Elastic Security vs Graylog Enterprise comparison

Elastic and Graylog are both solutions in the Log Management category. Elastic is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.6, while Graylog is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Elastic holds a 3.3% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Graylog’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Graylog users who would recommend it.

Elastic Security

Read 66 Elastic Security reviews

17,109 Views
7,699 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Graylog Enterprise

Read 26 Graylog Enterprise reviews

8,652 Views
8,565 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Elastic Security

Graylog Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Graylog Enterprise and Elastic Security compete in log management and security data analysis. Elastic Security has the upper hand due to its advanced features, despite Graylog's cost-efficiency advantages.

Features:Graylog offers fast data ingestion, robust correlation features, and real-time threat detection, making it effective for quick security insights. Elastic Security provides comprehensive threat intelligence integration, advanced anomaly detection, and extensive security analysis, offering a deeper level of insights for security operations.

Room for Improvement:Graylog could enhance its alerting and expand its integration capabilities for better operational efficiency. There's also a need to improve its parsing capabilities. Elastic Security might benefit from streamlining its technical support to be more accessible and enhancing its initial setup process for ease of use. Greater customization options in reporting could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Graylog supports both on-premises and cloud-hosted deployment, offering flexibility and a dedicated support structure. Elastic Security's deployment focuses on cloud-centric solutions, providing streamlined integration but with more advanced technical guidance, catering to organizations needing in-depth support for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI:Graylog has a cost-effective pricing model with lower setup expenses, providing a good ROI for budget-conscious businesses. In contrast, Elastic Security requires a higher initial investment but is viewed as offering greater long-term value due to its advanced analytics, appealing to organizations looking for comprehensive security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,838 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Security

Ranking in Log Management

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (7th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (19th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (11th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (12th)

Graylog Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Elastic Security is 3.3%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog Enterprise is 2.8%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Graylog Enterprise	2.8%
Elastic Security	3.3%
Other	93.9%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Laurentiu Popescu

Chief Product Officer at ClusterPower

Has improved threat detection with deep log analysis and streamlined investigation workflows

The most useful features I find in Elastic Security are the forensic ones that allow us to carry deeper analysis into the logs for in-depth investigations, and the dashboards, with the reporting dashboard being quite user-friendly. Elastic Security is quite good at identifying threats, as it is part of the deep investigation tool that I mentioned before. Unless we need to look further into a certain log, we can carry out a deeper analysis and forensics on those particular logs. I can assess the impact of Elastic Security's real-time data analysis on our threat response efficiency as working pretty good. We are looking for real-time analysis because we have a continuous inflow of logs from different sources: from our cloud, from Active Directory, from our network. So it works pretty well.

Read full review

NicolaeCIornii

Security Officer at JSC "Moldtelecom" S.A.

Log analysis has become clearer and faster but visualization and extensibility still need work

The problem was with the complexity and the cost to add extensions. We found this very expensive to buy another version with additional features. I think that Graylog Enterprise does not have customizable dashboards. I did not see them in Graylog Enterprise because most of the time we used the open source free version, which is limited. I think Graylog Enterprise should improve some things that they have in the paid version and perhaps provide users with a menu that gives examples of parsing logs and draws graphics so that people do not need to improve another system such as Grafana. This would be interesting. When it comes to functionalities, I found the log management in Graylog Enterprise acceptable. It is very simple to use and to collect logs. It has support for different protocols and different ports, and the sidecar is easy to use. However, in visualization, I think it needs to be much better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The cost is reasonable. It's not overly pricey."

"In terms of query resolution, error searching finding and production issues, we're able to find issues quicker."

"The most valuable features are the speed, detail, and visualization. It has the latest standards."

"The most valuable feature is the scalability. We are in Indonesia, more engineers understand Elastic Security here. So it is easier to scale and also develop. In features, the discovery to query all the logs is very important to us. It is very easy, especially with the query function and the feature to generate alerts and create tools. Sometimes we use the alert security dashboard to monitor our clients."

