We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I did not experience any crashes. The solution has been stable in my usage."
"The solution is easy to manage."
"After the configuration, it is very stable, and in the last two years, I haven't been faced with many issues or product-related challenges."
"The Forcepoint tool is well developed. It is ranked in many evaluations at the top when it comes to enterprise DLP solutions. It has good artificial intelligence that enables our customers to focus on specific incidents, instead of having a complicated list of uncategorized incidents."
"The built-in rules, templates, and content classifiers are among the most valuable features. Some of the built-in patterns are good places to get started with. Along with the phrases, they are helpful in putting together policies and fine-tuning our policies."
"The integration is great."
"The GUI is very intuitive. That is the way I would explain its ease of use. It is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it captures where the data is being moved."
"It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage."
"We chose Forcepoint as part of our cybersecurity strategy, and one of the key expectations was to prevent data leakage."
"I am not able to get support directly from Forcepoint."
"It should integrate better with email."
"The solution lacks sufficient customization."
"We want to be able to do data classification better in the product and reduce false positives, especially on data loss prevention."
"The product is good, but the biggest issue is needing direct support from Forcepoint."
"The setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"This solution has a tendency to provide false-positive results."
"We faced some issues with the endpoint installation of the agent as it is not from a common ground."
"The deployment is a little bit difficult. It requires two to three separate servers for databases and the application."
"From an end user's perspective, it's not always clear what's happening with the DLP. It would be beneficial to have more use cases available, perhaps on a countrywide basis."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 51 reviews while Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is ranked 26th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP writes "Stable product, key part of cybersecurity strategy but country-specific configuration issues requiring manual work ". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Zscaler DLP, whereas Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is most compared with . See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.