Frontegg vs Imprivata OneSign comparison

Frontegg and Imprivata are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Frontegg is ranked #19, while Imprivata is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0. Frontegg holds a 1.7% mindshare in SSO, compared to Imprivata’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Imprivata users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

813 Views
585 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Imprivata OneSign

Read 4 Imprivata OneSign reviews

1,340 Views
1,059 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Imprivata OneSign

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Imprivata OneSign and Frontegg compete in the authentication and authorization solutions category. While Imprivata OneSign has the upper hand in support and pricing, Frontegg is favored for its comprehensive feature set and adaptability, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Imprivata OneSign is appreciated for its reliable authentication mechanisms, integration capabilities with various healthcare applications, and user-friendly interface. Frontegg is valued for its comprehensive set of authentication and authorization features, flexibility, and ease of integration with different tech stacks, as well as for its advanced features.

Room for Improvement: Users of Imprivata OneSign suggest improvements in its mobile interface, faster customer support response times, and enhanced reporting capabilities. Frontegg users highlight the need for better documentation, occasional enhancements in its API functionalities, and more detailed initial set-up instructions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imprivata OneSign generally receives positive feedback regarding its deployment process in healthcare environments and commendable customer service. Frontegg users report a seamless deployment process aided by excellent customer support and a need for clearer initial setup instructions.

Pricing and ROI: Imprivata OneSign is praised for its competitive pricing and satisfactory return on investment, particularly in larger healthcare settings. Frontegg, despite being more expensive, delivers substantial ROI through its comprehensive features, making it a worthwhile investment for businesses seeking advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Imprivata OneSign Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Imprivata OneSign

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

19th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (36th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (13th)

Imprivata OneSign

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

10th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 1.7%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Imprivata OneSign is 2.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Imprivata OneSign	2.6%
Frontegg	1.7%
Other	95.7%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1660836

DevOps Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system

It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file. For security certifications, we need to make sure we can restore all of our products and data in minimal time. We are backing up the data using the API but it will be better to export everything to an external file so in case of a disaster or mistake from our side, we can have the option to reload all the users and assign them to the relevant tenant as fast as possible

Read full review

Rohit Yamsani

Senior Consultant at HCLSoftware

Single sign-on saves time by seamlessly managing passwords and improving workflow efficiency

What I appreciate best about Imprivata OneSign are the single sign-on and the Confirm ID features. The single sign-on works seamlessly for all the nurses or the end users out there. You just have to log in to the application once and the single sign-on clicks in and works for everyone. Users don't have to manually remember all their passwords. Imprivata OneSign helps by remembering and storing all passwords. The integration capabilities of Imprivata OneSign offer many possibilities, and there are numerous upgrades Imprivata has been implementing. At this point, they are growing rapidly. There are new tools coming out for reporting and generating real-time analysis. Imprivata E-PAM is a new feature that I've been reading about in articles, which is going to help administrator people and enterprise administrator personnel to view real-time records and views for all end customers. Reporting and looking at logs for the users will be seamlessly efficient. I use the reporting tools available in Imprivata OneSign. The admin console itself has a reporting feature, which gives us a list of pre-built templates of reports where you can see how many users have been added, the user policy, the users who have last logged in in specific amounts of days, and the reporting for the EPCS users. There are numerous reporting options available which help with troubleshooting issues. I have seen many benefits from using Imprivata OneSign. It saves substantial time for nurses. As a nurse or doctor, you don't have to spend time remembering passwords or signing into computers. You just need to grab the nearest machine and tap in. You can use the machine anytime if you want. It saves time when dealing with patients. For doctors who might not be tech-savvy, Imprivata OneSign helps them sign in seamlessly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."

"I have seen many benefits from using Imprivata OneSign. It saves substantial time for nurses."

"Imprivata OneSign helps customers minimize their work in remembering passwords and enhances their security."

"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."

Cons

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"They should have a landing page."

"Fast user switching and Citrix integration in Imprivata OneSign could improve. There are many options available for VDI connectivity, but I've seen issues with VDI connectivity and Citrix storefront connectivity."

"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."

"Imprivata OneSign should have a landing page because most customers prefer this feature, which is currently a strong point for competitors."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."

"At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Healthcare Company

27%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Imprivata OneSign?

Fast user switching and Citrix integration in Imprivata OneSign could improve. There are many options available for VDI connectivity, but I've seen issues with VDI connectivity and Citrix storefron...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Imprivata OneSign?

I have experience with Imprivata OneSign and Imprivata Confirm ID. For the past three and a half years, I've been using Imprivata OneSign 7.9 and Confirm ID 7.9 versions. The client I'm working wit...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Imprivata OneSign?

As an end user, it's easy to use Imprivata OneSign. Users don't have to rely much on knowledge to use that tool. It's basic, just an agent that sits on your machine and you shouldn't worry about an...

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg

Compared 46% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 17% of the time

Clerk.com vs Frontegg

Compared 10% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 9% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 25% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 13% of the time

Evidian Enterprise SSO vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 11% of the time

Tools4ever HelloID vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

More Imprivata OneSign Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

September 2025

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

September 2025

Download Imprivata OneSign product report

Also Known As

No data available

OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Imprivata OneSign delivers fast, secure no-click-access to the applications and information that care providers need, whenever and wherever they need it.

Security and regulatory compliance requirements mandate user authentication technology for accessing workstations and applications. As a result, care providers need to enter unique usernames and passwords (or PINs) for order signing, documentation signing, medication reconciliation and most other applications throughout their workflow. These laborious login requirements can disrupt clinical focus and obstruct patient care.

Imprivata

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Imprivata OneSign

September 2025

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Imprivata OneSign

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Imprivata OneSign and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Imprivata OneSign report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.