"I like that it's a SIEM platform. I like that I can sell Elastic Security quickly. Elastic Security has a large community that can support users."

"The intelligence of the system has been very impressive. It's not quite AI, but the technical bit where it correlates information, based on the seen attacks within an organization is good."

"ELK Logstash is easy and fast, at least for the initial setup with the out of box uses."

"This solution enables us to monitor application performance from Elasticsearch and we can predict some behaviors for applications using ELK."

More Elastic Security pros

"Real-time UDP/GELF logging and full text-based searching."

"The ability to write custom alerts is key to information security and compliance."

"The centralized logs where one can find bugs quicker and find the line of code that is a problem has made us more efficient."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its new interface."

"Allowing us to set up alerts and integrate with platforms we already use, such as Slack and OpsGenie to alert users of these errors proactively, is also a very useful feature."

"One of the most valuable features is that you are able to do a very detailed search through the log messages in the overview."

"I like the simplicity of the solution, the fact that it's open source and user friendly."

"I like the correlation and the alerting."

More Graylog Enterprise pros

Cons

"There are connectors to gather logs for Windows PCs and Linux PCs, but if we have to get the logs from Syslog then we have to do it manually, and this should be automated."

"Continuous upgrades can be quite inconvenient. My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently."

"The solution needs to be more reactive to investigations. We need to be able to detect and prevent any attacks before it can damage our infrastructure. Currently, this solution doesn't offer that."

"Authentication is not a default in Kibana. We need to have another tool to have authentication and authorization. These two should be part of Kibana."

"Elastic Security could improve the documentation. It would help if they were more simple and clean."

"The problem with ELK is it's difficult to administer. When you have a problem, it can be very, very difficult to rebuild indexes."

"In terms of what could be improved with Elastic, in some use cases, especially on the advanced level, they are not ready made, so you'll have to write some scripts."

"The solution could also use better dashboards. They need to be more graphical, more matrix-like."

More Elastic Security cons

"Its scalability gets complicated when we have to update or edit multiple nodes."

"Graylog Enterprise performs well overall; however, the UI could be improved because the SOC team creates multiple dashboards based on their use cases, and creating dashboards is complex."

"The initial setup was really complex because I did it myself."

"The area in Graylog that needs to be improved or enhanced would be the integrations."

"The biggest problem is the collector application, as we wanted to avoid using Graylog Collector Sidecar due to its architecture."

"I wouldn't recommend the enterprise version, but as an open source solution, it is solid and works really well."

"The technical support is a weak point in this product. It's not so easy to contact them and they don't answer immediately."

"Lacks sufficient documentation."

More Graylog Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Affordable but with additional costs"

"I find it better than Splunk in terms of cost-effectiveness. For cost-effectiveness, I would rate it a nine out of 10."

"The price is reasonable. It probably costs the same as ArcSight and LogRhythm SIEM. FortiSIEM might cost less than Elastic Security. There are no hidden or additional costs."

"The licensing cost of Elastic Security is based on the daily ingestion rate. I can't recall the exact figure, but for 10GB of log action daily, it would cost around $20,000."

"This is an open-source product, so there are no costs."

"It is easy to deploy, easy to use, and you get everything you need to become operational with it, and have nothing further to pay unless you want the OLED plugin."

"It's a monthly cost with Elastic SIEM, but I am not sure of the exact cost."

"When compared to other products, the price is average or on the low side."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."

"I use the free version of Graylog."

"Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements."

"We're using the Community edition."

"I am using a community edition. I have not looked at the enterprise offering from Graylog."

"You get a lot out-of-the-box with the non-enterprise version, so give it a try first."

"It's open source and free. They have a paid version, but we never looked into that because we never needed the features of the paid version."

"We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive."

More Graylog Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,838 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

I am satisfied with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing cost. It is a pure 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Security?

I do not have any specific recommendations for improvements in Elastic Security, but I feel that the AI module should get more mature. These machine learning algorithms become better with time; as ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?

I am not sure about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing because that was dealt with by a different team that handled the licensing and procurement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Graylog?

