DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs ManageEngine Applications Manager comparison

Broadcom and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #40, while ManageEngine is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.3. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in CMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews

399 Views
57 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Applications M...

Read 17 ManageEngine Applications Manager reviews

316 Views
39 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

ManageEngine Applications M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ManageEngine Applications Manager and DX Unified Infrastructure Management compete in the infrastructure management category. DX Unified Infrastructure Management has the upper hand with its advanced features and scalability, appealing more to larger enterprises.

Features: ManageEngine Applications Manager includes deep insights into both virtual and physical environments, customizable dashboards, and robust application performance monitoring. DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers extensive scalability, supports a wide range of integrations, and provides advanced analytics, making it suitable for larger businesses.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine could benefit from enhanced scalability options and more extensive integration capabilities. Improvements in its advanced analytics features would also add value. DX Unified Infrastructure Management could simplify its deployment strategy, streamline its learning curve, and enhance user-friendliness in its documentation and support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both tools are streamlined in deployment, with ManageEngine allowing straightforward integration for smaller systems. DX Unified Infrastructure Management requires more detailed strategies for larger enterprises. Both provide reliable support, but ManageEngine is noted for a more personalized approach, while DX offers extensive documentation beneficial for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Applications Manager is more attractive due to lower initial setup costs and faster ROI, appealing to SMEs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management, although higher in upfront investment, offers substantial long-term ROI and scalability, suiting large enterprises with broad infrastructure monitoring needs.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

40th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (76th), Server Monitoring (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (54th), AIOps (24th)

ManageEngine Applications M...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

35th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (44th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Applications Manager is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

Great scalability, versatility, infrastructure coverage and ease of implementation

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. The number of people needed for deployment depends on the customer, but we usually need at least one person and two to three at other times. The initial implementation takes about two months. The full implementation can be infinite because you may want to implement more. The product does not require a lot of maintenance. To increase the implementation, we push additional services in the first and second years to make it more robust and fully implemented. We usually sell to big enterprises. It can also be affordable for smaller enterprises, but we don't work with them a lot. We have from 2,000 to 10,000 workers. So the product itself can have five, ten or even 20 users.

Read full review

Ossama Arab

Project Coordinator at United Al Saqer Group LLC

Anomaly detection maintains the system's health and good for monitoring

The primary use case is for services and incident management. The anomaly detection feature helps with maintaining the system's health. It is regarding our IT incident center. ManageEngine is for incident management and monitoring. The inventory of assets needs improvement. The asset…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"MultiWAN and Balance service"

"It is easy to implement but requires good planning."

"It is very scalable."

"It's easy to push out across numerous servers. Very scalable."

"The number of probes available. Out of the box, I believe about 200 probes are available. And, if there's a probe that is not available, you can write one. You can also go to the communities and suggest, and based on demand, CA will write one for you."

"Probe packages and probe deployment."

"It reduced cycles for a lot of quick out-of-the-box functionality. It also allowed us to get away from being stuck in SNMP, VTP V2, based off of agent deployment."

"You can integrate clouds, hybrid infrastructure, and on-premise infrastructure into one product."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use."

"The feature that I have found most valuable in ManageEngine Applications Manager is its dashboard."

"I am impressed with the tool's reporting feature which is simple."

"ManageEngine Applications Manager maintains the historical data and it's easy for us to analyze the trends and patterns and fix them accordingly."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to be able to monitor Kubernetes."

"What I like most about ManageEngine Applications Manager is its price point, apart from its technicalities. The solution is cheaper than its competitors. ManageEngine Applications Manager has helpful documentation that makes setting it up straightforward."

"The Service Level Management (SLM) rules engine stands out due to its flexibility and customization capabilities, making it an invaluable tool for tailoring processes to our specific needs."

"The initial setup was straightforward, without complexity."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager pros

Cons

"I'm very happy with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, but what could be improved is its user interface because currently, it has many wide spaces. All the information you need is in DX Unified Infrastructure Management, and it's a reliable tool, and though that's more important than the gaps in the user interface being smaller or wider, those gaps still need some improvement. I know the team is working on it. My company had some backend problems with DX Unified Infrastructure Management in the past that have now been solved. The setup for the tool also needs improvement because it's complex. Another room for improvement in DX Unified Infrastructure Management is its technical support because it's sometimes not as knowledgeable or responsive. What I'm suggesting to be added to the tool is an open-standard ELK Elastic-based database where you can put in all data, so that you can use the data in other systems as well."

"I'd also like to see more probes. More probes in the sense that we were coming across devices that we're expected to monitor and manage for which, out of the box, there isn't a nice, clean solution. There are probes that are dedicated for certain devices and certain device types, which is great. But then there are times we come across nuanced products that we have to develop our own solution for. There are probes that exist in there that allow us to make a customized solution, but it takes a lot more time."

"There should be wider coverage of storage infrastructure."

"They need to continue to advance the filter capabilities, and provide more input fields."

"I think it can be improved by a greater provision of specialized technical support, as there are very few trained personnel there."

