Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Exabeam vs Seq comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Exabeam
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (15th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (1st), Security Incident Response (5th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (10th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (11th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (10th)
Seq
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (47th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Exabeam and Seq aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Exabeam is designed for Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and holds a mindshare of 1.6%, up 1.2% compared to last year.
Seq, on the other hand, focuses on Log Management, holds 1.0% mindshare, up 1.0% since last year.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Exabeam1.6%
Splunk Enterprise Security7.1%
Wazuh6.4%
Other84.9%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Log Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Seq1.0%
Wazuh8.3%
Splunk Enterprise Security6.9%
Other83.8%
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

DH
Solution Architect at CTC
Improved threat detection has provided clear user risk insights and streamlined incident response
Exabeam's UEBA is the most valuable feature that I have found so far. Exabeam's UEBA displays the type of description that it could show in a console regarding one particular user, the rating that it shows, and how vulnerable the user is, which is very good. Exabeam's automation for incident response is very good. The machine learning capabilities of Exabeam are also good.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Media Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
I do not have much information about the pricing. However, I am aware that Exabeam is cheaper than Palo Alto based on discussions in meetings.
What needs improvement with Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
We use the on-prem Exabeam product and face limitations using the web UI and administration of custom models and rules. I have explored the SaaS version; it offers many new features. We are conside...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
1. Airbnb 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. Airbnb 6. Adobe 7. ADP 8. AIG 9. Airbus 10. Alibaba 11. Allstate 12. Amazon 13. American Express 14. AmerisourceBergen 15. Amgen 16. Apple 17. ATT 18. Autodesk 19. Avon 20. Bank of America 21. BASF 22. Bayer 23. Berkshire Hathaway 24. BlackRock 25.Boeing 26. Bristol-Myers Squibb 27. Cisco 28. CocaCola 29. Comcast 30. ConocoPhillips 31. Constellation Brands 32. Costco
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, IBM and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: February 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.