We performed a comparison between FlutterFlow and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Low-Code Development Platforms."FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."
"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The features I find the most valuable are the 365 and Microsoft applications integrations and the automation."
"The model that allows you to establish flow automation is getting a lot of traction from the customer side. It offers a lot of flexibility."
"Can design apps quickly and can connect to any database."
"We were impressed with the functionality of the solution."
"The initial setup is not complicated."
"The support is the most valuable feature."
"The speed of the solution is valuable."
"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."
"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."
"Its user interface can be better. It is good, but it can be a bit clunky."
"This tool doesn't have an internal database. It only relies on the data layer of Microsoft Cloud."
"They probably need to improve intelligent document processing."
"As far as dealing with SharePoint, it'll allow you to ha manage up to 2000 rows, however, performance-wise, they're recommending that you just keep it at the default of 500 rows."
"The set up of the solution could be simpler."
"The fact that we couldn't share that with our other organization or outside of the organization, consisting of our colleagues in the joint ventures, was a weakness of the solution."
"Customer support needs improvement."
"The solution needs a bit more refinement in general."
FlutterFlow is ranked 17th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 2 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Low-Code Development Platforms with 77 reviews. FlutterFlow is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of FlutterFlow writes "Simplifies integrations, accelerates development timelines, and offers a good MVP". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". FlutterFlow is most compared with Mendix, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Boomi AtomSphere Flow.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.