Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fujitsu CX1000 vs Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fujitsu CX1000
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Blade Servers (15th)
Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use Fujitsu CX1000?
Leave a review
it_user477012 - PeerSpot reviewer
Support Engineer-Enterprise System at a tech services company
Easy to deploy and produces better performance with less maintenance
We have separate compute module know as FSM for management Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance. Integrated DVD/CD ROM. Five years. No issues to date. It is every important that you should be very clear with your future plans. We have had no scalability issues to date.…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
 

Also Known As

CX1000
Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TMC GmbH
Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: January 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.