We performed a comparison between Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Riskified and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions."
"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms."
"The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data."
"It's a very good case management system."
"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."
"The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable."
"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex."
"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."
"One of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side."
"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."
More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is ranked 7th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 1 review while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 2nd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 4 reviews. Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is rated 9.0, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub writes "A flexible solution with a quick to navigate interface ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Offers robotics, machine learning, and enables us to reduce analysts ". Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is most compared with ThreatMetrix, Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection, FICO Falcon Platform and Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS), whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, SAS Fraud Management, ThreatMetrix and IBM Trusteer.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
