No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Flowgear vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Flowgear
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
24th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Flowgear is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 3.7%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps3.7%
Flowgear1.3%
Other95.0%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2110344 - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead: Solution Developer at Genasys Technologies (Pty) Ltd
Great features, effortless integrations and offers an enhanced experience for users
Some of my current wishlist items for improvements would be to extend the existing timeout setting or have that setting configurable at a user level. Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required. Also related to the designing and testing of larger and more complex workflows, navigation is sometimes cumbersome. A means of easily navigating and following the various connectors and workflow links would be a welcomed addition.
Gayatri Dhawade - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Architect at Abcl
Has supported seamless integration flows while requiring improvement in cost transparency
Assessing the ease of connecting disparate systems using Microsoft Azure Logic Apps connectors is simple because we have a Standard Operating Process. If we want to use Logic Apps, we just reserve the instances as per our requirement. Even for Blob storage, we use tokenized endpoints that give us access to this storage account, making it secure. At API Gateway, we have policies that help us implement encryption and decryption. Request parameters are mapped automatically, converted to SOAP, XML, or JSON as needed in different formats. We utilize its monitoring capabilities; Event Grids are used for logging events. Additionally, we have implemented a retry mechanism and are using Azure Monitor for end-to-end request tracing.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."
"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."
"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."
"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."
"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."
"Great for data flow."
"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."
"The prebuilt connectors available for SAP are really useful."
"We mainly used it to integrate SAP, ServiceNow, and different third-party APIs with the front end."
"Azure Logic Apps has influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent in many cases and is generally 30% to 40% cheaper than any comparable services in this space."
"The product's most valuable feature is scalability."
"The tool’s biggest benefit is the access we have to other Azure products."
"Easy to use and is able to integrate with other Azure-based environments."
"My experience with Microsoft Azure products is great; they have many tools that support synchronous and asynchronous calls."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."
 

Cons

"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."
"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."
"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."
"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."
"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."
"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."
"The UI could be improved."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB."
"Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it."
"The solution should include more connectors."
"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."
"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."
"We wanted to use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, but we faced a timeout."
"The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services."
"The visual tool that is used to build integration is quite old."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The tool’s pricing could be better."
"The pricing is not expensive."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is a little bit expensive, and that is why you use it only for certain types of scenarios."
"If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."
"It is a cost-efficient platform."
"The tool's cost can vary depending on your specific use case. Generally, it's considered cheaper, but the price depends on how much you use it and which features you need. Initially, there was a consumption-based pricing model, but now Microsoft offers a standard tier. Microsoft encourages users to migrate from the consumption model to the standard one by 2025. The pricing is a monthly fixed cost, depending on your usage needs."
"The licensing is cheaper because, compared to other services, Azure services are much cheaper and affordable."
"The product is quite cheap."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise24
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
Regarding the cost, I find Microsoft Azure Logic Apps to be reasonable; it is not expensive.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
My experience with their pricing indicates that pricing is complicated to understand and costly. There should be some cost reduction. Currently, I don't have any use case beyond what the readily av...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
The primary use case for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps in my system is mainly API Gateway; it serves as an interface between the external world and our entire ERP landscape. Any request which flows in...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
Find out what your peers are saying about Flowgear vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.