We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiMail and Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Email Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The two main features that prove most beneficial for us are URL scanning and attachment scanning."
"I like its investigation capabilities, as that is what is most important to me. It is fairly simple with a user-friendly interface."
"Our customers are satisfied with Defender for 365 because Microsoft products are easy to use and customize to meet the client's needs. Everything is in one place, so we can adjust policies as needed for phishing, DLP, ATP, or any other security features that our clients want to apply."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365 is a stable solution."
"Defender helps us prioritize threats across our organization."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365's most valuable features are safe attachments and safe links."
"The email protection is excellent, especially in terms of anti-phishing policies."
"The product's scalability is good."
"The integration with FortiSandbox is good, and something that we utilize often."
"I love the integration between Fortinet products."
"The anti-spam features are valuable."
"I like the anti-spam and security features of Fortinet FortiMail, and that its features complement each other."
"The important feature is the application control, which makes administration much easier. It also has an intrusion prevention feature. There's also the wireless functionality, which works well with Huawei devices."
"The user quarantine feature in the solution is good...It is a stable solution."
"Fortinet FortiMail's most valuable features are its performance and security."
"The solution can scale."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector is the simple analysis of phishing emails."
"I like that it is very user-friendly and easy to install."
"I would rate the solution's stability at ten out of ten."
"It can effectively monitor outbound and inbound devices."
"There's room for improvement regarding the time frame for retrieving emails."
"The certification training for Defender for 365 needs to be deeper and incorporate Sentinel. I took all the security courses except one, and Sentinel isn't included."
"One area for improvement is integration. For example, when it comes to external SaaS platforms, we were not able to get a lot of information on integrations with such apps for security and authentication."
"Microsoft sometimes has downtime, and we'll get several incidents coming in back to back. We have a huge backlog of notifications, many of which may be false positives. However, there might be serious alerts, so we can't risk dismissing all of them at once."
"We need to be able to whitelist data at the backend."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365 should be more proactive."
"They can improve their security in a way where a customer can know if all their attachments are safe or not to open through a report. The solution does its job perfectly, but it never reports to the customer whether those attachments have been stopped before or not."
"In some situations, it has not been able to pick impersonated emails having no attachments. Technical support definitely has a scope for improvement."
"Fortinet FortiMail should allow more flexibility with the content rules."
"Issues with the current email search functionality."
"The product could incorporate even more artificial intelligence to enhance the functionality, but it is a competetive and intelligent product as it."
"The product's cybersecurity features could be better."
"FortiMail's dashboard is somewhat complex and could be made simpler."
"The solution could improve by making the UI more user-friendly and increasing spam and threat detection capabilities."
"The statistics and BI in general could be improved."
"The infrastructure could be improved."
"I would like to be able to send emails to a specific sandbox. This is a feature I would like to see added to the next release."
"Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector could improve by making it easier to use. Microsoft solutions are easier to use."
"It could be more user-friendly, easier to install, and lighter on the network. I would say that for all products because you do not need technical expertise to take care of it. When you have a user-friendly solution, it makes it easier for the vendors or companies like us. We do not have to go to the client's site to attend to issues all the time. Because it is user-friendly, they can take care of it after some training."
"The product's feature for message processing and blocking devices for bulk emails needs improvement."
More Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiMail is ranked 5th in Email Security with 57 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector is ranked 33rd in Email Security with 4 reviews. Fortinet FortiMail is rated 8.6, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiMail writes "Good GUI and configuring security policies is easy but the pricing needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector writes "Useful email analyzing, reliable, but setup could improve". Fortinet FortiMail is most compared with Cisco Secure Email, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Fortinet FortiMail Cloud and Proofpoint Email Protection, whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector is most compared with . See our Fortinet FortiMail vs. Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector report.
See our list of best Email Security vendors.
We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.