You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Fortinet FortiToken vs Thales Authenticators comparison

Fortinet and Thales are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Fortinet is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while Thales is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Fortinet holds a 5.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Thales’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Thales users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiToken

Read 31 Fortinet FortiToken reviews

3,343 Views
2,875 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Thales Authenticators

Read 6 Thales Authenticators reviews

1,196 Views
945 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiToken

Thales Authenticators

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Thales Authenticators and Fortinet FortiToken are popular choices for authentication solutions. Thales Authenticators seems to have the upper hand for its comprehensive feature set, while Fortinet FortiToken is praised for its overall effectiveness and ease of use.

What features are offered by Thales Authenticators in comparison to Fortinet FortiToken?

Thales Authenticators supports a wide range of authentication methods and offers strong security measures. It also provides flexible deployment models. Fortinet FortiToken is known for its simplicity and integration capabilities, focusing on ease of use and straightforward deployment processes. Thales offers diverse features, whereas Fortinet aims for a more user-friendly approach.

What areas of improvement can be found in Thales Authenticators in comparison to Fortinet FortiToken?

Users suggest Thales Authenticators could benefit from streamlined administration to reduce complexity, enhanced multi-device support, and a more intuitive interface. Fortinet FortiToken could improve its multi-device functionality, interface design, and add more advanced features to match Thales' comprehensive offerings.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Thales Authenticators in comparison to Fortinet FortiToken?

Thales Authenticators offers various deployment models that can be complex for larger organizations, but their customer service is responsive and helpful. Fortinet FortiToken is praised for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service, making it easier to set up compared to Thales.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Thales Authenticators in comparison to Fortinet FortiToken?

Thales Authenticators has a higher setup cost but offers a substantial ROI due to its robust features. Fortinet FortiToken also has a significant setup cost and provides reliable ROI. Thales requires a larger initial investment for greater long-term returns, while Fortinet offers steady returns on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiToken

Ranking in Authentication Systems

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Thales Authenticators

Ranking in Authentication Systems

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiToken is 5.1%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thales Authenticators is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fortinet FortiToken	5.1%
Thales Authenticators	2.3%
Other	92.6%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Auf

Cybersecurity SNB Technical Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Has strengthened user authentication and remains reliable despite recent license transfer limitations

I love to work with Fortinet FortiToken because it's easy to configure with any user and with FortiAuthenticator. We uploaded it and use it for any authentication with any user, with integration with any device. With FortiAuthenticator, we integrated it with any server, such as Active Directory, and use the token for VPN and other purposes. In the future, we ask customers to use it with FortiAuthenticator, not just the token, as it provides better integration capabilities. When we buy a specific Fortinet FortiToken, we use it on FortiGate only. Fortinet FortiToken provides very important security benefits because it is used to manage FortiGate from outside, exclusively with Fortinet FortiToken. Without Fortinet FortiToken, administrators cannot use or add admin privileges or manage it from outside, as this could lead to attacks or malicious activity.

Read full review

Gustavo Merighi

Automation and Telecommunications Analyst at Grupo Energisa

Has an easy-to-use management interface and a straightforward initial setup process

Our primary use cases include multifactor authentication for VPN connections and access to security tools like jump servers and firewalls. We also use it to enhance security measures in an enterprise environment The most valuable feature is the YAML 2.0 integration. It has an easy-to-use…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is easy. You receive a QR code via email, scan it, and add it. No complicated procedures involved."

"Fortinet FortiToken has a lot of RADIUS functionality."

"The solution is pretty solid."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its mobile application. It is particularly beneficial as it eliminates the need for hardware management."

"The solution is simple and similar to Google Authenticator. It follows time-based authentication. We use it for hardware and software in one environment. The tool offers simple and fast authentication for SSL."

"Its ease of use is most valuable. It is simple to use and can be deployed out-of-the-box. It is quite a mature product with all the required features."

