Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more
  • Home
  • IBM Safer Payments vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

IBM Safer Payments vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
September 2022
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Safer Payments and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Safer Payments vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management report (Updated: September 2022).
Download the complete report
635,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM Safer Payments?
Anonymous User
Loads big data efficiently and quickly but requires a lot of hardware
The banks are having a difficult time with all the fraud that is going on. Actimize provides a safe solution that helps keep their reputation intact.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job."
  • "I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."

    • More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    635,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nice Actimize Fra...
    Top Answer:I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Ma...
    Top Answer:I use it for financial claims monitoring. I am using its previous version.
    Read all 10 answers   →
    What do you like most about Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
    Top Answer:The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data.
    Read all 10 answers   →
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 50 in Fraud Detection and Prevention
    Views
    903
    Comparisons
    613
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    out of 50 in Fraud Detection and Prevention
    Views
    2,218
    Comparisons
    781
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    977
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Actimize, NICE Actimize, Nice Actimize Fraud and Authentication Management)
    Learn More
    IBM
    NICE
    Overview

    Adapt faster to changing threats and new products by dramatically shrinking the time it takes to test and deploy new profiles, rules, and models. Using a unique cognitive computing approach, IBM Safer Payments profiles the behavior of any entity and delivers best-fit analytics interactively to fraud professionals. This proven technology is already protecting some of the world's largest and most complex payment portfolios. Outthink fraud by rethinking detection.

    Delivers real-time, customer-centric fraud prevention that supports a holistic, enterprise-wide fraud management program.
    Offer
    Learn more about IBM Safer Payments
    Learn More
    Learn more about Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    Borgun
    Associated Banc-Corp
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Computer Software Company24%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    University3%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company24%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    September 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: September 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    635,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Safer Payments is ranked 13th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 10 reviews. IBM Safer Payments is rated 0.0, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Offers robotics, machine learning, and enables us to reduce analysts ". IBM Safer Payments is most compared with SAS Fraud Management, IBM Trusteer, ThreatMetrix, FICO Falcon Platform and Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, SAS Fraud Management, FICO Falcon Platform and ThreatMetrix.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.