HPE BladeSystem vs Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Lenovo are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Lenovo users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 140 HPE BladeSystem reviews

6,155 Views
6,093 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Read 11 Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] reviews

88% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE BladeSystem and Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers.

To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,351 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

140

Ranking in other categories

Blade Servers (3rd)

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

TarunAudichey

CTO at Miraj

Centralized modular platform has improved data center management and supports mission-critical workloads

The main area for improvement I see is the training process. When you use anything, how easily it is to manage is very important in hyper-converged solutions. If you compare it with VMware, it is very familiar. HPE Converged, however, is very large to understand for a new person. I am talking about training and management perspective, and user management. A system integrator and any system engineer who will operate and manage the system should find it easy to understand any configuration part and understanding part, which is currently a little bit tough. In Virtual Connect, we need some improvement. If we are going to move to hybrid, we need to easily move VM transactions from on-premises to cloud. We require a good, more easy process for day-to-day activities. Performance-wise, HPE BladeSystem is good regarding its ability to support mission-critical applications. However, reliability is all dependent on the core and memories, which will centrally control the entire blade and hyper-converged. We require more reliable things because if something goes down in the controller and center control, it is very tough to manage. We require a centralized image that will be replicated to any other device immediately, and all configurations and everything will come as soon as possible.

Read full review

it_user477012

Support Engineer-Enterprise System at a tech services company

Easy to deploy and produces better performance with less maintenance

We have separate compute module know as FSM for management Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance. Integrated DVD/CD ROM. Five years. No issues to date. It is every important that you should be very clear with your future plans. We have had no scalability issues to date.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The density of the BladeSystem, that we can keep adding blades as we need more VMs."

"HP Proliant servers are rock solid and when you need technical support HP’s team is there to support you with answers, no matter how long it takes to properly identify the root cause and then propose a solution."

"Technical support is good to excellent; it is a solid product with a lot of years behind it and a BIG install base."

"We were using Cisco UCS and we recently made the change to HP BladeSystem because the Cisco UCS platform was more complex to run, and with my experience HP was really easy to set up, manage, and maintain."

"It is a good solution, reliable, stable; try it and you will see."

"It has provided us with a platform on which we have been able to create innovative solutions for our customers at very reasonable prices."

"Probably the most value there is the compactness and the density you can get into the data center."

"Currently, we're using HPE BladeSystem BL460, but we're planning to migrate to the Synergy System as part of our strategy since the OEM support for the BL460 will eventually end. The most valuable features are its high computing capability and availability. Additionally, the ability to manage all resources from a single dashboard using the OneView solution that comes with the HP Converge system is incredibly beneficial. The efficientand unique environment makes it an excellent fit for our needs."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance."

"Before this solution, we used rack mount servers, but this solution saves physical spaces and increases reliability."

"The form factor is good for medium-level application hosting and does not take up too much space in the DC."

"We replaced five 42U server racks with two IBM S Series Blade Center chassis."

"The servers have enabled us to run critical applications, backup of critical data, and storage systems on the same products without downtime issues that could otherwise be caused by hardware or software issues."

"Overall, the product has great value for money."

"BladeCenter HS22 provides great performance and reliability, with two Intel Xeon 5600 (3.60 GHz) processors and 12 VLP DDR-3 memory DIMMs, with expansion capability of 192 GB."

"Excellent support in case of any failure (and I am not saying this because I worked for IBM)"

More Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] pros

Cons

"Storage capacity could be enhanced."

"I guess with its ease of use, as far as the configuration of the virtual switches, and things like that all need work."

"I would say that the licensing model is probably the one biggest caveat I have."

"Alerting management could be better."

"Upgrading to the new 32 and 128Gb SAN is not possible."

"In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors."

"I would prefer to have changes in the compatibility of the blade servers along with the new ones designed by HPE."

"Additionally, our network is constantly getting saturated, so I would suggest also a faster network of fabrics as another improvement."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"Need some level of technical knowledge to configure it."

"It was quite unfortunate that I lost data while using this blade server."

"It needs better management software."

"The storage part of this product needs to be improved."

"Because this is an old IBM blade chassis model and servers, we faced a couple of issues during VMware implementation."

"Firmware updates are troublesome and difficult."

"If we talk about scalability, it is quite expensive, especially when you need to buy more blades."

"Performance is good, but on heavily non-linear workloads, they tend to have some issues."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."

"The licenses for HPE BladeSystem are perpetual."

"The price of HPE BladeSystem is less expensive than some other solutions, such as Dell. The cost of replacement equipment is expensive."

"Its pricing was good. We selected this solution because it was within our budget. We paid just once when we bought it. We never bought any license."

"The price for HPE BladeSystem can vary between $100,000 to $1 million or above. The price can be high."

"BladeSystem is a little bit cheaper."

"The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."

"I would recommend this solution for large enterprises. Medium-sized companies would find it difficult to afford the HPE BladeSystem's overall capital expenses."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

25%

Construction Company

13%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	104

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE BladeSystem?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 10% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Intel MFSYS25 vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

September 2026

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

September 2026

Download Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers

Overview

HPE BladeSystem provides centralized management and modular infrastructure, offering flexibility, efficiency, and high performance. Its compact and scalable design is suitable for seamless integration, enhancing connectivity while reducing downtime.

HPE BladeSystem is valued for its ability to consolidate infrastructure with reliable and scalable solutions, catering to needs across industries like telecommunications, finance, and education. Its intuitive management and robust connectivity deliver efficient management and power savings. However, improvements are needed in license registration, driver access, KVM integration, and cost effectiveness compared to competitors. Installation and software support require attention, and users seek better cloud integration.

What are HPE BladeSystem's key features?

iLO Remote Management: Enables effective remote server control and monitoring.
Centralized Management: Simplifies infrastructure oversight and reduces administrative load.
High Performance: Delivers efficient operation for demanding applications.
Modular Design: Allows flexible deployment and infrastructure consolidation.
Seamless Integration: Supports smooth integration with existing environments.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from HPE BladeSystem?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses through efficient power and space usage.
Reliability: Minimizes downtime with scalable and dependable performance.
Ease of Deployment: Simplifies setup and configuration processes.
Enhanced Management: Reduces administrative tasks with advanced control features.

HPE BladeSystem sees implementation in sectors like finance and telecommunications, being crucial for virtualization and enterprise applications involving VMware or Hyper-V. It supports operations such as high-availability clustering and data management, effectively maintaining legacy systems and enhancing server management with integrated tools.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.

Lenovo

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.