FlutterFlow vs Hyland OnBase comparison

FlutterFlow and Hyland are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. FlutterFlow is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3, while Hyland is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7. FlutterFlow holds a 2.1% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Hyland’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of FlutterFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.

FlutterFlow

Read 3 FlutterFlow reviews

886 Views
620 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

3,322 Views
532 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FlutterFlow

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and FlutterFlow are prominent in enterprise content management and app development, respectively. Based on feedback, FlutterFlow seems to have the upper hand due to its user-friendly design and quicker deployment.

Features: Hyland OnBase has robust document management, extensive integration options, and workflow automation. FlutterFlow has a drag-and-drop interface, ease of app design, and accessibility for non-developers.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase could improve its user onboarding, reduce configuration complexity, and simplify navigation. FlutterFlow needs better performance, advanced coding options, and improved user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase offers comprehensive support but is time-consuming to deploy. FlutterFlow has quick deployment with straightforward setup but lacks responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase has higher setup costs with slower ROI, suitable for large operations. FlutterFlow is cost-effective with quicker ROI due to lower entry cost and faster deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed FlutterFlow vs. Hyland OnBase Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. Hyland OnBase

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FlutterFlow

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (16th), Enterprise Content Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of FlutterFlow is 2.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Luis Gerardo Meneses Hernandez

Software developer at Apps2Go TECH

Creates versatile applications seamlessly across platforms

I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter. It is easy to use when you understand the code, know how to use Docs, and understand the components of Flutter. It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments. Additionally, it works for both PC and iOS devices.

Read full review

Srinivas Rao Kagitha

Senior Onbase Developer & Administrator at HTC Global Services (INDIA) Private

Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features

The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the simplicity of making panels with Flutter."

"It allows you to create fragments that look good and work on both mobile and web environments."

"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."

"FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"

"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."

More Hyland OnBase pros

Cons

"I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't gotten there yet."

"Scaling depends on project requirements."

"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."

"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

More Hyland OnBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the licensing costs a three out of ten, with ten being expensive and one being cheap. Currently, I use the free version."

"The tool's price is high."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Media Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FlutterFlow?

FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FlutterFlow?

Right now, I think it's a good tool. It's easy to understand when you know Dart. It helps create applications, and I am trying to see how it can be integrated with the backend. That said, I haven't...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FlutterFlow?

Currently, I am using Flutter to make a dashboard.

See all answers

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?

The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, ad...

See all answers

Comparisons

Lovable vs FlutterFlow

Compared 53% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs FlutterFlow

Compared 25% of the time

Mendix vs FlutterFlow

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs FlutterFlow

Compared 6% of the time

OutSystems vs FlutterFlow

Compared 5% of the time

More FlutterFlow Competitors

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 11% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

August 2025

Download FlutterFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

August 2025

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

OnBase

Overview

FlutterFlow is used for developing mobile applications quickly and efficiently, ideal for building prototypes, MVPs, and full-fledged applications without extensive coding experience. It supports cross-platform development, enabling simultaneous deployment on Android and iOS.

FlutterFlow's visual development tools and integrations streamline the app creation process, making it perfect for startups and developers looking to launch their apps faster. Its comprehensive drag-and-drop interface, pre-built components, and templates facilitate rapid app development. Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections, and the robust documentation and tutorials support quick learning. Real-time collaboration features improve teamwork, enhancing the development experience.

What are the most important features of FlutterFlow?

Comprehensive drag-and-drop interface accelerates app development.
Pre-built components and templates streamline design processes.
Integration with Firebase simplifies backend connections.
Robust documentation and tutorials support rapid learning.
Real-time collaboration enhances teamwork.

What benefits or ROI should be looked for when evaluating FlutterFlow?

Quick app development with a visual interface.
Reduction in development costs and timelines.
Ease of integrating backend services.
Enhanced team collaboration during development.

FlutterFlow can be particularly useful in industries that require fast app iterations, such as startups and tech companies. Its support for cross-platform development is beneficial for companies targeting both Android and iOS markets. The ease of use and comprehensive support make it an appealing choice for businesses looking to launch functional apps quickly, without extensive coding knowledge. Though improvements in stability, performance, customization, debugging, and customer support are needed, FlutterFlow's overall features present a strong front for efficient app development.

FlutterFlow

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Buyer's Guide

FlutterFlow vs. Hyland OnBase

July 2025

Free Report: FlutterFlow vs. Hyland OnBase

Find out what your peers are saying about FlutterFlow vs. Hyland OnBase and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FlutterFlow vs. Hyland OnBase report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.