Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs ManageEngine Applications Manager comparison

Broadcom and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #40, while ManageEngine is ranked #37 with an average rating of 7.5. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in CMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.
DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews
  • 1,640 Views
  • 443 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
ManageEngine Applications M...
Read 17 ManageEngine Applications Manager reviews
  • 1,184 Views
  • 355 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ManageEngine Applications Manager and DX Unified Infrastructure Management compete in the infrastructure management category. DX Unified Infrastructure Management has the upper hand with its advanced features and scalability, appealing more to larger enterprises.

Features: ManageEngine Applications Manager includes deep insights into both virtual and physical environments, customizable dashboards, and robust application performance monitoring. DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers extensive scalability, supports a wide range of integrations, and provides advanced analytics, making it suitable for larger businesses.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine could benefit from enhanced scalability options and more extensive integration capabilities. Improvements in its advanced analytics features would also add value. DX Unified Infrastructure Management could simplify its deployment strategy, streamline its learning curve, and enhance user-friendliness in its documentation and support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both tools are streamlined in deployment, with ManageEngine allowing straightforward integration for smaller systems. DX Unified Infrastructure Management requires more detailed strategies for larger enterprises. Both provide reliable support, but ManageEngine is noted for a more personalized approach, while DX offers extensive documentation beneficial for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Applications Manager is more attractive due to lower initial setup costs and faster ROI, appealing to SMEs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management, although higher in upfront investment, offers substantial long-term ROI and scalability, suiting large enterprises with broad infrastructure monitoring needs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
40th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (75th), Server Monitoring (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (52nd), AIOps (24th)
ManageEngine Applications M...
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
37th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (43rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Applications Manager is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Mark Tukh - PeerSpot reviewer
Great scalability, versatility, infrastructure coverage and ease of implementation
I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. The number of people needed for deployment depends on the customer, but we usually need at least one person and two to three at other times. The initial implementation takes about two months. The full implementation can be infinite because you may want to implement more. The product does not require a lot of maintenance. To increase the implementation, we push additional services in the first and second years to make it more robust and fully implemented. We usually sell to big enterprises. It can also be affordable for smaller enterprises, but we don't work with them a lot. We have from 2,000 to 10,000 workers. So the product itself can have five, ten or even 20 users.
Read full review
Ossama Arab - PeerSpot reviewer
Anomaly detection maintains the system's health and good for monitoring
The primary use case is for services and incident management.   The anomaly detection feature helps with maintaining the system's health. It is regarding our IT incident center.  ManageEngine is for incident management and monitoring.  The inventory of assets needs improvement. The asset…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We are able to go in and actually leverage the thick client for a nice easy drag and drop solution."
"Another division handed us the opportunity to monitor their solutions as written, and UIM was very useful for that."
"It gives us visibility inside applications. It helps us to dig down and find the root cause of any issue within the network."
"It reduced cycles for a lot of quick out-of-the-box functionality. It also allowed us to get away from being stuck in SNMP, VTP V2, based off of agent deployment."
"Technical support is great."
"Great out-of-the-box capability."
"Having all of our information within one tool set; our alerts, our monitors, and the things that our operations team needs to function."
"It's easy to push out across numerous servers. Very scalable."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros
"What I like most about ManageEngine Applications Manager is its price point, apart from its technicalities. The solution is cheaper than its competitors. ManageEngine Applications Manager has helpful documentation that makes setting it up straightforward."
"The initial setup was straightforward, without complexity."
"Its price and the flexibility to deploy are the most valuable. Flexibility is very important, and you can scale from very basic to more complex. This solution is a part of a complete suite of management tools. So, it can be integrated with other solutions for monitoring networks, which is very important. You can expand it or interconnect it with many other tools, which is a powerful feature. We have a very good and long relationship with ManageEngine support guys. They provide very good support for us."
"The feature that I have found most valuable in ManageEngine Applications Manager is its dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to be able to monitor Kubernetes."
"The Service Level Management (SLM) rules engine stands out due to its flexibility and customization capabilities, making it an invaluable tool for tailoring processes to our specific needs."
"We do not have pricing constraints as an organization, because we do have reservations about ManageEngine being functionally scalable."
"ITSM is a valuable feature, it complies with the requirements in Pakistan."
More ManageEngine Applications Manager pros
 

