Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

E2E Bridge vs IBM WebSphere Integration Developer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

E2E Bridge
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (19th)
IBM WebSphere Integration D...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (32nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Integration solutions, they serve different purposes. E2E Bridge is designed for Business-to-Business Middleware and holds a mindshare of 1.7%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
IBM WebSphere Integration Developer, on the other hand, focuses on Application Infrastructure, holds 1.0% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.
Business-to-Business Middleware Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
E2E Bridge1.7%
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services13.3%
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite10.8%
Other74.2%
Business-to-Business Middleware
Application Infrastructure Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM WebSphere Integration Developer1.0%
Apache Web Server11.0%
IIS10.4%
Other77.6%
Application Infrastructure
 

Featured Reviews

it_user651531 - PeerSpot reviewer
ESB/ABAP developer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
You can build your model with a graphical interface using UML. Apart from some scripting, there is no coding.
An area of improvement is the stopping and starting of services from the Bridge server console. The only way to test services on the Bridge is to have them scheduled so that they run at a specific moment in time. It is, at this time, not possible to trigger this by hand from the console. It is possible to trigger it via the analyze tool, which is used to trace the service. It would be nice to have a simple way to test services without having to schedule them. This is no problem for a developer, but from the functional consultant point of view, the functional consultant needs to test the service and determine if it meets the requirements. It's not a big issue, but it would be nice to have.
Use IBM WebSphere Integration Developer?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

No data available
WebSphere Integration Developer
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agri Retail, dodenhof, PKZ, Nikon, Ypsomed, EVN, Landwirtschaftsverlag Mªnster, Intrum Justitia, UBS, B2BNet, Ammann, Antalis, Apareoo, Coutts, Franke, Swissgrid, UPC Cablecom, Vontobel
The City of Edinburgh Council, Factor-y S.r.l., Alleyoop Inc., Dow Chemical Company, Airbus, Wittmann EDV-Systeme, The Chevrolet Volt, Federal Employment Agency, Web Business Consulting, Rosenthal & Rosenthal
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Informatica, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: January 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.