Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Riskified and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: November 2022).
656,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions."

More Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub Pros →

"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms.""The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data.""It's a very good case management system.""Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."

More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pros →

Cons
"The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable."

More Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub Cons →

"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex.""I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice.""One of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side.""It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."

More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is reasonable. It is not cheap, but it is fair."
  • More Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job."
  • "I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."
  • More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
    656,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions.
    Top Answer:The pricing is reasonable. It is not cheap, but it is fair.
    Top Answer:The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable. I was familiar with the Falcon expert language to write rules, so I had to get used to the new language used in this… more »
    Top Answer:I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job.
    Top Answer:I use it for financial claims monitoring. I am using its previous version.
    Top Answer:The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data.
    Ranking
    Views
    836
    Comparisons
    583
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    813
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    2,486
    Comparisons
    811
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    1,579
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ARIC Fraud Hub, ARIC platform
    Actimize, NICE Actimize, Nice Actimize Fraud and Authentication Management)
    Learn More
    Overview

    Featurespace’s ARIC engine is the smartest technological approach to fraud management, developed to cope with the constant threat of new fraud attacks, while enabling businesses to accept their genuine customers – on premise or via secure cloud.

    Featurespace’s ARIC engine (Adaptive, Real-time, Individual, Change Identification) is a real-time, machine learning, fraud management software platform for organisations in financial services, insurance and gaming.

    Delivers real-time, customer-centric fraud prevention that supports a holistic, enterprise-wide fraud management program.
    Offer
    Learn more about Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub
    Learn more about Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management
    Sample Customers
    TSYS, OpenBet, William Hill, Zapp, Credit Reference Agency, Responsible Gambling Trust, Betfair, kPMG, Camelot
    Associated Banc-Corp
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Educational Organization5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm35%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Insurance Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Riskified and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: November 2022.
    656,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is ranked 7th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 1 review while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 2nd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 4 reviews. Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is rated 9.0, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub writes "A flexible solution with a quick to navigate interface ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Offers robotics, machine learning, and enables us to reduce analysts ". Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is most compared with ThreatMetrix, Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection, FICO Falcon Platform and Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS), whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, SAS Fraud Management, ThreatMetrix and IBM Trusteer.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.