Graylog Enterprise performs well overall; however, the UI could be improved because the SOC team creates multiple dashboards based on their use cases, and creating dashboards is complex. If there w...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Graylog?

Graylog Enterprise is used primarily for log management and to perform security analytics. It helps the organization collect logs from different sources and centralize them in one place. We can sea...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Elastic Security

Compared 2% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

Grafana Loki vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

Wazuh vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

syslog-ng vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

Security Onion vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Graylog Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security

June 2026

Download Elastic Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise

June 2026

Download Graylog Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

Graylog2

Overview

Elastic Security stands out for its speed, scalability, and intuitive interface. It integrates seamlessly with Elasticsearch and Kibana, providing efficient data indexing, centralized log management, and intelligent threat identification, all while being open-source.

Elastic Security offers robust capabilities in security monitoring, threat identification, and SIEM functionalities. Its open-source nature enhances scalability, facilitating log aggregation and infrastructure monitoring. Users appreciate the intuitive dashboards and machine learning integration, which aid in proactive security measures and anomaly detection. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in documentation, scalability, and configuration complexity. High data volume pricing and limited machine learning support are concerns, while dashboard enhancement and seamless integration with existing systems are desirable. The platform is widely used for alerting suspicious activities, analyzing logs from firewalls and Active Directory, and providing endpoint protection. It serves as a key tool for security awareness and auditing, integrating effectively with technologies like Kibana and OpenShift.

What are the most notable features of Elastic Security?

Speed and Scalability: Quickly processes large volumes of data with ease.
Intuitive Interface: Provides a user-friendly experience for efficient navigation and management.
Centralized Log Management: Consolidates logs for easier monitoring and analysis.
Threat Identification: Intelligent features help detect and alert potential threats.
Machine Learning Integration: Applies advanced analytics to identify anomalies.

What benefits or ROI should be considered in reviews?

Affordability: Offers cost-effective security solutions.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse IT environments and security needs.
Forensic Capabilities: Enables detailed security analysis and incident response.
Community Support: Leverages a broad community for shared insights and assistance.

Organizations deploy Elastic Security across industries for log aggregation and security monitoring, detecting unauthorized access, and analyzing system logs. It is essential for infrastructure monitoring and integrates effectively with systems such as Fluentd and OpenShift, supporting comprehensive security views across enterprise environments.

Elastic

Graylog Enterprise, recognized for log collection, real-time search, and enriched data handling, offers an open-source framework that integrates seamlessly with Elasticsearch. Its user-centric interface streamlines data correlation and log aggregation, supporting both backend services and comprehensive monitoring needs.

Graylog Enterprise stands out for its stability and powerful log management capabilities, facilitating efficient log aggregation, real-time updates, and data analytics. Users benefit from its plugin-based alerting, user-friendly interface, and support for microservices, including Docker integration. The ability to search in detail, flexible API integration, and data enrichment features are highly valued. Challenges include collector application issues, desired visualization enhancements, and authentication integration improvements. Users seek advancements in UI customization, backup functions, and easier rule creation.

What are Graylog Enterprise's most important features?

Log Collection: Efficiently aggregates and handles diverse logs.
Real-Time Search: Provides immediate log data access.
Custom Alerts: Plugin-based alerting for tailored notifications.
Dashboard Enhancements: Improved visualization for data insights.
Data Enrichment: Adds value through detailed log analysis.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Audit Trail Support: Essential for compliance in financial sectors.
Security Event Correlation: Enables incident analysis and response.
Faster Issue Identification: Speeds up troubleshooting with detailed visualization.
API Flexibility: Seamless integration across systems and environments.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Centralized log management enhances oversight.

In industrial use, Graylog Enterprise is crucial for audit trailing in financial sectors, facilitating security event identification and error monitoring. Backend teams leverage real-time analytics for swift issue resolution, while developers appreciate the comprehensive log visualization enabled by Docker integration for microservice management.

Graylog

Sample Customers

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise

June 2026

Free Report: Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,838 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.