

Elastic Search and Fivetran compete in the data management and integration category. Elastic Search appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced search and indexing capabilities.
Features: Elastic Search is known for its robust search capabilities, data indexing, and machine learning integrations. It provides quick retrieval of large volumes of unstructured data. On the other hand, Fivetran is valued for its simplicity in setting up data pipelines, real-time data integration, and the availability of numerous pre-built connectors.
Room for Improvement: Elastic Search could enhance its vector database and improve the setup of semantic search. Users report challenges with data mapping conflicts. Fivetran might benefit from expanding its range of connectors and enhancing real-time data transformations. There's also a call for better data pipeline observability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Search supports on-premises and cloud deployments but receives mixed feedback on technical support. Fivetran operates primarily on public cloud services and is praised for its responsive customer support and efficient troubleshooting.
Pricing and ROI: Elastic Search offers an open-source version but can be costly based on features and usage. Some users find ROI reflected in operational efficiency despite pricing concerns. Fivetran's pricing model suits larger organizations due to its cost-effective scaling, though it's considered expensive for smaller operations.
We have not purchased any licensed products, and our use of Elastic Search is purely open-source, contributing positively to our ROI.
It is stable, and we do not encounter critical issues like server downtime, which could result in data loss.
The main benefits observed from using Elastic Search include improvements in operational efficiency, along with cost, time, and resource savings.
Fivetran provides time savings, cost reductions, and improvements in data quality.
It saves us the effort of having one to two data engineers managing the tasks that Fivetran handles.
For P1 tickets, they provide very immediate quick responses and join calls to support and troubleshoot the issue accordingly.
The customer support for Elastic Search is one of the best I have ever tried.
They have always been really responsible and responsive to my requests.
If they could provide support more quickly, that would be great.
The technical support provided by Fivetran has generally been good, with a response time and competence that I would rate as good.
Customer support from Fivetran is quite good; it's really nice and responsive.
We can search through that document quite easily, sometimes in 7 milliseconds, sometimes one or two milliseconds.
Performance tests involving one million requests at once, we encountered issues with shards and nodes not upscaling as needed, leading to crashes and minimal data loss.
I would rate its scalability a ten.
Fivetran's scalability has been tested effectively, and it has been working well for our organization's growing data needs.
The data transfer sometimes exceeded the bandwidth limits without proper notification, which caused issues.
The stability of Elasticsearch was very high.
When you put one keyword, everything related to that keyword in your ecosystem will showcase all the results.
They have 99.9% accuracy on the data load and they maintain transparency.
In my experience, Fivetran is stable with very few instances of downtime or reliability issues.
During the duration of the time that we used Fivetran, it was highly stable.
From a technical point of view, there are no significant issues recalled as Elastic Search has been absolutely awesome for this use case and covers 100% of the needs.
If I need to parse one million records saved into Elastic Search, it becomes a nightmare because I need to do the pagination, and it is very problematic in that regard.
Observability features like search latency, indexing rate, and maybe rejected requests should be added to make the platform more reliable and accessible for everyone.
From a cost perspective, if the number of connectors is lesser, then Fivetran is not the most cost-efficient option.
I want more flexibility during ingestion, specifically for transformations needed beforehand.
Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users.
On the AWS side, it is very expensive because they charge based on query basis or how much data is transferred in and out, making it very expensive.
Having the hosted solution and not having to pay for essentially a DevOps person on staff to manage makes it affordable.
You can host it on-premises, which would incur zero cost, or take it as a SaaS-based service, where the expenses remain minimal.
Our current yearly contract for Fivetran is approximately $70,000.
Elastic Search makes handling large data volumes efficient and supports complex search operations.
The most valuable feature of Elasticsearch was the quick search capability, allowing us to search by any criteria needed.
The speed with which Elastic Search is able to search through all of the documents we place into it is quite remarkable, as we search through 65 billion documents in less than a second in most cases, on a constant consistent basis.
The most valuable feature of Fivetran is its built-in connectors for a wide range of data sources.
The real-time data replication is what I see best in the market where it reduces the overhead of customers needing to maintain the pipeline.
The ability to seamlessly integrate with a large variety of data sources is valuable.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Elastic Search | 1.7% |
| Fivetran | 4.0% |
| Other | 94.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 40 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.
Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.
Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.
At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.
Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.
In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.
Fivetran offers a seamless, scalable data integration platform with strong connectors and real-time synchronization. Tailored for managing ETL workflows and integrating with DBT, it appeals to organizations seeking efficient data management.
Fivetran distinguishes itself through its intuitive interface and extensive scalability, allowing businesses to manage entire ETL workflows seamlessly. Its robust connectors ensure smooth integration with multiple data sources, while transparent logging and minimal coding requirements enhance accessibility. With real-time data synchronization, organizations benefit from up-to-date insights for analytics and engineering purposes. While some users point out areas for improvement like better documentation and expanded integration options, Fivetran remains a cherished tool for centralizing data in data warehouses such as supporting change data capture, migrations, and synchronizations from systems like Salesforce, NetSuite, and Google Analytics. Operating within an ELT framework, it empowers businesses to streamline data processes without complex extraction logic.
What are the key features of Fivetran?In industry-specific implementation, Fivetran is integral for businesses requiring robust data integration to power analytics. Retailers utilize it to consolidate e-commerce data for sales insights, while finance firms rely on its capabilities to merge financial data for reporting. In the tech sector, it supports engineering teams by providing a reliable data pipeline that fuels app development and performance monitoring.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.