Cons

"DX UIM's reporting and customization need to be improved."
"It would be good to implement views showing the aggregated status graphically."
"Better support and more accessible resources are crucial. Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly."
"The other element is that there are no real templates, out of the box. Let's go with an example where we do have the probe, which is great, and we do have a really nuanced customer with a small set of devices that maybe not a lot of other customers use. There might not be a template in place, so effectively we have the tool in front of us but we still need to develop a solution. So it would be really nice to see a little bit more of something like a central repository of templates that we could use. That would help us expedite our onboarding process."
"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."
"How we can get more native information from CA's solutions."
"It needs a little bit more functionality in the Admin Console."
"We've had issues with pulling reports."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons
"I would like the solution to improve the ability to track services."
"They could probably rearrange the UI so that it would be easy for people who are new to the Application Manager to configure things."
"The information provided by ManageEngine is not deep-dive like IBM and CA provide."
"Lacks an SIEM solution which can be found in other products."
"They can improve the post-processing of the data. AppDynamics has more powerful tools for post-processing or analytics. It has some limitations in more complex environments, but because we are free to use different solutions, we try to find what is best for the customers or the problem we are trying to solve."
"The agent often crashes when there is too much load on the application side. If a sudden storm of data comes in, the agent crashes down most of the time."
"The integration process with third party tools poses some challenges; enhancing the robustness of these integrations could greatly improve overall functionality and user experience."
"An area for improvement in ManageEngine Applications Manager is artificial intelligence. If AI is integrated into the solution, it'll be a piece of cake. Currently, it's all configured manually."
More ManageEngine Applications Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."
"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."
"CAD $400,000 annually."
"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."
"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."
"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."
"The annual licensing depends on the number of monitors you have connected. Once you get to two hundred monitors you can see the price reflect."
"The licensing costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager are around $1,200 per year. For additional monitors, you have to pay extra."
"The solution is noted for its cost-effectiveness, a crucial consideration for potential users."
"The cost of this solution is not too bad, although it could be cheaper considering what you're getting for the price."
"Its price is good."
"ManageEngine Applications Manager has reasonable pricing. It's more affordable than other solutions in the market. My company has an instance-based license for ManageEngine Applications Manager. You can purchase a yearly subscription or a perpetual license. The standard license covers most features, but you can still have some paid add-ons."
"Price-wise, it is a cheap tool...The solution's licensing model is subscription-based, in which yearly payments are to be made."
"The solution's licensing costs are yearly."
More ManageEngine Applications Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Performing Arts
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?
We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?
I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?
The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager?
The solution is noted for its cost-effectiveness, a crucial consideration for potential users.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ManageEngine Applications Manager?
The integration process with third party tools poses some challenges; enhancing the robustness of these integrations could greatly improve overall functionality and user experience.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Applications Manager?
Our primary application of this solution revolves around IT infrastructure monitoring. We focus on alert consolidation from core network and service levels to enhance our service management framework.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Fortra's Network Server Suite vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 19% of the time
Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 11% of the time
NetCrunch vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
NetCrunch vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 9% of the time
Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 8% of the time
Ixia Hawkeye vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Ixia Hawkeye vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 8% of the time
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors
Grafana vs ManageEngine Applications Manager Logo
Grafana vs ManageEngine Applications Manager
Compared 15% of the time
Datadog vs ManageEngine Applications Manager Logo
Datadog vs ManageEngine Applications Manager
Compared 12% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs ManageEngine Applications Manager Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs ManageEngine Applications Manager
Compared 10% of the time
Dynatrace vs ManageEngine Applications Manager Logo
Dynatrace vs ManageEngine Applications Manager
Compared 9% of the time
Prometheus Group vs ManageEngine Applications Manager Logo
Prometheus Group vs ManageEngine Applications Manager
Compared 8% of the time
More ManageEngine Applications Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
August 2025
DX Unified Infrastructure Management reportDownload DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine Applications Manager
August 2025
ManageEngine Applications Manager reportDownload ManageEngine Applications Manager product report
 

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager
Applications Manager
 

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

ManageEngine Applications Manager is an application performance management (APM) solution that is designed to give users deep insights into both the way that their applications perform and the way that users of those applications experience them. Organizations can use this solution to identify areas where their critical applications are lacking and address them before there are any negative repercussions. ManageEngine Applications Manager is the kind of tool that companies of all sizes can use to keep their applications running in the best way possible.

ManageEngine Applications Manager Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying ManageEngine Applications Manager include:

  • Gain real-time comprehensive insights. ManageEngine Applications Manager makes it possible for organizations to gain deep insights into every aspect of an application’s performance. This takes place in real time and enables users to take complete control of their application’s management.
  • Keep applications running smoothly. Organizations don’t have to worry about missing issues that will disrupt users’ ability to have a smooth experience. ManageEngine Applications Manager detects any issues and allows administrators to quickly address them before they can become major problems for users.
  • Ease of use. ManageEngine Applications Manager is designed to be intuitive to use so that organizations do not need to formally train employees in its use. This saves time and makes organizations more productive.

ManageEngine Applications Manager Features

Some of the many useful features ManageEngine Applications Manager has to offer include:

  • AI-powered threat detection and remediation. ManageEngine Applications Manager leverages AI software to spot issues as they arise and to alert administrators. Additionally, users can use this AI to automate issue remediation, which will allow administrators to focus on other tasks.
  • Advanced analytics. ManageEngine Applications Manager uses various analytics tools to enable users to gain critical insights from their data. These include custom dashboards that allow you to display and interpret data.
  • Real user monitoring. Administrators have access to tools that allow them to monitor users’ application traffic. The tools deliver detailed reports that track various critical pieces of information related to the users and their application user experience.

Reviews from Real Users

ManageEngine Applications Manager is a solution that stands out when it is compared to many of its competitors. It is part of a complete suite of management tools that users can take advantage of. The way that ManageEngine Applications Manager keeps up to date with a regular schedule of software updates enables organizations to manage their applications without worrying that they are missing any important capabilities or features. If any feature is absent, users can integrate the solution with other monitoring solutions. ManageEngine Applications Manager regularly undergoes updates that ensure that users have access to all of the latest features and patches.

Rodrigo T., the CEO of AXIOVISTA spa, writes, “This solution is a part of a complete suite of management tools. So, it can be integrated with other solutions for monitoring networks, which is very important. You can expand it or interconnect it with many other tools, which is a powerful feature.”

Syed A., the enterprise senior account manager of sales at a tech services company, writes, “Our customers appreciate that ManageEngine sends regular updates, upgrading their software several times a year.”

ManageEngine
 

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex
Certis Europe, Financial Domain, SaaS Office Suite, On Demand TV, Parliament's IT Systems, Sastra Technologies, UniServity
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager
July 2025
Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager report.
See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.