Frontegg vs Microsoft Entra ID comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Frontegg and Microsoft are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Frontegg is ranked #23, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6. Frontegg holds a 1.6% mindshare in SSO, compared to Microsoft’s 8.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

2,428 Views
1,457 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 278 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

47,247 Views
10,867 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Microsoft Entra ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Microsoft Entra ID and Frontegg are identity management solutions. Microsoft Entra ID edges out due to its integration and scalability within the Microsoft ecosystem, whereas Frontegg holds strong with its customizability and advanced authentication features.

What features are offered by Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID offers seamless integration with Microsoft products, scalability for growing enterprises, and robust security features. Frontegg provides extensive customizability, advanced authentication mechanisms, and rich developer-friendly tools for integrations.

What areas of improvement can be found in Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID could improve its documentation, enhance customer support response times, and expand third-party integration capabilities. Frontegg needs to provide more comprehensive onboarding materials, increase integration options with third-party apps, and improve the user experience for non-developers.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID is known for straightforward deployment within Microsoft environments and has a solid customer support structure. Frontegg is praised for its intuitive setup process and responsive customer service team, making it user-friendly for diverse environments.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID has competitive setup costs within the Microsoft suite, often yielding substantial ROI due to integration efficiencies. Frontegg's pricing is higher but users justify the cost by the specific features provided, perceiving higher long-term value aligned with its feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

23rd

Ranking in Authentication Systems

35th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (15th)

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

2nd

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

278

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (3rd), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 1.6%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 8.4%, down from 16.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Entra ID	8.4%
Frontegg	1.6%
Other	90.0%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

it_user1660836

DevOps Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system

It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file. For security certifications, we need to make sure we can restore all of our products and data in minimal time. We are backing up the data using the API but it will be better to export everything to an external file so in case of a disaster or mistake from our side, we can have the option to reload all the users and assign them to the relevant tenant as fast as possible

Read full review

Stafin Jacob

Microsoft 365 Security & Compliance Practice Lead at Invoke

Identity has become our central gatekeeper and has provided secure single sign-on for all users

Microsoft Entra ID can improve by focusing more on new passwordless methods and becoming a primary adopter. One feature we would like to see is the ability to have security questions for password resets. I know the current capability is phasing out, so we do not have an alternative method yet. Customers who already use security questions require a smoother transition for that capability to be available. My experience with the deployment has had some challenges, particularly around the Microsoft MFA campaigns. The hardest part is moving users from a different MFA provider to the Microsoft MFA provider, as it ultimately depends on user activity. In large enterprises with numerous users across various geographies, this transition takes time. If there are ways to exert more control around that process, it would improve the situation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"SaaS companies like ours can just focus on what matters and not spend time on building SaaS essentials such as audit logs, SSO etc."

"Frontegg enabled us to worry less about parts of the system that are not unique to our product, and instead spend more time developing out key value propositions."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"Frontegg's solution fits us very well, as it removes the extra work of developing, maintaining, storing, and securing all of the user-management platforms."

More Frontegg pros

"The security features are great. They will report in advance to you in the case of suspicious activity."

"Microsoft Authenticator is highly secure."

"The central authentication server is most valuable, and GPOs are useful for user and computer policies."

"If the ecosystem is Microsoft, I recommend Intune because it's Microsoft's end-to-end solution."

"The features of Microsoft Entra ID that I appreciate the most are the Conditional Access policies, because they provide granular aspects to enable features and offer flexibility across my user base, allowing me to provide the security features and protections needed for complex organizations."

"The identity and access management piece is probably the most valuable to us."

"Microsoft Entra ID's valuable features include integration capabilities, a simplified Active Directory approach, scalability, conditional access, and privileged identity management."

"Microsoft Entra ID has provided my company with a centralized place to establish a source of truth for the attributes of our personnel."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

Cons

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file."

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"The PHP SDK is limited."

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"It doesn't function the same way as an Active Directory inside of an infrastructure, that is, a physical infrastructure. In the cloud, it is all flat. That's one of the disadvantages."

"Tech support has its up and downs. So, sometimes it will take one week, and other times two weeks to resolve a case."

"The solution can improve the educational portion because it is an administration cost."

"Technical support is a thing they need to improve a lot from their side."

"I would like to dive into some of the things that we saw today around the workflows at this Microsoft event. I cannot say that they need to make it better because I do not have much experience with it, but something that is always applicable to Microsoft is that they need to be able to integrate with their competitors. If you look at IDP, they do not integrate with Okta."

"A nice feature that is not currently present, would be if they had some visualization tools."

"Its price should be improved. It is very expensive for Turkish people."

"Sometimes, users are not happy, but at the organizational level, it is good. It is costly, but the improvement is good in terms of performance and security."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Entra ID is not too bad, but Microsoft licensing generally is insane. Most customers normally buy a bundle license with Microsoft 365, E3, or E5. Out of our 2,000 customers, for 99.9% of our customers, the Entra ID license that they are getting through the part of that would be sufficient. There are some more advanced ones that give you a bit more functionality, but we probably have not had a customer for that. We do not even internally use that ourselves. When you buy the Entra ID license on its own, it is probably three or four pounds. You just get it included in the license."

