Elastic Security vs Graylog Enterprise comparison

Elastic and Graylog are both solutions in the Log Management category. Elastic is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while Graylog is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0. Elastic holds a 2.9% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Graylog’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Graylog users who would recommend it.

Elastic Security

Read 66 Elastic Security reviews

10,801 Views
5,401 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Graylog Enterprise

Read 21 Graylog Enterprise reviews

7,882 Views
7,882 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Elastic Security

Graylog Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 8, 2025

Graylog Enterprise and Elastic Security are competitive products in the log management and security domains, with Graylog having an edge in ease of deployment and customer service and Elastic Security offering a more comprehensive feature set and scalable architecture.

Features: Graylog Enterprise offers efficient log management capabilities, customizable dashboards, and a comprehensive alerting system. Elastic Security provides advanced threat detection, behavioral analytics, and seamless integration with diverse data sources.

Room for Improvement: Graylog Enterprise could improve by enhancing integration capabilities, developing more advanced analytics features, and expanding scalability. Elastic Security could benefit from a simpler deployment process, better user interface refinements, and cost optimization for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Graylog Enterprise has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Elastic Security requires more technical expertise during deployment but offers detailed documentation and broad community resources.

Pricing and ROI: Graylog Enterprise is cost-effective, offering competitive pricing that may suit smaller organizations with a favorable ROI. Elastic Security, while more expensive, justifies its cost with robust features and scalability, providing long-term value for comprehensive security measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 876,419 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Security

Ranking in Log Management

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (16th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (5th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)

Graylog Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Elastic Security is 2.9%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog Enterprise is 5.4%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Elastic Security	2.9%
Graylog Enterprise	5.4%
Other	91.7%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Laurentiu Popescu

Chief Product Officer at ClusterPower

Has improved threat detection with deep log analysis and streamlined investigation workflows

The most useful features I find in Elastic Security are the forensic ones that allow us to carry deeper analysis into the logs for in-depth investigations, and the dashboards, with the reporting dashboard being quite user-friendly. Elastic Security is quite good at identifying threats, as it is part of the deep investigation tool that I mentioned before. Unless we need to look further into a certain log, we can carry out a deeper analysis and forensics on those particular logs. I can assess the impact of Elastic Security's real-time data analysis on our threat response efficiency as working pretty good. We are looking for real-time analysis because we have a continuous inflow of logs from different sources: from our cloud, from Active Directory, from our network. So it works pretty well.

Read full review

reviewer2704128

Head of Cyber Security & CTO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Robust event correlation enhances operations, yet integration scope can broaden for seamless data handling

The features and capabilities of Graylog that we have found most valuable are related to its basis on open search, which was ElasticSearch. We appreciate being able to integrate custom feeds and do custom parsers, and to be able to do some of the correlation on it. That all works effectively. The Graylog features that have proven to be most beneficial for our data analysis in particular are that we tend to use it as a big data store, so we have the correlation rules that, if something matches under certain conditions, it raises an alarm. We use it for investigating problems and problem management. We throw all the information at it, we have it alerting for certain conditions, but generally we use it for deep diving into issues as needed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Elastic Security actually has a very good cost-benefit ratio compared to other vendors in the market."

"I like the indexing of the logs."

"Elastic Security is very easy to adapt."

"It is very quick to react. I can set it to check anomalies or suspicious behavior every 30 seconds. It is very fast."

"The intelligence of the system has been very impressive. It's not quite AI, but the technical bit where it correlates information, based on the seen attacks within an organization is good."

"The most valuable features are the speed, detail, and visualization. It has the latest standards."

"The performance is good and it is faster than IBM QRadar."

"ELK Logstash is easy and fast, at least for the initial setup with the out of box uses."

More Elastic Security pros

"Graylog is valuable because it bridges technical knowledge to non-technical teams, presenting complex backend processes in a simple timeline."

"Graylog's search functionality, alerting functionality, user management, and dashboards are useful."

"The product is scalable. The solution is stable."

"This had increased productivity for the dev and support teams, because we are directly notifying them."

"The Graylog features that have proven to be most beneficial for our data analysis in particular are that we tend to use it as a big data store, so we have the correlation rules that, if something matches under certain conditions, it raises an alarm."

"Everything stands out as valuable, including the fact that I can quantify and qualify the logs, create pipelines and process the logs in any way I like, and create charts or data maps."

"The build is stable and requires little maintenance, even compared to some extremely expensive products."

"We're using the Community edition, but I know that it has really good dashboarding and alerts."

More Graylog Enterprise pros

Cons

"They don't provide user authentication and authorisation features (Shield) as a part of their open-source version."

"There is an area of improvement in the Logs list. The load list may need to be paginated as there are limits."

"Authentication is not a default in Kibana. We need to have another tool to have authentication and authorization. These two should be part of Kibana."

"One limitation of Elastic Security is that it does not have built-in workflows for all tasks. For example, if you need a workflow for compliance, you will need to create a custom workflow."

