning, and a robust management console, providing efficiency and agility. HPE EVA is known for simpler architecture and high availability.

    Room for Improvement: HPE 3PAR could improve ease of learning and some interface aspects. Users noted the need for more streamlined migrations. Cost could be lowered further. HPE EVA faced limitations in scalability, was less upgradable, and lacked modern features like advanced tiering.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE 3PAR StoreServ is recognized for its refined deployment process and comprehensive support services. HPE EVA was known for a quicker setup but is discontinued, leading to reduced support availability.

    Pricing and ROI: HPE 3PAR StoreServ's advanced hardware results in a higher initial setup cost but offers better ROI through long-term savings. HPE EVA had lower upfront costs, yet its discontinuation may lead to higher expenses and diminished ROI due to lack of updates and support.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: August 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
    August 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 914,394 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Average Rating
    8.6
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.2
    Number of Reviews
    304
    Ranking in other categories
    NAS (6th), Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (10th)
    HPE EVA [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.6
    Number of Reviews
    4
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Muhammad Saqib - PeerSpot reviewer
    Muhammad Saqib
    System Engineer at Hybrid Tech
    Uninterrupted upgrades accelerate performance with good support
    I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It should be noted that in Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries. We encountered an issue with a customer where the midplane failed and was not available. We had to wait for several days for a replacement, even in a 24/7 support case. Additionally, we faced motherboard failures in the customer's environment, encountering two motherboard failures simultaneously. We obtained one motherboard immediately, yet had to wait ten days for another. These issues should have been resolved promptly given the 24/7 support level.
    Read full review
    reviewer2268315 - PeerSpot reviewer
    reviewer2268315
    Deputy General Manager & Enterprise Head at a security firm with 501-1,000 employees
    Has the ability to automatically deal with faulty disks
    In terms of the most beneficial features of the product, I would say that during the faulty disk replacement process, the tool automatically ungroups the faulty disk, so from the tool itself, anybody can identify which disk is faulty and then repair it. The data replication part is not enabled in the product that I use since the DRP feature is not enabled. I work with the product's high availability feature. Considering the size of the environment where the product is used, the product offers around 80 to 90 TB of storage space. I won't recommend the product to others who plan to use it. The implementation process of the product would be as per the standard of the organization where it is going to be used. Everyone should have their own organizational data structure as per the data orientation needs. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "IOPS, reliability and the value that it adds to our organization are the most valuable features."
    "3PAR is easy to keep running and does not require too much effort. It has been very reliable, which is key."
    "It all works in concert using Recovery Manager Central (RMC). HPE coordinates it all, so it is more of a solution instead of products trying to do things together."
    "The stability of 3PAR is unquestionable."
    "If you design it right and implement it right, it's headache free. Just keep it there and it does what it's suppose to do."
    "I like that 3PAR can remake the disk online. That's one of the best features because when we first started, that was the best. The team provisioning feature was also a good one. Those features are the best for me, provisioning and online optimization, and the tier you can have for storage."
    "3PAR's ease-of-use has really improved our functioning because it requires less administration and less tuning."
    "It helps our core applications run very fast, increasing overall performance by about 60 percent, with one process going from taking seven hours to taking one hour, making it a key for storage in our organization."
    More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros
    "The solution's most valuable feature is storage provisioning, which allows me to easily provision the disk space on the servers."
    "We cannot stop this SAN array; it has never failed since it was started, and we have not had a problem with it at all."
    "​It is very stable."
    "It's fast, reliable, and it's very good for the price."
    "My most important criteria when selecting a vendor are price, dedupe, and compression."
    "​HPE has reliable support for HDD replacement.​"
    "There have been no fail-stop failures for the last five years."
     