"The licensing model makes it difficult to understand the real cost of the solution, especially because it changes all the time."

"If you have a different IDP today, I would take a close look at what your licensing looks like, then reevaluate the licensing that you have with Microsoft 365, and see if you're covered for some of this other stuff. Folks sometimes don't realize that, "Oh, I'm licensed for that service in Azure." This becomes one of those situations where you have the "aha" moment, "Oh, I didn't know we can do that. Alright, let's go down this road." Then, they start to have conversations with Microsoft to see what they can gain. I would recommend that they work closely with their TAM, just to make sure that they are getting the right level of service. They may just not be aware of what is available to them."

"Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis and the cost depends on the number of users."

"I'm not totally aware of the pricing and licensing, but I do know that the pricing and licensing must be quite balanced. We are a pretty old client of Microsoft, and MSA is just one of the services we use from Microsoft. There's a whole Microsoft 365 suite that's implemented as well. I'm sure it is something that is acceptable to both parties."

"The product is relatively affordable, especially compared to Okta, a pricey solution."

"From a pricing standpoint, with all the services that we get, we are okay. I do not see a problem with the pricing structure. We are getting our money's worth."

"The solution costs us 60,000 Rupees annually, just over $700, and there are no additional costs."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	91
Midsize Enterprise	42
Large Enterprise	162

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

I primarily use Microsoft Entra ID's free tier, so I have not faced any issues with pricing; I hope this free tier remains available for some time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Active Directory?

To improve Microsoft Entra ID, I believe it should be openable with third-party applications to use Microsoft Authenticator, which is currently tied to Entra. There should definitely be a way to re...

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 15% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 13% of the time

Okta Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 11% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Frontegg

Compared 5% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 23% of the time

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 3% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 2% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

October 2026

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

October 2026

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Also Known As

No data available

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Frontegg

Microsoft

Overview

Frontegg offers seamless SSO onboarding, granular role management, and robust RBAC/ABAC. It enhances security with webhooks and audit logs, supports Python and Flask, and delivers modern security with reCaptcha and MFA, all via an efficient admin console with React components.

Frontegg provides a comprehensive authentication and user management platform, facilitating quick implementation for SaaS companies with multi-tenancy needs. Its integration capabilities with Gmail and LinkedIn, coupled with granular permissions and React components, streamline frontend management. Despite minor limitations in the PHP SDK and requests for enhancements in user management and documentation, Frontegg's speed of bug fixes and transparent roadmap support development efforts, allowing organizations to focus on their core applications.

What are Frontegg's key features?

SSO: Facilitates seamless user onboarding.
Granular Roles and Permissions: Offers fine-tuned access control.
RBAC and ABAC Models: Enhances security policies.
Webhooks and Audit Logs: Improve organizational security.
Multi-tenant Design: Simplifies customer management.
Integration with Python and Flask: Eases development processes.
reCaptcha and MFA Policies: Delivers modern security standards.
React Login Components: Supports efficient user interface management.

Why should users evaluate Frontegg?

Quick Implementation: Saves time in deploying key features.
Transparent Roadmap: Aligns with development efforts.
Multi-tenancy Support: Addresses complex application needs.
Integration Capabilities: Enhances existing workflows and systems.

Many SaaS companies leverage Frontegg to incorporate user management, webhooks, and SSO efficiently. Its granular permissions and multi-tenancy support align well in industries requiring complex structures. Frontegg's integration options and agile features enable organizations to focus on their principal applications while relying on Frontegg for flexible authentication and management needs.

Frontegg

Microsoft Entra ID is an advanced identity and access management service offering seamless single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and centralized user access across applications, enhancing security and efficiency for organizations transitioning to cloud-based environments.

Recognized for its centralized management, Microsoft Entra ID significantly boosts organizational security by integrating features such as conditional access and identity protection. It supports a wide array of applications, facilitating a secure transition from on-premises to scalable cloud environments. By adopting robust security measures and flexible identity management, organizations can streamline operations and ensure consistent user experiences. However, challenges like confusing licensing costs, outdated documentation, and limited integration with non-Microsoft applications persist. Enhancements in technical support, interface design, and more granular permissions are needed to address these issues effectively.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Seamless Single Sign-On: Allows users to access multiple applications with one set of credentials.
Multifactor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security by requiring multiple forms of verification.
Conditional Access: Provides adaptive policies to ensure the right access under the right conditions.
Identity Protection: Detects and responds to potential vulnerabilities and threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Controls and monitors access to critical resources.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Entra ID?

Enhanced Security: Protects against unauthorized access and data breaches.
Operational Efficiency: Centralizes identity management to reduce administrative tasks.
Scalability: Supports growth by accommodating evolving IT environments.
Cost Management: Facilitates cost control through centralized systems and automated processes.

In healthcare, Microsoft Entra ID facilitates secure patient record access and compliance with industry regulations. Financial institutions rely on it for robust security measures in safeguarding client data. In the education sector, it streamlines access to online resources for students and faculty. Global enterprises benefit from its ability to manage complex identity frameworks across multiple regions, ensuring reliable security amidst increasing cyber threats.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID

November 2026

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.