"Its documentation should be a bit better. I have to spend at least a couple of hours to find the solution for a simple thing. When we buy Elastic, training is not included for free with Elastic. We have to pay extra for the training. They should include training in the price."

"Continuous upgrades can be quite inconvenient. My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently."

"Elastic Security's maintenance is hard and its scalability is a challenge. There are complications in scaling and upgrading. The solution needs to also provide periodic upgrade checks."

"The tool should improve its scalability."

More Elastic Security cons

"The infrastructure cost is the main issue. I like the rest. If the infrastructure costs could be lower, it would be fantastic."

"We ran into problems with Elasticsearch throwing a circuit-breaking exception due to field data size being too large. It turned out that the heap size directly impacted this size in a high-throughput environment, causing unexplained instability in Graylog. We were able to troubleshoot on the Elasticsearch size, but we should have been able to reference some minimum requirements for Graylog to know that our settings weren't sufficient."

"I would like to see some kind of visualization included in Graylog."

"The biggest problem is the collector application, as we wanted to avoid using Graylog Collector Sidecar due to its architecture."

"Elasticsearch recommendations for tuning could be better. Graylog doesn't have direct support for running the system inside of Kubernetes, so it can be challenging to fill in the gaps and set up containers in a way that is both performant and stable."

"Graylog could improve the process of creating rules. We have to create them manually by doing parses and applying them. Other SIEM solutions have basic rules and you can create and get more events of interest."

"Lacks sufficient documentation."

"Its scalability gets complicated when we have to update or edit multiple nodes."

More Graylog Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is easy to deploy, easy to use, and you get everything you need to become operational with it, and have nothing further to pay unless you want the OLED plugin."

"I can say that the product is cheaply priced."

"There is no charge for using the open-source version."

"The tool's pricing is flexible and comes at unit cost. You don't have to pay for everything."

"When compared to other products, the price is average or on the low side."

"The pricing is in the middle. I think it is not an expensive experience if we compare it with big names, for example, QRadar, and also Oxide. I think Elastic Security is quite cheap. I would rate the pricing of this solution a five out of ten."

"I find it better than Splunk in terms of cost-effectiveness. For cost-effectiveness, I would rate it a nine out of 10."

"We use the open-source version, so there is no charge for this solution."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

"There is an open source version and an enterprise version. I wouldn't recommend the enterprise version, but as an open source solution, it is solid and works really well."

"Having paid official support is wise for projects."

"Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements."

"We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive."

"We're using the Community edition."

"I am using a community edition. I have not looked at the enterprise offering from Graylog."

"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

More Graylog Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

876,419 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

University

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Security?

Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

I am satisfied with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing cost. It is a pure 10.

See all answers

What do you like most about Graylog?

The product is scalable. The solution is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?

I am not familiar with the pricing details of Graylog, as I was not responsible for that aspect. It was determined that we didn't need an enterprise plan, which is more suited for clients with less...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Graylog?

An improvement I would suggest is in Graylog's user interface, such as allowing for font size adjustments. A potential enhancement could be the integration with Ollama to run large language models ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Elastic Security

Compared 2% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

Grafana Loki vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 27% of the time

Wazuh vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 23% of the time

syslog-ng vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Security Onion vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 2% of the time

More Graylog Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security

December 2025

Download Elastic Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise

November 2025

Download Graylog Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

Graylog2

Overview

Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Elastic

Graylog Enterprise, recognized for log collection, real-time search, and enriched data handling, offers an open-source framework that integrates seamlessly with Elasticsearch. Its user-centric interface streamlines data correlation and log aggregation, supporting both backend services and comprehensive monitoring needs.

Graylog Enterprise stands out for its stability and powerful log management capabilities, facilitating efficient log aggregation, real-time updates, and data analytics. Users benefit from its plugin-based alerting, user-friendly interface, and support for microservices, including Docker integration. The ability to search in detail, flexible API integration, and data enrichment features are highly valued. Challenges include collector application issues, desired visualization enhancements, and authentication integration improvements. Users seek advancements in UI customization, backup functions, and easier rule creation.

What are Graylog Enterprise's most important features?

Log Collection: Efficiently aggregates and handles diverse logs.
Real-Time Search: Provides immediate log data access.
Custom Alerts: Plugin-based alerting for tailored notifications.
Dashboard Enhancements: Improved visualization for data insights.
Data Enrichment: Adds value through detailed log analysis.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Audit Trail Support: Essential for compliance in financial sectors.
Security Event Correlation: Enables incident analysis and response.
Faster Issue Identification: Speeds up troubleshooting with detailed visualization.
API Flexibility: Seamless integration across systems and environments.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Centralized log management enhances oversight.

In industrial use, Graylog Enterprise is crucial for audit trailing in financial sectors, facilitating security event identification and error monitoring. Backend teams leverage real-time analytics for swift issue resolution, while developers appreciate the comprehensive log visualization enabled by Docker integration for microservice management.

Graylog

Sample Customers

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise

November 2025

Free Report: Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

876,419 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Security vs. Graylog Enterprise report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.