    Cons

    "Many points were needed for the initial system on first time setup. We had some non-predictable random issues during initialization like non-probable Inserv serial numbers etc."
    "This is a product that I do not recommend because it is too difficult for people to manage, and it should also be a little bit cheaper."
    "I would like to see NVMe support, not only on the disk side, but also in the NVMe over Fibre Channel."
    "This solution is now at end-of-life."
    "Upgrades on them are a bit tricky. For us to do a head swap on one is a full outer joiner storage frame, which is obviously not that easy to do in a production environment."
    "HPE 3PAR StoreServ is at its end of life and they are forcing us to purchase new hardware. They will no longer support this solution. They should provide support for a longer time. For example, 10 years instead of five years."
    "Customer Service: It varies, sometimes they are a 9/10, and some days they can be 4/10. Technical Support: It varies, sometimes they are a 9/10, and some days they can be 2/10."
    "I give it an eight because of the support, that I can't get support in my country. This is the worst part. Support cannot be sold until we are out of the sanctions."
    More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons
    "In general, my boss feels that HPE's prices are very high."
    "I faced some issues during the disk replacement process in HPE EVA."
    "It could be just this particular model, but the storage is not so stable."
    "Performance could probably be improve with faster controllers, but it is already an old device. We do have performance problems now, but it is a rather old device, so we have what we have."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "The licensing fee is not cheap."
    "I would like it to be cheaper."
    "This licensing fees for this solution are merged with all of our HP annual costs, which in total are a couple hundred thousand dollars."
    "You need to properly assess your needs before buying the solution since there are chances of overpaying. The type of configuration that you choose can make the price go higher or lower."
    "We had to go back and purchase iLO licenses and brocade switches for the flex fabric to have a complete solution."
    "I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. It is expensive."
    "For the price that we were able to acquire it, we have seen it give us the performance and stability that we require to run our enterprise."
    "The main issue with 3PAR right now is its cost problem. Right now, there are some other storage cabinets that can do what 3PAR can do. Now, they can do it as well with a more revised budget."
    More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice
    Information not available
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Comparison Review

    it_user182013 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user182013
    Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
    May 1, 2015
    Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR
    Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…
    Read full review
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Outsourcing Company
    17%
    Construction Company
    11%
    Financial Services Firm
    11%
    Manufacturing Company
    8%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business73
    Midsize Enterprise74
    Large Enterprise170
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?
    HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?
    As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with HPE 3PAR StoreServ?
    I have no specific ideas for improvement at present. We just need to verify whether our current virtual server setup is acceptable to the RBI, as they had raised questions about the VSO, ISO config...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    IBM FlashSystem vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ Logo
    IBM FlashSystem vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Compared 6% of the time
    Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ Logo
    Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Compared 5% of the time
    NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ Logo
    NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Compared 5% of the time
    Everpure FlashArray vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ Logo
    Everpure FlashArray vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Compared 4% of the time
    Dell PowerScale vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ Logo
    Dell PowerScale vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Compared 4% of the time
    More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors
    Dell PowerVault vs HPE EVA [EOL] Logo
    Dell PowerVault vs HPE EVA [EOL]
    Compared 23% of the time
    Dell Connectrix vs HPE EVA [EOL] Logo
    Dell Connectrix vs HPE EVA [EOL]
    Compared 20% of the time
    NetApp FAS Series vs HPE EVA [EOL] Logo
    NetApp FAS Series vs HPE EVA [EOL]
    Compared 18% of the time
    HPE MSA vs HPE EVA [EOL] Logo
    HPE MSA vs HPE EVA [EOL]
    Compared 17% of the time
    More HPE EVA [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    September 2026
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ reportDownload HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
    August 2026
    HPE EVA [EOL] reportDownload HPE EVA [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage
    EVA P6000 series, HP EVA
     

    Overview

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

    What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?
    • Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
    • Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
    • Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
    • Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
    • Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
    • Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.
    What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?
    • Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
    • Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
    • Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
    • Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Lean IT budgets require more efficient ways of managing data. Driving business growth and agility requires simple yet flexible storage that reduces costs while maintaining application availability. With an installed base of over 100,000, mid-sized organizations count on HP EVA Storage. This fifth-generation, virtualized storage array provides availability while increasing productivity and capacity utilization.

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise
     

    Sample Customers

    Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC
    Bank Simpanan Nasional, EDF, Saint Mary's University, Thomson Reuters
    Buyer's Guide
    Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
    August 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: August 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

    We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.