"I would like to see auditability. We've built our own audit functionality to ensure that every CI has the desired model configuration applied to it. And we run that on a daily basis. If that became part of the product, I think it might be a little bit less intensive in terms of resource, because we're doing it with scripts."

"The UIM has no features through goods and services yet. "

"Reporting capability can be improved especially when it comes to availability."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons

"An area for improvement in ManageEngine Applications Manager is artificial intelligence. If AI is integrated into the solution, it'll be a piece of cake. Currently, it's all configured manually."

"The inventory of assets needs improvement."

"The integration process with third party tools poses some challenges; enhancing the robustness of these integrations could greatly improve overall functionality and user experience."

"The problem is that implementation requires a significant amount of mapping effort."

"Even with the top-notch dashboard, it could be made stronger in order to have an additional plug-in for analytics."

"One area of improvement is the dashboard should be more readable and available."

"The agent often crashes when there is too much load on the application side. If a sudden storm of data comes in, the agent crashes down most of the time."

"Lacks an SIEM solution which can be found in other products."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CAD $400,000 annually."

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."

"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."

"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."

"The cost of this solution is not too bad, although it could be cheaper considering what you're getting for the price."

"Its price is good."

"Price-wise, it is a cheap tool...The solution's licensing model is subscription-based, in which yearly payments are to be made."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"ManageEngine Applications Manager has reasonable pricing. It's more affordable than other solutions in the market. My company has an instance-based license for ManageEngine Applications Manager. You can purchase a yearly subscription or a perpetual license. The standard license covers most features, but you can still have some paid add-ons."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly."

"The annual licensing depends on the number of monitors you have connected. Once you get to two hundred monitors you can see the price reflect."

"The solution is noted for its cost-effectiveness, a crucial consideration for potential users."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?

We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?

I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?

The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine Applications Manager?

ManageEngine Applications Manager's installation is pretty easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager?

The solution is noted for its cost-effectiveness, a crucial consideration for potential users.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Applications Manager?

The integration process with third party tools poses some challenges; enhancing the robustness of these integrations could greatly improve overall functionality and user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 13% of the time

Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 10% of the time

Ixia Hawkeye vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 10% of the time

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors

Grafana vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 18% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Prometheus Group vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 8% of the time

More ManageEngine Applications Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management

June 2025

DX Unified Infrastructure Management report

Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Applications Manager

May 2025

ManageEngine Applications Manager report

Download ManageEngine Applications Manager product report

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager

Applications Manager

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

ManageEngine Applications Manager is an application performance management (APM) solution that is designed to give users deep insights into both the way that their applications perform and the way that users of those applications experience them. Organizations can use this solution to identify areas where their critical applications are lacking and address them before there are any negative repercussions. ManageEngine Applications Manager is the kind of tool that companies of all sizes can use to keep their applications running in the best way possible.

ManageEngine Applications Manager Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying ManageEngine Applications Manager include:

Gain real-time comprehensive insights. ManageEngine Applications Manager makes it possible for organizations to gain deep insights into every aspect of an application’s performance. This takes place in real time and enables users to take complete control of their application’s management.

Keep applications running smoothly. Organizations don’t have to worry about missing issues that will disrupt users’ ability to have a smooth experience. ManageEngine Applications Manager detects any issues and allows administrators to quickly address them before they can become major problems for users.

Ease of use. ManageEngine Applications Manager is designed to be intuitive to use so that organizations do not need to formally train employees in its use. This saves time and makes organizations more productive.

ManageEngine Applications Manager Features

Some of the many useful features ManageEngine Applications Manager has to offer include:

AI-powered threat detection and remediation. ManageEngine Applications Manager leverages AI software to spot issues as they arise and to alert administrators. Additionally, users can use this AI to automate issue remediation, which will allow administrators to focus on other tasks.

Advanced analytics. ManageEngine Applications Manager uses various analytics tools to enable users to gain critical insights from their data. These include custom dashboards that allow you to display and interpret data.

Real user monitoring. Administrators have access to tools that allow them to monitor users’ application traffic. The tools deliver detailed reports that track various critical pieces of information related to the users and their application user experience.

Reviews from Real Users

ManageEngine Applications Manager is a solution that stands out when it is compared to many of its competitors. It is part of a complete suite of management tools that users can take advantage of. The way that ManageEngine Applications Manager keeps up to date with a regular schedule of software updates enables organizations to manage their applications without worrying that they are missing any important capabilities or features. If any feature is absent, users can integrate the solution with other monitoring solutions. ManageEngine Applications Manager regularly undergoes updates that ensure that users have access to all of the latest features and patches.

Rodrigo T., the CEO of AXIOVISTA spa, writes, “This solution is a part of a complete suite of management tools. So, it can be integrated with other solutions for monitoring networks, which is very important. You can expand it or interconnect it with many other tools, which is a powerful feature.”

Syed A., the enterprise senior account manager of sales at a tech services company, writes, “Our customers appreciate that ManageEngine sends regular updates, upgrading their software several times a year.”

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex

Certis Europe, Financial Domain, SaaS Office Suite, On Demand TV, Parliament's IT Systems, Sastra Technologies, UniServity

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

June 2025

Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.