We performed a comparison between IBM Safer Payments and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Earn 20 points
Adapt faster to changing threats and new products by dramatically shrinking the time it takes to test and deploy new profiles, rules, and models. Using a unique cognitive computing approach, IBM Safer Payments profiles the behavior of any entity and delivers best-fit analytics interactively to fraud professionals. This proven technology is already protecting some of the world's largest and most complex payment portfolios. Outthink fraud by rethinking detection.
IBM Safer Payments is ranked 13th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 10 reviews. IBM Safer Payments is rated 0.0, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Offers robotics, machine learning, and enables us to reduce analysts ". IBM Safer Payments is most compared with SAS Fraud Management, IBM Trusteer, ThreatMetrix, FICO Falcon Platform and Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, SAS Fraud Management, FICO Falcon Platform and ThreatMetrix.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.