DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs SolarWinds ipMonitor comparison

"It delivers our customers many metrics, so they may make decisions"

"It gives us visibility inside applications. It helps us to dig down and find the root cause of any issue within the network."

"I recall the initial setup being straightforward."

"I definitely appreciate the flexibility and ease of use. We've been using UIM for almost three years now. It's pretty much point and click, very easy to use. And we've had no problems scaling it to our own environment."

"It is reliable when it comes to monitoring."

"I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution."

"It is easy to implement."

"The monitoring of the applications to let our business know when things are performing and that they're up and available."

"IPAM is used for IP address reservation and tracking, helping us easily identify live IP addresses."

"IPAM is used for IP address reservation and tracking, helping us easily identify live IP addresses."

"The most valuable feature is the availability of end devices."

"We would like to see automatic network topology."

"In the UMP, certain devices will show up multiple times and they don't correlate correctly. That's one of the issues."

"The dashboards need to be improved."

"Reporting capability can be improved especially when it comes to availability."

"The company has not kept pace with developments."

"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."

"I'm very happy with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, but what could be improved is its user interface because currently, it has many wide spaces. All the information you need is in DX Unified Infrastructure Management, and it's a reliable tool, and though that's more important than the gaps in the user interface being smaller or wider, those gaps still need some improvement. I know the team is working on it. My company had some backend problems with DX Unified Infrastructure Management in the past that have now been solved. The setup for the tool also needs improvement because it's complex. Another room for improvement in DX Unified Infrastructure Management is its technical support because it's sometimes not as knowledgeable or responsive. What I'm suggesting to be added to the tool is an open-standard ELK Elastic-based database where you can put in all data, so that you can use the data in other systems as well."

"The UIM has no features through goods and services yet. ​"

"The licensing cost is high compared to open source tools."

"The licensing cost is high compared to open source tools."

"The solution does not include enough features and has some performance issues."

"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."

"CAD $400,000 annually."

"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."

"The solution is a bit expensive because the annual license does not include new features that are priced as add-ons."