Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

EDB Postgres Enterprise Man...
Ranking in Database Development and Management
15th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions
Ranking in Database Development and Management
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (11th), Data Warehouse (9th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager is 2.4%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 2.9%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database Development and Management
 

Featured Reviews

Raghu Suthapalli - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to create dashboards but improvement is needed in pricing and support
The tool helps us to create dashboards EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager helps us to build custom files.  The tool needs improvement in pricing and support.  I have been working with the product for more than eight years.  The product is stable. I rate it a ten out of ten.  I rate the tool's…
Sushma Polavarapu - PeerSpot reviewer
Create essential reporting scripts with simplicity but has some operational challenges
We mainly create functions and scripts required for reporting The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views. It's just simple to use. There is general room for improvement. I have been using it for five years. I have faced stability issues, mainly…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager helps us to build custom files."
"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."
"Large amounts of data can be moved pretty fast using the solution."
"The most valuable feature for us is horizontal scaling."
"Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"
"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."
"The stability of this solution was very good."
"Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room."
"Very fast for query processing."
 

Cons

"The tool needs improvement in pricing and support."
"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."
"I saw some limitation with respect to the column store, and removing this would be an improvement."
"Maintenance is time-consuming."
"Scalability issues are present. Most of our functions or jobs are queued due to that."
"They need to enhance integration with other Big Data products... to integrate with Big Data platforms, and to open a bi-directional connection between Greenplum and Big Data."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"Some integration with other platforms like design tools, and ETL development tools, that will enable some advanced functionality, like fully down processing, etc."
"Other tools besides RabbitMQ provide good TPS and HA."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."
"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."
"The pricing is okay."
"It’s an open-source solution."
"Tanzu Greenplum's pricing is really competitive and gives excellent value for money."
"This is an open source solution."
"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Retailer
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Educational Organization
8%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager?
EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager helps us to build custom files.
What needs improvement with EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager?
The tool needs improvement in pricing and support.
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?
It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.
 

Also Known As

EDB PEM
Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ericsson, KT Corporation, Clear Capital
General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.