"I appreciate that it provides comprehensive security. It is tailored to this specific purpose, and it excels in fulfilling this purpose."

"Fortinet offers a comprehensive solution for network security, particularly with its very effective zero-trust network access approach."

More Fortinet FortiToken pros

"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."

"One valuable feature is Thales' ability to provide off-site tokens."

"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."

"Scalable and stable."

"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."

"The technical support services are good."

Cons

"Fortinet FortiToken could be lower for some markets."

"Fortinet FortiToken should improve its push notifications."

"The Fortinet FortiToken server doesn't have centralized integration with other Fortinet tools and third-party tools."

"We can only use the tool with the FortiToken Mobile app."

"The solution could introduce a mobile application instead of a physical product."

"I'm not sure if it's already available, however, I wonder if there's an option to have it sent to my email address instead of having it on the mobile app."

"The tool could be a little cheaper."

"The app could be improved so that you don't have to actually type in the code. It would be great if you can just do a prompt or push similar to the way Duo does."

More Fortinet FortiToken cons

"Lacks integration with other platforms."

"The product could be improved by adding more features for sending tokens via SMS or phone calls."

"We faced issues due to slow ticket responses, which improved over time."

"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."

"The stability could improve."

"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing is moderate and reasonable."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is the cheapest, and ten is the highest, I rate the pricing an eight."

"The solution’s price is good."

"The platform's licensing cost is reasonable for our organization."

"I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten. We purchased the solution at a reasonable price in 2019."

"The pricing is not very high, so I'd rate it around six out of ten, where one is high and ten is low."

"From an Indian perspective, it's definitely costlier."

"Fortinet FortiToken is not an expensive solution."

More Fortinet FortiToken pricing and cost advice

"There is an annual licensing fee."

"Thales is more expensive than its competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiToken?

The solution is simple and similar to Google Authenticator. It follows time-based authentication. We use it for hardware and software in one environment. The tool offers simple and fast authenticat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiToken?

Fortinet FortiToken could be improved with flexibility to move it from device to device. With a license, replacement is not possible because Fortinet removed this option. Any Fortinet FortiToken ca...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiToken?

The use case for Fortinet FortiToken involves restrictions on token movement. From two or three months ago, Fortinet has not approved moving FortiToken between devices. Users are not allowed to rep...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Thales Authenticators?

Currently, the solution fulfills our requirements. We are very satisfied with its features, and do not have any specific ideas for improvement right now. Perhaps, in the future, three-factor authen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Thales Authenticators?

Our employees, whether working on-site or remotely, use Thales Authenticators for two-factor authentication to log in to their laptops or PCs. This is our primary use case.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Thales Authenticators?

From our past years of experience, the solution is very smooth, and we have had a good experience with it. We would definitely recommend Thales to others for its reliability and features. I'd rate ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 25% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 16% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 14% of the time

Symantec VIP Access Manager vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortinet FortiToken Competitors

Utimaco SecurityServer vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 22% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 21% of the time

Atalla Hardware Security Module vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 8% of the time

RSA SecurID vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 6% of the time

More Thales Authenticators Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiToken

October 2025

Download Fortinet FortiToken product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

September 2025

Download Thales Authenticators product report

Also Known As

No data available

Gemalto Ezio, Ezio, Gemalto Authenticators, SafeNet Authentication Manager

Overview

As we've seen, passwords alone don't keep unwanted guests out of your network. Password-only authentication has led to security breaches, malware infections, and policy violations. With two-factor authentication, a password is used along with a security token and authentication server to provide far better security. Authorized employees can remotely access company resources safely using a variety of devices, ranging from lpatops to mobile phones.

Fortinet

Offering the broadest range of authentication methods and form factors, Thales allows customers to address numerous use cases, assurance levels, and threat vectors with unified, centrally managed policies—managed from one authentication back end delivered in the cloud or on premise.

Thales

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Standard Chartered Bank (SCB)

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators

September 2025

Free Report: Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.