We performed a comparison between Elastic Search and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can easily collect all the data and view historical trends using the product. We can view the applications and identify the issues effectively."
"The most valuable features of Elastic Enterprise Search are it's cloud-ready and we do a lot of infrastructure as code. By using ELK, we're able to deploy the solution as part of our ISC deployment."
"The most valuable feature for us is the analytics that we can configure and view using Kibana."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The most valuable features are the ease and speed of the setup."
"Dashboard is very customizable."
"The special text processing features in this solution are very important for me."
"ELK Elasticsearch is 100% scalable as scalability is built into the design"
"It has the ability to easily load slowly changing dimensions."
"The initial setup is easy."
"ODI's best features are customization, integration with other versioning tools, and the ability to define new knowledge modules."
"Oracle provides great documentation."
"The most valuable feature is Data movement."
"The Knowledge Module approach provides an easy and reusable way to create our own integration strategies. It's easy to create these Knowledge Modules to connect to new technologies, for instance."
"The product has an ELT approach."
"The most valuable feature that we use is the Knowledge Modules."
"There are challenges with performance management and scalability."
"Elastic Search needs to improve authentication. It also needs to work on the Kibana visualization dashboard."
"We'd like more user-friendly integrations."
"There is an index issue in which the data starts to crash as it increases."
"There is another solution I'm testing which has a 500 record limit when you do a search on Elastic Enterprise Search. That's the only area in which I'm not sure whether it's a limitation on our end in terms of knowledge or a technical limitation from Elastic Enterprise Search. There is another solution we are looking at that rides on Elastic Enterprise Search. And the limit is for any sort of records that you're doing or data analysis you're trying to do, you can only extract 500 records at a time. I know the open-source nature has a lot of limitations, Otherwise, Elastic Enterprise Search is a fantastic solution and I'd recommend it to anyone."
"There are potential improvements based on our client feedback, like unifying the licensing cost structure."
"While integrating with tools like agents for ingesting data from sources like firewalls is valuable, I believe prioritizing improvements to the core product would be more beneficial."
"The pricing of this product needs to be more clear because I cannot understand it when I review the website."
"At present, when multiple steps are executed in parallel in the load plan and errors occur, the error handling mechanism does not function correctly."
"Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is already good as a solution. Still, it needs some editing of its preview package, or if the package is upgraded, that will make Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) even better."
"The initial setup is a bit complex compared to other tools."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is real-time integration. Currently, my company has a workaround to implement real-time integration, an area on which Oracle must focus more. Real-time integration should be easier in Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). Another area for improvement in Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is integration with more publishers and subscribers rather than just database integrations."
"It needs easier security."
"The tool should improve its pricing. It prevents the application of Oracle ODI on small and medium projects in countries like Croatia, Germany, or the US. While there are no technological obstacles to using it, the high price makes it unfeasible for projects with smaller budgets."
"ODI could improve the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve to use the solution."
"The resource management aspect of the solution could be improved."
Elastic Search is ranked 9th in Cloud Data Integration with 59 reviews while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is ranked 4th in Data Integration with 67 reviews. Elastic Search is rated 8.2, while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) writes "Straightforward to implement, scalable, and has good stability and documentation, but technical support could still be improved". Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Pinecone, Azure Search and Amazon Kendra, whereas Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and Oracle GoldenGate. See our Elastic Search vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.